Iceland has a population density of 9.93 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Suriname. Iceland has 2,868,586 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Iceland and Suriname are ranked 194th and 192nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Iceland has 0.005% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, hence the population density in Iceland is 3.02% lower than in Suriname.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.93 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 194/197 | 192/197 |
| Population |
395314
|
645315
|
| Land area | 38,931 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,808,042 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 5.82% | 34.2% |
| Urban population | 94.2% | 65.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Iceland vs Suriname:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Iceland increased by 31.6%, compared to a 23.4% growth in Suriname.
In 2004, Iceland ranked 188th for population density and is in 194th place now. Suriname was 186th in 2004 and ranks 192nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 9.93 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 9.91 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 9.81 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 9.57 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 9.41 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 9.26 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 9.06 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 8.87 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 8.67 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 8.55 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 8.46 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 8.36 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 8.29 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 8.24 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | 8.22 | 8.87 |
| 2009 | 8.23 | 8.77 |
| 2008 | 8.2 | 8.67 |
| 2007 | 8.05 | 8.57 |
| 2006 | 7.85 | 8.47 |
| 2005 | 7.67 | 8.38 |
| 2004 | 7.55 | 8.29 |
| 2003 | 7.48 | 8.17 |
| 2002 | 7.43 | 8.01 |
| 2001 | 7.36 | 7.85 |
| 2000 | 7.27 | 7.69 |
| 1999 | 7.17 | 7.53 |
| 1998 | 7.08 | 7.38 |
| 1997 | 7 | 7.23 |
| 1996 | 6.95 | 7.08 |
| 1995 | 6.91 | 6.93 |
| 1994 | 6.87 | 6.82 |
| 1993 | 6.81 | 6.77 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 6.66 | 6.7 |
| 1990 | 6.58 | 6.66 |
| 1989 | 6.53 | 6.59 |
| 1988 | 6.45 | 6.49 |
| 1987 | 6.35 | 6.4 |
| 1986 | 6.28 | 6.33 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 6.19 | 6.17 |
| 1983 | 6.12 | 6.11 |
| 1982 | 6.04 | 6.08 |
| 1981 | 5.96 | 6.06 |
| 1980 | 5.89 | 6.06 |
| 1979 | 5.83 | 6.09 |
| 1978 | 5.78 | 6.16 |
| 1977 | 5.73 | 6.21 |
| 1976 | 5.69 | 6.27 |
| 1975 | 5.63 | 6.31 |
| 1974 | 5.56 | 6.35 |
| 1973 | 5.49 | 6.39 |
| 1972 | 5.4 | 6.41 |
| 1971 | 5.32 | 6.32 |
| 1970 | 5.28 | 6.12 |
| 1969 | 5.25 | 5.92 |
| 1968 | 5.21 | 5.72 |
| 1967 | 5.13 | 5.53 |
| 1966 | 5.05 | 5.34 |
| 1965 | 4.97 | 5.16 |
| 1964 | 4.88 | 4.99 |
| 1963 | 4.8 | 4.79 |
| 1962 | 4.71 | 4.58 |
| 1961 | 4.63 | 4.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 94.2% | 65.8% |
| 2023 | 94.2% | 65.8% |
| 2022 | 94.2% | 65.9% |
| 2021 | 94.2% | 66% |
| 2020 | 94.1% | 66% |
| 2019 | 94% | 66% |
| 2018 | 93.9% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 93.8% | 66.1% |
| 2016 | 93.8% | 66.1% |
| 2015 | 93.7% | 66.2% |
| 2014 | 93.6% | 66.2% |
| 2013 | 93.6% | 66.3% |
| 2012 | 93.5% | 66.3% |
| 2011 | 93.4% | 66.4% |
| 2010 | 93.5% | 66.4% |
| 2009 | 93.4% | 66.5% |
| 2008 | 93.1% | 66.6% |
| 2007 | 92.4% | 66.6% |
| 2006 | 92.2% | 66.7% |
| 2005 | 92.4% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 92.4% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 92.3% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 92.2% | 66.7% |
| 2001 | 92% | 66.7% |
| 2000 | 92% | 66.7% |
| 1999 | 91.8% | 66.7% |
| 1998 | 91.7% | 66.7% |
| 1997 | 92% | 66.6% |
| 1996 | 91.8% | 66.6% |
| 1995 | 91.6% | 66.6% |
| 1994 | 91.4% | 66.5% |
| 1993 | 91.3% | 66.5% |
| 1992 | 91.1% | 66.5% |
| 1991 | 90.9% | 66.4% |
| 1990 | 90.6% | 66.4% |
| 1989 | 90.4% | 66.3% |
| 1988 | 90.1% | 66.3% |
| 1987 | 89.8% | 66.3% |
| 1986 | 89.6% | 66.2% |
| 1985 | 89.3% | 66.2% |
| 1984 | 89.1% | 66.2% |
| 1983 | 88.9% | 66.1% |
| 1982 | 88.6% | 66.1% |
| 1981 | 88.3% | 66.1% |
| 1980 | 88.1% | 66.1% |
| 1979 | 87.9% | 66% |
| 1978 | 87.7% | 66% |
| 1977 | 87.4% | 66% |
| 1976 | 87.2% | 66% |
| 1975 | 86.9% | 66% |
| 1974 | 86.5% | 66% |
| 1973 | 86.2% | 66% |
| 1972 | 85.7% | 65.9% |
| 1971 | 85.3% | 65.9% |
| 1970 | 85% | 65.9% |
| 1969 | 84.8% | 65.9% |
| 1968 | 84.4% | 65.9% |
| 1967 | 83.9% | 65.9% |
| 1966 | 83.5% | 65.9% |
| 1965 | 83.2% | 65.8% |
| 1964 | 82.7% | 65.8% |
| 1963 | 82% | 65.6% |
| 1962 | 81.5% | 64.6% |
| 1961 | 81% | 63% |
| 1960 | 80.4% | 61% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 92.4% to 94.2% in Iceland and from 66.7% to 65.8% in Suriname.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons