East Timor has a population density of 244 people per square mile compared to 47.9 people in Finland. East Timor has 114,650 sq ft of land per person vs 648,293 sq ft in Finland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, East Timor and Finland are ranked 98th and 174th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. East Timor has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.2% of the land area for Finland, hence the population density in East Timor is 409% higher than in Finland.
Population density comparison
East Timor
|
Finland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 244 ppl/mi² | 47.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 98/197 | 174/197 |
| Population |
1437146
|
5624333
|
| Land area | 5,741 sq mi | 117,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 114,276 sq ft | 582,180 sq ft |
| Rural population | 71.3% | 25.7% |
| Urban population | 28.7% | 74.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
East Timor vs Finland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in East Timor increased by 50.8%, compared to a 7.72% growth in Finland.
In 2004, East Timor ranked 109th for population density and is in 98th place now. Finland was 157th in 2004 and ranks 174th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Finland
|
|
| 2024 | 244 | 47.9 |
| 2023 | 241.1 | 47.6 |
| 2022 | 238.5 | 47.3 |
| 2021 | 235.2 | 47.2 |
| 2020 | 231 | 47.1 |
| 2019 | 226.6 | 47.1 |
| 2018 | 222.2 | 47 |
| 2017 | 218 | 46.9 |
| 2016 | 213.9 | 46.8 |
| 2015 | 209.9 | 46.7 |
| 2014 | 205.9 | 46.5 |
| 2013 | 201.8 | 46.4 |
| 2012 | 197.7 | 46.1 |
| 2011 | 193.4 | 45.9 |
| 2010 | 188.9 | 45.7 |
| 2009 | 184.4 | 45.5 |
| 2008 | 179.8 | 45.3 |
| 2007 | 175 | 45 |
| 2006 | 170.1 | 44.9 |
| 2005 | 165.2 | 44.6 |
| 2004 | 161.8 | 44.5 |
| 2003 | 159.7 | 44.3 |
| 2002 | 153.1 | 44.2 |
| 2001 | 141.5 | 44.1 |
| 2000 | 129.8 | 44 |
| 1999 | 145.4 | 43.9 |
| 1998 | 164.2 | 43.8 |
| 1997 | 159.8 | 43.7 |
| 1996 | 155.4 | 43.6 |
| 1995 | 151.2 | 43.4 |
| 1994 | 147.1 | 43.3 |
| 1993 | 143.1 | 43.1 |
| 1992 | 139.2 | 42.9 |
| 1991 | 135.6 | 42.6 |
| 1990 | 132.4 | 42.4 |
| 1989 | 129.7 | 42.2 |
| 1988 | 127.3 | 42.1 |
| 1987 | 125.1 | 41.9 |
| 1986 | 123.2 | 41.8 |
| 1985 | 121.3 | 41.7 |
| 1984 | 119.6 | 41.5 |
| 1983 | 118 | 41.3 |
| 1982 | 116.5 | 41 |
| 1981 | 115 | 40.8 |
| 1980 | 113.2 | 40.6 |
| 1979 | 111.2 | 40.5 |
| 1978 | 109.5 | 40.4 |
| 1977 | 107.7 | 40.3 |
| 1976 | 105.8 | 40.2 |
| 1975 | 104.2 | 40.1 |
| 1974 | 102.9 | 39.9 |
| 1973 | 101.5 | 39.7 |
| 1972 | 99.8 | 39.5 |
| 1971 | 98.1 | 39.2 |
| 1970 | 96.3 | 39.2 |
| 1969 | 94.6 | 39.3 |
| 1968 | 93 | 39.3 |
| 1967 | 91.4 | 39.2 |
| 1966 | 89.8 | 39 |
| 1965 | 88.3 | 38.8 |
| 1964 | 86.9 | 38.7 |
| 1963 | 85.4 | 38.5 |
| 1962 | 84.1 | 38.2 |
| 1961 | 82.8 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
East Timor
|
Finland
|
|
| 2024 | 28.7% | 74.3% |
| 2023 | 28.6% | 74% |
| 2022 | 28.6% | 73.7% |
| 2021 | 28.8% | 73.4% |
| 2020 | 29% | 73.1% |
| 2019 | 29.1% | 72.7% |
| 2018 | 29.2% | 72.3% |
| 2017 | 29.4% | 72% |
| 2016 | 29.4% | 71.6% |
| 2015 | 29.5% | 71.3% |
| 2014 | 29.5% | 71% |
| 2013 | 29.6% | 70.7% |
| 2012 | 29.6% | 70.4% |
| 2011 | 29.6% | 70.1% |
| 2010 | 29.6% | 69.8% |
| 2009 | 29.4% | 69.5% |
| 2008 | 28.8% | 69.3% |
| 2007 | 28% | 69% |
| 2006 | 27.1% | 68.8% |
| 2005 | 26.3% | 68.5% |
| 2004 | 25.7% | 68.3% |
| 2003 | 25.3% | 68% |
| 2002 | 24.9% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 24.5% | 67.5% |
| 2000 | 24.1% | 67.1% |
| 1999 | 23.8% | 66.7% |
| 1998 | 23.5% | 66.2% |
| 1997 | 23.2% | 65.7% |
| 1996 | 22.9% | 65.2% |
| 1995 | 22.6% | 64.8% |
| 1994 | 22.3% | 64.5% |
| 1993 | 22% | 64.3% |
| 1992 | 21.7% | 64.1% |
| 1991 | 21.3% | 64% |
| 1990 | 21% | 63.9% |
| 1989 | 20.6% | 63.8% |
| 1988 | 20.3% | 63.8% |
| 1987 | 19.8% | 63.7% |
| 1986 | 19.4% | 63.6% |
| 1985 | 19% | 63.5% |
| 1984 | 18.5% | 63.4% |
| 1983 | 18.1% | 63.3% |
| 1982 | 17.6% | 63.2% |
| 1981 | 17.1% | 63.2% |
| 1980 | 16.6% | 63.1% |
| 1979 | 16.2% | 63% |
| 1978 | 15.7% | 62.9% |
| 1977 | 15.2% | 62.8% |
| 1976 | 14.7% | 62.6% |
| 1975 | 14.3% | 62.4% |
| 1974 | 13.8% | 62.1% |
| 1973 | 13.4% | 61.6% |
| 1972 | 13% | 61.1% |
| 1971 | 12.6% | 60.7% |
| 1970 | 12.2% | 60.3% |
| 1969 | 11.8% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 11.5% | 59.5% |
| 1967 | 11.2% | 59.1% |
| 1966 | 10.9% | 58.7% |
| 1965 | 10.7% | 58.3% |
| 1964 | 10.5% | 57.9% |
| 1963 | 10.3% | 57.4% |
| 1962 | 10.2% | 56.8% |
| 1961 | 10.1% | 56.3% |
| 1960 | 10.1% | 55.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 25.7% to 28.7% in East Timor and from 68.3% to 74.3% in Finland.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
