Sri Lanka has a population density of 918 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Suriname. Sri Lanka has 32,224 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sri Lanka and Suriname are ranked 25th and 193rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sri Lanka has 0.27% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, hence the population density in Sri Lanka is 8,863% higher than in Suriname.
Population density comparison
Sri Lanka
|
Suriname
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 918 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 25/197 | 193/197 |
| Population |
22125995
|
644193
|
| Land area | 23,884 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,382 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 80.6% | 33.5% |
| Urban population | 19.4% | 66.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Sri Lanka vs Suriname:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sri Lanka increased by 10.6%, compared to a 23.4% growth in Suriname.
In 2004, Sri Lanka ranked 24th for population density and is in 25th place now. Suriname was 186th in 2004 and ranks 193rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 918 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 923 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 929 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 928 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 918 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 913 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 907 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 898 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 888 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 878 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 858 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 850 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 874 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 868 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | 862 | 8.87 |
| 2009 | 857 | 8.77 |
| 2008 | 852 | 8.67 |
| 2007 | 846 | 8.57 |
| 2006 | 841 | 8.47 |
| 2005 | 835 | 8.38 |
| 2004 | 830 | 8.29 |
| 2003 | 824 | 8.17 |
| 2002 | 818 | 8.01 |
| 2001 | 810 | 7.85 |
| 2000 | 797 | 7.69 |
| 1999 | 782 | 7.53 |
| 1998 | 768 | 7.38 |
| 1997 | 754 | 7.23 |
| 1996 | 739 | 7.08 |
| 1995 | 725 | 6.93 |
| 1994 | 714 | 6.82 |
| 1993 | 703 | 6.77 |
| 1992 | 691 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 680 | 6.7 |
| 1990 | 675 | 6.66 |
| 1989 | 671 | 6.59 |
| 1988 | 664 | 6.49 |
| 1987 | 657 | 6.4 |
| 1986 | 650 | 6.33 |
| 1985 | 642 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 638 | 6.17 |
| 1983 | 636 | 6.11 |
| 1982 | 631 | 6.08 |
| 1981 | 624 | 6.06 |
| 1980 | 613 | 6.06 |
| 1979 | 602 | 6.09 |
| 1978 | 591 | 6.16 |
| 1977 | 580 | 6.21 |
| 1976 | 570 | 6.27 |
| 1975 | 560 | 6.31 |
| 1974 | 550 | 6.35 |
| 1973 | 539 | 6.39 |
| 1972 | 529 | 6.41 |
| 1971 | 518 | 6.32 |
| 1970 | 507 | 6.12 |
| 1969 | 496 | 5.92 |
| 1968 | 485 | 5.72 |
| 1967 | 473 | 5.53 |
| 1966 | 462 | 5.34 |
| 1965 | 451 | 5.16 |
| 1964 | 440 | 4.99 |
| 1963 | 429 | 4.79 |
| 1962 | 419 | 4.58 |
| 1961 | 409 | 4.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 19.4% | 66.5% |
| 2023 | 19.2% | 66.4% |
| 2022 | 19% | 66.3% |
| 2021 | 18.9% | 66.2% |
| 2020 | 18.7% | 66.1% |
| 2019 | 18.6% | 66.1% |
| 2018 | 18.5% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 18.4% | 66% |
| 2016 | 18.3% | 66% |
| 2015 | 18.3% | 66.1% |
| 2014 | 18.2% | 66.1% |
| 2013 | 18.2% | 66.1% |
| 2012 | 18.2% | 66.2% |
| 2011 | 18.2% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 18.2% | 66.3% |
| 2009 | 18.2% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 18.3% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | 18.3% | 66.5% |
| 2006 | 18.3% | 66.6% |
| 2005 | 18.3% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 18.3% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 18.3% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 18.3% | 66.6% |
| 2001 | 18.4% | 66.5% |
| 2000 | 18.4% | 66.4% |
| 1999 | 18.4% | 66.4% |
| 1998 | 18.4% | 66.3% |
| 1997 | 18.4% | 66.2% |
| 1996 | 18.4% | 66.1% |
| 1995 | 18.5% | 66.1% |
| 1994 | 18.5% | 66% |
| 1993 | 18.5% | 65.9% |
| 1992 | 18.5% | 65.9% |
| 1991 | 18.5% | 65.8% |
| 1990 | 18.5% | 65.7% |
| 1989 | 18.6% | 65.6% |
| 1988 | 18.6% | 65.6% |
| 1987 | 18.6% | 65.5% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 65.4% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 65.3% |
| 1984 | 18.6% | 65.3% |
| 1983 | 18.6% | 65.2% |
| 1982 | 18.7% | 65.1% |
| 1981 | 18.7% | 65% |
| 1980 | 18.6% | 65% |
| 1979 | 18.5% | 62.8% |
| 1978 | 18.4% | 60.6% |
| 1977 | 18.3% | 58.3% |
| 1976 | 18.2% | 56.1% |
| 1975 | 18.1% | 53.7% |
| 1974 | 18% | 51.4% |
| 1973 | 17.9% | 49.1% |
| 1972 | 17.8% | 46.8% |
| 1971 | 17.7% | 45.7% |
| 1970 | 17.6% | 45.9% |
| 1969 | 17.5% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 17.4% | 46.4% |
| 1967 | 17.3% | 46.6% |
| 1966 | 17.2% | 46.9% |
| 1965 | 17.1% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 17% | 47.3% |
| 1963 | 16.9% | 47.4% |
| 1962 | 16.8% | 47.3% |
| 1961 | 16.6% | 47.3% |
| 1960 | 16.4% | 47.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka and from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname.
Densely populated cities
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
