The DR Congo has a population density of 124.8 people per square mile compared to 77.5 people in Latvia. The DR Congo has 230,973 sq ft of land per person vs 373,317 sq ft in Latvia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the DR Congo and Latvia are ranked 139th and 155th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The DR Congo has 1.34% of the world's population and 1.52% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Latvia, hence the population density in the DR Congo is 61.1% higher than in Latvia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 124.8 ppl/mi² | 77.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 139/197 | 155/197 |
| Population |
115740092
|
1844219
|
| Land area | 875,313 sq mi | 24,027 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 223,309 sq ft | 359,656 sq ft |
| Rural population | 51.9% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 48.1% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.6% | 0% |
the DR Congo vs Latvia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the DR Congo increased by 91.7%, compared to a 17.7% decline in Latvia.
In 2004, the DR Congo ranked 149th for population density and is in 139th place now. Latvia was 135th in 2004 and ranks 155th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 124.8 | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 120.9 | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 117 | 78.2 |
| 2021 | 113.3 | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 109.7 | 79.1 |
| 2019 | 106.2 | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 102.9 | 80.2 |
| 2017 | 99.5 | 80.8 |
| 2016 | 95.9 | 81.6 |
| 2015 | 92.6 | 82.3 |
| 2014 | 89.6 | 83 |
| 2013 | 86.6 | 83.8 |
| 2012 | 83.7 | 84.7 |
| 2011 | 80.9 | 85.7 |
| 2010 | 78.3 | 87.3 |
| 2009 | 75.9 | 89.1 |
| 2008 | 73.6 | 90.6 |
| 2007 | 71.4 | 91.6 |
| 2006 | 69.3 | 92.3 |
| 2005 | 67.1 | 93.2 |
| 2004 | 65.1 | 94.2 |
| 2003 | 63.2 | 95.2 |
| 2002 | 61.4 | 96.2 |
| 2001 | 59.6 | 97.3 |
| 2000 | 57.7 | 98.5 |
| 1999 | 55.9 | 99.5 |
| 1998 | 54 | 100.3 |
| 1997 | 52.6 | 101.3 |
| 1996 | 51.7 | 102.3 |
| 1995 | 50.8 | 103.4 |
| 1994 | 48.7 | 104.9 |
| 1993 | 46.4 | 106.7 |
| 1992 | 44.8 | 108.8 |
| 1991 | 43.3 | - |
| 1990 | 41.9 | - |
| 1989 | 40.5 | - |
| 1988 | 39.3 | - |
| 1987 | 38 | - |
| 1986 | 36.9 | - |
| 1985 | 35.7 | - |
| 1984 | 34.6 | - |
| 1983 | 33.4 | - |
| 1982 | 32.4 | - |
| 1981 | 31.4 | - |
| 1980 | 30.5 | - |
| 1979 | 29.6 | - |
| 1978 | 28.6 | - |
| 1977 | 27.7 | - |
| 1976 | 27 | - |
| 1975 | 26.3 | - |
| 1974 | 25.6 | - |
| 1973 | 24.9 | - |
| 1972 | 24.3 | - |
| 1971 | 23.6 | - |
| 1970 | 23 | - |
| 1969 | 22.4 | - |
| 1968 | 21.7 | - |
| 1967 | 21.1 | - |
| 1966 | 20.5 | - |
| 1965 | 19.9 | - |
| 1964 | 19.4 | - |
| 1963 | 18.9 | - |
| 1962 | 18.4 | - |
| 1961 | 17.9 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48.1% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 47.4% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 46.8% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 46.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 | 45.6% | 68.3% |
| 2019 | 45% | 68.2% |
| 2018 | 44.5% | 68.1% |
| 2017 | 43.9% | 68.1% |
| 2016 | 43.3% | 68% |
| 2015 | 42.7% | 68% |
| 2014 | 42.2% | 68% |
| 2013 | 41.6% | 67.9% |
| 2012 | 41.1% | 67.9% |
| 2011 | 40.5% | 67.9% |
| 2010 | 40% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 39.5% | 67.8% |
| 2008 | 39% | 67.8% |
| 2007 | 38.5% | 67.9% |
| 2006 | 38% | 68% |
| 2005 | 37.5% | 68% |
| 2004 | 37% | 67.9% |
| 2003 | 36.5% | 67.8% |
| 2002 | 36.1% | 67.8% |
| 2001 | 35.6% | 67.9% |
| 2000 | 35.1% | 68.1% |
| 1999 | 34.7% | 68.2% |
| 1998 | 34.2% | 68.5% |
| 1997 | 33.7% | 68.6% |
| 1996 | 33.3% | 68.7% |
| 1995 | 32.8% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 32.4% | 68.9% |
| 1993 | 31.9% | 68.8% |
| 1992 | 31.5% | 68.9% |
| 1991 | 31.1% | 69.2% |
| 1990 | 30.6% | 69.2% |
| 1989 | 30.2% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 29.8% | 69.1% |
| 1987 | 29.3% | 68.9% |
| 1986 | 28.9% | 68.8% |
| 1985 | 28.5% | 68.6% |
| 1984 | 28.1% | 68.3% |
| 1983 | 27.8% | 68% |
| 1982 | 27.6% | 67.7% |
| 1981 | 27.3% | 67.4% |
| 1980 | 27.1% | 67.1% |
| 1979 | 26.8% | 66.7% |
| 1978 | 26.6% | 66.1% |
| 1977 | 26.3% | 65.5% |
| 1976 | 26.1% | 64.8% |
| 1975 | 25.8% | 64.2% |
| 1974 | 25.6% | 63.5% |
| 1973 | 25.3% | 62.8% |
| 1972 | 25.1% | 62.1% |
| 1971 | 24.8% | 61.4% |
| 1970 | 24.6% | 60.7% |
| 1969 | 24.4% | 59.9% |
| 1968 | 24.1% | 59.2% |
| 1967 | 23.9% | 58.4% |
| 1966 | 23.7% | 57.6% |
| 1965 | 23.4% | 56.8% |
| 1964 | 23.2% | 56% |
| 1963 | 23% | 55.3% |
| 1962 | 22.7% | 54.5% |
| 1961 | 22.5% | 53.7% |
| 1960 | 22.3% | 52.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 37% to 48.1% in the DR Congo and from 67.9% to 68.8% in Latvia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons