Latvia has a population density of 77.5 people per square mile compared to 9.53 people in Namibia. Latvia has 373,317 sq ft of land per person vs 2,932,826 sq ft in Namibia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Latvia and Namibia are ranked 155th and 195th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.55% of the land area for Namibia, hence the population density in Latvia is 713% higher than in Namibia.
Population density comparison
Latvia
|
Namibia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 9.53 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 155/197 | 195/197 |
| Population |
1844219
|
3141364
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 317,874 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 359,656 sq ft | 2,924,567 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 44.2% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 55.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Latvia vs Namibia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.7%, compared to a 56% growth in Namibia.
In 2004, Latvia ranked 135th for population density and is in 155th place now. Namibia was 191st in 2004 and ranks 195th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Namibia
|
|
| 2024 | 77.5 | 9.53 |
| 2023 | 78.1 | 9.32 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 9.09 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 8.84 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 8.58 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 8.34 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 8.11 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 7.89 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 7.67 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 7.47 |
| 2014 | 83 | 7.27 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 7.09 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 6.9 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 6.75 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 6.64 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 6.54 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 6.44 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 6.35 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 6.27 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 6.19 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 6.11 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 6.03 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 5.95 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 5.84 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 5.72 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 5.59 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 5.45 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 5.31 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 5.18 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 5.04 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 4.9 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 4.75 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 4.6 |
| 1991 | - | 4.45 |
| 1990 | - | 4.31 |
| 1989 | - | 4.05 |
| 1988 | - | 3.81 |
| 1987 | - | 3.67 |
| 1986 | - | 3.56 |
| 1985 | - | 3.45 |
| 1984 | - | 3.35 |
| 1983 | - | 3.26 |
| 1982 | - | 3.18 |
| 1981 | - | 3.12 |
| 1980 | - | 3.09 |
| 1979 | - | 3.03 |
| 1978 | - | 2.98 |
| 1977 | - | 2.93 |
| 1976 | - | 2.85 |
| 1975 | - | 2.77 |
| 1974 | - | 2.69 |
| 1973 | - | 2.61 |
| 1972 | - | 2.53 |
| 1971 | - | 2.46 |
| 1970 | - | 2.38 |
| 1969 | - | 2.32 |
| 1968 | - | 2.25 |
| 1967 | - | 2.19 |
| 1966 | - | 2.13 |
| 1965 | - | 2.08 |
| 1964 | - | 2.03 |
| 1963 | - | 1.98 |
| 1962 | - | 1.94 |
| 1961 | - | 1.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Namibia
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 55.8% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 54.9% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 54% |
| 2021 | 68.4% | 53% |
| 2020 | 68.3% | 52% |
| 2019 | 68.2% | 51% |
| 2018 | 68.1% | 50% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | 49% |
| 2016 | 68% | 48% |
| 2015 | 68% | 46.9% |
| 2014 | 68% | 45.8% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | 44.8% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | 43.7% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 42.6% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 41.6% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 40.6% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 39.6% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 38.6% |
| 2006 | 68% | 37.6% |
| 2005 | 68% | 36.6% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 35.7% |
| 2003 | 67.8% | 34.7% |
| 2002 | 67.8% | 33.8% |
| 2001 | 67.9% | 32.9% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 32.4% |
| 1999 | 68.2% | 31.9% |
| 1998 | 68.5% | 31.3% |
| 1997 | 68.6% | 30.8% |
| 1996 | 68.7% | 30.3% |
| 1995 | 68.8% | 29.8% |
| 1994 | 68.9% | 29.3% |
| 1993 | 68.8% | 28.8% |
| 1992 | 68.9% | 28.3% |
| 1991 | 69.2% | 27.9% |
| 1990 | 69.2% | 27.7% |
| 1989 | 69.2% | 27.4% |
| 1988 | 69.1% | 27.1% |
| 1987 | 68.9% | 26.9% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 26.6% |
| 1985 | 68.6% | 26.4% |
| 1984 | 68.3% | 26.1% |
| 1983 | 68% | 25.9% |
| 1982 | 67.7% | 25.6% |
| 1981 | 67.4% | 25.4% |
| 1980 | 67.1% | 25.1% |
| 1979 | 66.7% | 24.8% |
| 1978 | 66.1% | 24.5% |
| 1977 | 65.5% | 24.2% |
| 1976 | 64.8% | 23.9% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 23.7% |
| 1974 | 63.5% | 23.4% |
| 1973 | 62.8% | 23.1% |
| 1972 | 62.1% | 22.8% |
| 1971 | 61.4% | 22.6% |
| 1970 | 60.7% | 22.3% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 21.9% |
| 1968 | 59.2% | 21.4% |
| 1967 | 58.4% | 20.9% |
| 1966 | 57.6% | 20.5% |
| 1965 | 56.8% | 20% |
| 1964 | 56% | 19.6% |
| 1963 | 55.3% | 19.2% |
| 1962 | 54.5% | 18.7% |
| 1961 | 53.7% | 18.3% |
| 1960 | 52.9% | 17.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia and from 35.7% to 55.8% in Namibia.
Densely populated cities
|
Namibia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Windhoek | 431K |
| Walvis Bay | 103K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
