East Timor has a population density of 244 people per square mile compared to 200.5 people in Tanzania. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 148,726 sq ft in Tanzania. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, East Timor and Tanzania are ranked 99th and 113th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.84% of the population and 0.59% of the land area for Tanzania, hence the population density in East Timor is 21.7% higher than in Tanzania.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 244 ppl/mi² | 200.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 99/197 | 113/197 |
| Population |
1433311
|
72166806
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 342,009 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 139,070 sq ft |
| Rural population | 67.2% | 61.9% |
| Urban population | 32.8% | 38.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 6.88% |
East Timor vs Tanzania:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in East Timor increased by 50.8%, compared to a 79.9% growth in Tanzania.
In 2004, East Timor ranked 109th for population density and is in 99th place now. Tanzania was 130th in 2004 and ranks 113th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 244 | 200.5 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 194.8 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 189.2 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 183.7 |
| 2020 | 231 | 178.3 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 173 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 167.9 |
| 2017 | 218 | 162.7 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 157.4 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 152.1 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 147.2 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 142.8 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 138.5 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 134.6 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 130.9 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 127.6 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 124.5 |
| 2007 | 175 | 121.2 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 117.8 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 114.6 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 111.4 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 108.4 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 105.6 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 102.9 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 100.2 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 97.4 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 94.8 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 92.3 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 90.5 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 88.8 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 86.1 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 82.8 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 80.3 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | 78.3 |
| 1990 | 132.4 | 76.3 |
| 1989 | 129.7 | 74.4 |
| 1988 | 127.3 | 72.4 |
| 1987 | 125.1 | 70.3 |
| 1986 | 123.2 | 68 |
| 1985 | 121.3 | 65.8 |
| 1984 | 119.6 | 63.7 |
| 1983 | 118 | 61.6 |
| 1982 | 116.5 | 59.6 |
| 1981 | 115 | 57.8 |
| 1980 | 113.2 | 56.1 |
| 1979 | 111.2 | 54.4 |
| 1978 | 109.5 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 107.7 | 50.7 |
| 1976 | 105.8 | 48.9 |
| 1975 | 104.2 | 47.2 |
| 1974 | 102.9 | 45.5 |
| 1973 | 101.5 | 43.9 |
| 1972 | 99.8 | 42.3 |
| 1971 | 98.1 | 40.9 |
| 1970 | 96.3 | 39.5 |
| 1969 | 94.6 | 38.1 |
| 1968 | 93 | 36.8 |
| 1967 | 91.4 | 35.7 |
| 1966 | 89.8 | 34.6 |
| 1965 | 88.3 | 33.5 |
| 1964 | 86.9 | 32.5 |
| 1963 | 85.4 | 31.6 |
| 1962 | 84.1 | 30.7 |
| 1961 | 82.8 | 29.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 32.8% | 38.1% |
| 2023 | 32.5% | 37.4% |
| 2022 | 32.1% | 36.7% |
| 2021 | 31.7% | 36% |
| 2020 | 31.3% | 35.2% |
| 2019 | 30.9% | 34.5% |
| 2018 | 30.6% | 33.8% |
| 2017 | 30.2% | 33.1% |
| 2016 | 29.8% | 32.3% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 31.6% |
| 2014 | 29.1% | 30.9% |
| 2013 | 28.8% | 30.2% |
| 2012 | 28.4% | 29.5% |
| 2011 | 28.1% | 28.8% |
| 2010 | 27.7% | 28.1% |
| 2009 | 27.4% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 27% | 26.8% |
| 2007 | 26.7% | 26.1% |
| 2006 | 26.4% | 25.5% |
| 2005 | 26% | 24.8% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 24.2% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 23.6% |
| 2002 | 25% | 23% |
| 2001 | 24.6% | 22.7% |
| 2000 | 24.3% | 22.3% |
| 1999 | 23.9% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 23.6% | 21.6% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 21.2% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 20.9% |
| 1995 | 22.5% | 20.5% |
| 1994 | 22.2% | 20.2% |
| 1993 | 21.9% | 19.9% |
| 1992 | 21.5% | 19.5% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 19.2% |
| 1990 | 20.8% | 18.9% |
| 1989 | 20.4% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 19.9% | 18.2% |
| 1987 | 19.5% | 17.7% |
| 1986 | 19% | 17.2% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 16.8% |
| 1984 | 18.1% | 16.3% |
| 1983 | 17.7% | 15.9% |
| 1982 | 17.3% | 15.4% |
| 1981 | 16.9% | 15% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 14.6% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 14.1% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 13.7% |
| 1977 | 15.3% | 12.8% |
| 1976 | 15% | 11.9% |
| 1975 | 14.6% | 11.1% |
| 1974 | 14.2% | 10.4% |
| 1973 | 13.9% | 9.7% |
| 1972 | 13.5% | 9.05% |
| 1971 | 13.2% | 8.43% |
| 1970 | 12.9% | 7.85% |
| 1969 | 12.6% | 7.31% |
| 1968 | 12.3% | 6.8% |
| 1967 | 11.9% | 6.37% |
| 1966 | 11.6% | 6.2% |
| 1965 | 11.4% | 6.03% |
| 1964 | 11.1% | 5.87% |
| 1963 | 10.8% | 5.7% |
| 1962 | 10.5% | 5.55% |
| 1961 | 10.2% | 5.39% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 5.25% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor and from 24.2% to 38.1% in Tanzania.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons