Latvia has a population density of 77.5 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. Latvia has 373,317 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Latvia and Zambia are ranked 155th and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Latvia has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in Latvia is 4.38% higher than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
Latvia
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 77.5 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 155/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
1844219
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 24,027 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 359,656 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 11.6% |
Latvia vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Latvia decreased by 17.7%, compared to a 88% growth in Zambia.
In 2004, Latvia ranked 135th for population density and is in 155th place now. Zambia was 163rd in 2004 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 77.5 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 78.1 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 78.2 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 79.1 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 79.7 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 80.2 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 80.8 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 81.6 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 82.3 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 83 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 83.8 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 84.7 | 52 |
| 2011 | 85.7 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 87.3 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 89.1 | 47 |
| 2008 | 90.6 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 91.6 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 92.3 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | 93.2 | 40.8 |
| 2004 | 94.2 | 39.5 |
| 2003 | 95.2 | 38.3 |
| 2002 | 96.2 | 37.1 |
| 2001 | 97.3 | 36 |
| 2000 | 98.5 | 34.9 |
| 1999 | 99.5 | 33.9 |
| 1998 | 100.3 | 33 |
| 1997 | 101.3 | 32.2 |
| 1996 | 102.3 | 31.4 |
| 1995 | 103.4 | 30.6 |
| 1994 | 104.9 | 29.9 |
| 1993 | 106.7 | 29.2 |
| 1992 | 108.8 | 28.5 |
| 1991 | - | 27.8 |
| 1990 | - | 27.1 |
| 1989 | - | 26.4 |
| 1988 | - | 25.8 |
| 1987 | - | 25.1 |
| 1986 | - | 24.3 |
| 1985 | - | 23.6 |
| 1984 | - | 22.9 |
| 1983 | - | 22.2 |
| 1982 | - | 21.5 |
| 1981 | - | 20.8 |
| 1980 | - | 20.2 |
| 1979 | - | 19.6 |
| 1978 | - | 19 |
| 1977 | - | 18.5 |
| 1976 | - | 17.9 |
| 1975 | - | 17.4 |
| 1974 | - | 16.9 |
| 1973 | - | 16.4 |
| 1972 | - | 15.9 |
| 1971 | - | 15.5 |
| 1970 | - | 15.1 |
| 1969 | - | 14.6 |
| 1968 | - | 14.2 |
| 1967 | - | 13.7 |
| 1966 | - | 13.3 |
| 1965 | - | 12.9 |
| 1964 | - | 12.5 |
| 1963 | - | 12.1 |
| 1962 | - | 11.7 |
| 1961 | - | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Latvia
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 68.4% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 68.3% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 68.2% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 68.1% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 68.1% | 43% |
| 2016 | 68% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 68% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 68% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 67.8% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 67.8% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 67.8% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 67.9% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 68% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 68% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 67.9% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 67.8% | 36% |
| 2002 | 67.8% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 67.9% | 35% |
| 2000 | 68.1% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 68.2% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 68.5% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 68.6% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 68.7% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 68.8% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 68.9% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 68.8% | 38% |
| 1992 | 68.9% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 69.2% | 39% |
| 1990 | 69.2% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 69.2% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 69.1% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 68.9% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 68.6% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 68.3% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 68% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 67.7% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 67.4% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 67.1% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 66.7% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 66.1% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 65.5% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 64.8% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 63.5% | 34% |
| 1973 | 62.8% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 62.1% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 61.4% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 60.7% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 59.2% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 58.4% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 57.6% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 56.8% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 56% | 22% |
| 1963 | 55.3% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 54.5% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 53.7% | 19% |
| 1960 | 52.9% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
