Lithuania has a population density of 119.5 people per square mile compared to 536 people in Nepal. Lithuania has 243,376 sq ft of land per person vs 53,430 sq ft in Nepal. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Lithuania and Nepal are ranked 142nd and 55th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Lithuania has 0.04% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.36% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Nepal, hence the population density in Lithuania is 77.7% lower than in Nepal.
Population density comparison
Lithuania
|
Nepal
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 119.5 ppl/mi² | 536 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 142/197 | 55/197 |
| Population |
2858798
|
29627185
|
| Land area | 24,170 sq mi | 55,348 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 233,313 sq ft | 52,039 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.1% | 77.6% |
| Urban population | 68.9% | 22.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Lithuania vs Nepal:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Lithuania decreased by 14.4%, compared to a 14% growth in Nepal.
In 2004, Lithuania ranked 119th for population density and is in 142nd place now. Nepal was 45th in 2004 and ranks 55th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Lithuania
|
Nepal
|
|
| 2024 | 119.5 | 536 |
| 2023 | 118.8 | 537 |
| 2022 | 117.1 | 537 |
| 2021 | 116.2 | 533 |
| 2020 | 116.2 | 523 |
| 2019 | 116.3 | 513 |
| 2018 | 116.6 | 507 |
| 2017 | 117.5 | 506 |
| 2016 | 119 | 505 |
| 2015 | 120.3 | 503 |
| 2014 | 121.4 | 500 |
| 2013 | 122.4 | 498 |
| 2012 | 123.5 | 497 |
| 2011 | 125.1 | 496 |
| 2010 | 128 | 494 |
| 2009 | 130.7 | 491 |
| 2008 | 132.2 | 488 |
| 2007 | 133.5 | 484 |
| 2006 | 135.1 | 480 |
| 2005 | 137.3 | 475 |
| 2004 | 139.5 | 470 |
| 2003 | 141.1 | 464 |
| 2002 | 142.3 | 458 |
| 2001 | 143.4 | 451 |
| 2000 | 144.6 | 443 |
| 1999 | 145.6 | 437 |
| 1998 | 146.7 | 429 |
| 1997 | 147.7 | 421 |
| 1996 | 148.8 | 412 |
| 1995 | 150 | 403 |
| 1994 | 151.1 | 393 |
| 1993 | 152.2 | 384 |
| 1992 | 152.9 | 373 |
| 1991 | - | 363 |
| 1990 | - | 354 |
| 1989 | - | 345 |
| 1988 | - | 338 |
| 1987 | - | 331 |
| 1986 | - | 324 |
| 1985 | - | 317 |
| 1984 | - | 309 |
| 1983 | - | 302 |
| 1982 | - | 295.2 |
| 1981 | - | 288.4 |
| 1980 | - | 281.7 |
| 1979 | - | 275.1 |
| 1978 | - | 268.8 |
| 1977 | - | 262.6 |
| 1976 | - | 256.8 |
| 1975 | - | 251.2 |
| 1974 | - | 245.7 |
| 1973 | - | 240.4 |
| 1972 | - | 235.3 |
| 1971 | - | 230.2 |
| 1970 | - | 225.2 |
| 1969 | - | 220.4 |
| 1968 | - | 215.6 |
| 1967 | - | 211.1 |
| 1966 | - | 206.6 |
| 1965 | - | 202.4 |
| 1964 | - | 198.3 |
| 1963 | - | 194.3 |
| 1962 | - | 190.6 |
| 1961 | - | 186.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Lithuania
|
Nepal
|
|
| 2024 | 68.9% | 22.4% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 21.9% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 21.5% |
| 2021 | 68.2% | 21% |
| 2020 | 68% | 20.6% |
| 2019 | 67.9% | 20.2% |
| 2018 | 67.7% | 19.7% |
| 2017 | 67.5% | 19.3% |
| 2016 | 67.4% | 18.9% |
| 2015 | 67.2% | 18.6% |
| 2014 | 67.1% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 67% | 17.8% |
| 2012 | 66.9% | 17.5% |
| 2011 | 66.7% | 17.1% |
| 2010 | 66.8% | 16.8% |
| 2009 | 66.8% | 16.4% |
| 2008 | 66.8% | 16.1% |
| 2007 | 66.8% | 15.8% |
| 2006 | 66.7% | 15.5% |
| 2005 | 66.6% | 15.1% |
| 2004 | 66.6% | 14.8% |
| 2003 | 66.7% | 14.5% |
| 2002 | 66.8% | 14.2% |
| 2001 | 66.9% | 13.9% |
| 2000 | 67% | 13.4% |
| 1999 | 67% | 12.9% |
| 1998 | 67.1% | 12.3% |
| 1997 | 67.2% | 11.8% |
| 1996 | 67.2% | 11.3% |
| 1995 | 67.3% | 10.9% |
| 1994 | 67.3% | 10.4% |
| 1993 | 67.4% | 10% |
| 1992 | 67.5% | 9.58% |
| 1991 | 67.5% | 9.18% |
| 1990 | 67.6% | 8.85% |
| 1989 | 67.6% | 8.54% |
| 1988 | 67.3% | 8.24% |
| 1987 | 66.5% | 7.94% |
| 1986 | 65.8% | 7.66% |
| 1985 | 65% | 7.39% |
| 1984 | 64.3% | 7.12% |
| 1983 | 63.5% | 6.86% |
| 1982 | 62.7% | 6.62% |
| 1981 | 61.9% | 6.38% |
| 1980 | 61.2% | 6.09% |
| 1979 | 60.4% | 5.82% |
| 1978 | 59.3% | 5.55% |
| 1977 | 58.1% | 5.3% |
| 1976 | 56.9% | 5.06% |
| 1975 | 55.7% | 4.83% |
| 1974 | 54.5% | 4.61% |
| 1973 | 53.2% | 4.4% |
| 1972 | 52% | 4.2% |
| 1971 | 50.7% | 4.01% |
| 1970 | 49.6% | 3.96% |
| 1969 | 48.5% | 3.91% |
| 1968 | 47.5% | 3.87% |
| 1967 | 46.5% | 3.82% |
| 1966 | 45.5% | 3.78% |
| 1965 | 44.5% | 3.74% |
| 1964 | 43.4% | 3.69% |
| 1963 | 42.4% | 3.65% |
| 1962 | 41.4% | 3.61% |
| 1961 | 40.4% | 3.57% |
| 1960 | 39.5% | 3.48% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66.6% to 68.9% in Lithuania and from 14.8% to 22.4% in Nepal.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
