Chile has a population density of 68.9 people per square mile compared to 244 people in East Timor. Chile has 411,774 sq ft of land per person vs 114,650 sq ft in East Timor. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Chile and East Timor are ranked 162nd and 99th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Chile has 0.24% of the world's population and 0.5% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for East Timor, hence the population density in Chile is 71.8% lower than in East Timor.
Population density comparison
Chile
|
East Timor
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 68.9 ppl/mi² | 244 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 162/197 | 99/197 |
| Population |
19928941
|
1433311
|
| Land area | 286,809 sq mi | 5,741 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 404,547 sq ft | 114,276 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11.9% | 67.2% |
| Urban population | 88.1% | 32.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 31.7% | 0% |
Chile vs East Timor:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Chile increased by 22.2%, compared to a 50.8% growth in East Timor.
In 2004, Chile ranked 153rd for population density and is in 162nd place now. East Timor was 109th in 2004 and ranks 99th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 68.9 | 244 |
| 2023 | 68.5 | 241.1 |
| 2022 | 68.2 | 238.5 |
| 2021 | 67.8 | 235.2 |
| 2020 | 67.5 | 231 |
| 2019 | 66.9 | 226.6 |
| 2018 | 65.9 | 222.2 |
| 2017 | 64.8 | 218 |
| 2016 | 63.7 | 213.9 |
| 2015 | 63 | 209.9 |
| 2014 | 62.4 | 205.9 |
| 2013 | 61.6 | 201.8 |
| 2012 | 61 | 197.7 |
| 2011 | 60.4 | 193.4 |
| 2010 | 59.8 | 188.9 |
| 2009 | 59.3 | 184.4 |
| 2008 | 58.7 | 179.8 |
| 2007 | 58.1 | 175 |
| 2006 | 57.5 | 170.1 |
| 2005 | 56.9 | 165.2 |
| 2004 | 56.4 | 161.8 |
| 2003 | 55.8 | 159.7 |
| 2002 | 55.2 | 153.1 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 141.5 |
| 2000 | 54 | 129.8 |
| 1999 | 53.4 | 145.4 |
| 1998 | 52.7 | 164.2 |
| 1997 | 52 | 159.8 |
| 1996 | 51.3 | 155.4 |
| 1995 | 50.6 | 151.2 |
| 1994 | 49.9 | 147.1 |
| 1993 | 49.1 | 143.1 |
| 1992 | 48.4 | 139.2 |
| 1991 | 47.6 | 135.6 |
| 1990 | 46.8 | 132.4 |
| 1989 | 46 | 129.7 |
| 1988 | 45.3 | 127.3 |
| 1987 | 44.6 | 125.1 |
| 1986 | 43.9 | 123.2 |
| 1985 | 43.2 | 121.3 |
| 1984 | 42.5 | 119.6 |
| 1983 | 41.9 | 118 |
| 1982 | 41.3 | 116.5 |
| 1981 | 40.7 | 115 |
| 1980 | 40.1 | 113.2 |
| 1979 | 39.5 | 111.2 |
| 1978 | 38.9 | 109.5 |
| 1977 | 38.3 | 107.7 |
| 1976 | 37.8 | 105.8 |
| 1975 | 37.2 | 104.2 |
| 1974 | 36.6 | 102.9 |
| 1973 | 36 | 101.5 |
| 1972 | 35.4 | 99.8 |
| 1971 | 34.9 | 98.1 |
| 1970 | 34.3 | 96.3 |
| 1969 | 33.7 | 94.6 |
| 1968 | 33.1 | 93 |
| 1967 | 32.6 | 91.4 |
| 1966 | 32 | 89.8 |
| 1965 | 31.4 | 88.3 |
| 1964 | 30.8 | 86.9 |
| 1963 | 30.2 | 85.4 |
| 1962 | 29.6 | 84.1 |
| 1961 | 29 | 82.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
East Timor
|
|
| 2024 | 88.1% | 32.8% |
| 2023 | 88% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 87.9% | 32.1% |
| 2021 | 87.8% | 31.7% |
| 2020 | 87.7% | 31.3% |
| 2019 | 87.6% | 30.9% |
| 2018 | 87.6% | 30.6% |
| 2017 | 87.5% | 30.2% |
| 2016 | 87.4% | 29.8% |
| 2015 | 87.4% | 29.5% |
| 2014 | 87.3% | 29.1% |
| 2013 | 87.2% | 28.8% |
| 2012 | 87.2% | 28.4% |
| 2011 | 87.1% | 28.1% |
| 2010 | 87.1% | 27.7% |
| 2009 | 87% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 87% | 27% |
| 2007 | 86.9% | 26.7% |
| 2006 | 86.8% | 26.4% |
| 2005 | 86.8% | 26% |
| 2004 | 86.7% | 25.7% |
| 2003 | 86.7% | 25.3% |
| 2002 | 86.6% | 25% |
| 2001 | 86.4% | 24.6% |
| 2000 | 86.1% | 24.3% |
| 1999 | 85.8% | 23.9% |
| 1998 | 85.5% | 23.6% |
| 1997 | 85.2% | 23.2% |
| 1996 | 84.9% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 84.5% | 22.5% |
| 1994 | 84.2% | 22.2% |
| 1993 | 83.9% | 21.9% |
| 1992 | 83.6% | 21.5% |
| 1991 | 83.4% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 83.3% | 20.8% |
| 1989 | 83.1% | 20.4% |
| 1988 | 83% | 19.9% |
| 1987 | 82.9% | 19.5% |
| 1986 | 82.8% | 19% |
| 1985 | 82.6% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 82.5% | 18.1% |
| 1983 | 82.4% | 17.7% |
| 1982 | 82.2% | 17.3% |
| 1981 | 81.8% | 16.9% |
| 1980 | 81.2% | 16.5% |
| 1979 | 80.7% | 16.1% |
| 1978 | 80.1% | 15.7% |
| 1977 | 79.6% | 15.3% |
| 1976 | 79% | 15% |
| 1975 | 78.4% | 14.6% |
| 1974 | 77.8% | 14.2% |
| 1973 | 77.2% | 13.9% |
| 1972 | 76.5% | 13.5% |
| 1971 | 75.9% | 13.2% |
| 1970 | 75.2% | 12.9% |
| 1969 | 74.5% | 12.6% |
| 1968 | 73.9% | 12.3% |
| 1967 | 73.1% | 11.9% |
| 1966 | 72.4% | 11.6% |
| 1965 | 71.7% | 11.4% |
| 1964 | 71% | 11.1% |
| 1963 | 70.2% | 10.8% |
| 1962 | 69.4% | 10.5% |
| 1961 | 68.7% | 10.2% |
| 1960 | 67.8% | 10.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 86.7% to 88.1% in Chile and from 25.7% to 32.8% in East Timor.
Densely populated cities
|
Chile
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santiago | 6.26M |
| Puente Alto | 574K |
| Antofagasta | 349K |
| Vina del Mar | 333K |
| San Bernardo | 301K |
| Valparaiso | 297K |
| Temuco | 282K |
| Concepcion | 218K |
| Coquimbo | 204K |
| Arica | 202K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
