East Timor has a population density of 250.2 people per square mile compared to 4,704 people in Malta. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 5,979 sq ft in Malta. East Timor and Malta rank 98th and 5th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.007% of the population and 0.0002% of the land area for Malta, making the population density in East Timor 94.7% lower than in Malta.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
East Timor
|
Malta
|
|
| 2026 | 250.2 | 4,704 |
| 2025 | 247.1 | 4,659 |
| 2024 | 244 | 4,604 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 4,474 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 4,299 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 4,194 |
| 2020 | 231 | 4,172 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 4,079 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 3,917 |
| 2017 | 218 | 3,781 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 3,679 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 3,595 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 3,508 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 3,438 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 3,400 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 3,369 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 3,355 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 3,338 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 3,313 |
| 2007 | 175 | 3,292 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 3,280 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 3,269 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 3,248 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 3,226 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 3,205 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 3,181 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 3,157 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 3,137 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 3,118 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 3,098 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 3,075 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 3,055 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 3,033 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 3,005 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 2,975 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | 2,945 |
| 1990 | 132.4 | 2,867 |
| 1989 | 129.7 | 2,839 |
| 1988 | 127.3 | 2,811 |
| 1987 | 125.1 | 2,788 |
| 1986 | 123.2 | 2,769 |
| 1985 | 121.3 | 2,723 |
| 1984 | 119.6 | 2,676 |
| 1983 | 118 | 2,675 |
| 1982 | 116.5 | 2,638 |
| 1981 | 115 | 2,582 |
| 1980 | 113.2 | 2,563 |
| 1979 | 111.2 | 2,536 |
| 1978 | 109.5 | 2,511 |
| 1977 | 107.7 | 2,485 |
| 1976 | 105.8 | 2,475 |
| 1975 | 104.2 | 2,462 |
| 1974 | 102.9 | 2,444 |
| 1973 | 101.5 | 2,446 |
| 1972 | 99.8 | 2,448 |
| 1971 | 98.1 | 2,450 |
| 1970 | 96.3 | 2,450 |
| 1969 | 94.6 | 2,463 |
| 1968 | 93 | 2,492 |
| 1967 | 91.4 | 2,522 |
| 1966 | 89.8 | 2,551 |
| 1965 | 88.3 | 2,580 |
| 1964 | 86.9 | 2,600 |
| 1963 | 85.4 | 2,611 |
| 1962 | 84.1 | 2,622 |
| 1961 | 82.8 | 2,632 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/east-timor/malta | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in East Timor increased by 47.1%, compared to a 43.4% growth in Malta.
In 2006, East Timor ranked 109th by population density and is 98th now. Malta was 5th in 2006 and still ranks 5th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
East Timor
|
Malta
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 250.2 ppl/mi² | 4,704 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 98/197 | 5/197 |
| Population |
1441764
|
581729
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 123.6 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 6,055 sq ft |
| Rural population | 71.3% | 4.35% |
| Urban population | 28.7% | 95.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Malta
|
|
| 2024 | 28.7% | 95.7% |
| 2023 | 28.6% | 95.6% |
| 2022 | 28.6% | 95.6% |
| 2021 | 28.8% | 95.5% |
| 2020 | 29% | 95.2% |
| 2019 | 29.1% | 94.9% |
| 2018 | 29.2% | 94.7% |
| 2017 | 29.4% | 94.6% |
| 2016 | 29.4% | 94.5% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 94.4% |
| 2014 | 29.5% | 94.4% |
| 2013 | 29.6% | 94.4% |
| 2012 | 29.6% | 94.4% |
| 2011 | 29.6% | 94.3% |
| 2010 | 29.6% | 94.2% |
| 2009 | 29.4% | 94.1% |
| 2008 | 28.8% | 94% |
| 2007 | 28% | 93.9% |
| 2006 | 27.1% | 93.8% |
| 2005 | 26.3% | 93.7% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 93.6% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 93.5% |
| 2002 | 24.9% | 93.4% |
| 2001 | 24.5% | 93.4% |
| 2000 | 24.1% | 93.3% |
| 1999 | 23.8% | 93.2% |
| 1998 | 23.5% | 93.1% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 93% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 92.9% |
| 1995 | 22.6% | 92.7% |
| 1994 | 22.3% | 92.5% |
| 1993 | 22% | 92.2% |
| 1992 | 21.7% | 91.8% |
| 1991 | 21.3% | 91.4% |
| 1990 | 21% | 91% |
| 1989 | 20.6% | 90.7% |
| 1988 | 20.3% | 90.3% |
| 1987 | 19.8% | 90.1% |
| 1986 | 19.4% | 89.9% |
| 1985 | 19% | 89.8% |
| 1984 | 18.5% | 89.8% |
| 1983 | 18.1% | 89.7% |
| 1982 | 17.6% | 89.7% |
| 1981 | 17.1% | 89.6% |
| 1980 | 16.6% | 89.6% |
| 1979 | 16.2% | 89.6% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 89.5% |
| 1977 | 15.2% | 89.5% |
| 1976 | 14.7% | 89.5% |
| 1975 | 14.3% | 89.4% |
| 1974 | 13.8% | 89.4% |
| 1973 | 13.4% | 89.4% |
| 1972 | 13% | 89.4% |
| 1971 | 12.6% | 89.4% |
| 1970 | 12.2% | 89.4% |
| 1969 | 11.8% | 89.4% |
| 1968 | 11.5% | 89.4% |
| 1967 | 11.2% | 89.4% |
| 1966 | 10.9% | 89.4% |
| 1965 | 10.7% | 89.5% |
| 1964 | 10.5% | 89.6% |
| 1963 | 10.3% | 89.7% |
| 1962 | 10.2% | 89.9% |
| 1961 | 10.1% | 90% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 90.1% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/east-timor/malta | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 25.7% to 28.7% in East Timor and from 93.6% to 95.7% in Malta.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/east-timor/malta | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.