Sri Lanka has a population density of 918 people per square mile compared to 375 people in Tonga. Sri Lanka has 32,224 sq ft of land per person vs 77,340 sq ft in Tonga. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sri Lanka and Tonga are ranked 25th and 68th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sri Lanka has 0.27% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.001% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Tonga, hence the population density in Sri Lanka is 144.9% higher than in Tonga.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 918 ppl/mi² | 375 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 25/197 | 68/197 |
| Population |
22125995
|
103744
|
| Land area | 23,884 sq mi | 278 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,382 sq ft | 74,394 sq ft |
| Rural population | 80.6% | 76.8% |
| Urban population | 19.4% | 23.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Sri Lanka vs Tonga:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sri Lanka increased by 10.6%, compared to a 0.85% decline in Tonga.
In 2004, Sri Lanka ranked 24th for population density and is in 25th place now. Tonga was 54th in 2004 and ranks 68th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 918 | 375 |
| 2023 | 923 | 376 |
| 2022 | 929 | 378 |
| 2021 | 928 | 379 |
| 2020 | 918 | 380 |
| 2019 | 913 | 380 |
| 2018 | 907 | 380 |
| 2017 | 898 | 379 |
| 2016 | 888 | 380 |
| 2015 | 878 | 382 |
| 2014 | 858 | 383 |
| 2013 | 850 | 385 |
| 2012 | 874 | 387 |
| 2011 | 868 | 387 |
| 2010 | 862 | 386 |
| 2009 | 857 | 386 |
| 2008 | 852 | 385 |
| 2007 | 846 | 384 |
| 2006 | 841 | 382 |
| 2005 | 835 | 380 |
| 2004 | 830 | 378 |
| 2003 | 824 | 376 |
| 2002 | 818 | 374 |
| 2001 | 810 | 372 |
| 2000 | 797 | 369 |
| 1999 | 782 | 367 |
| 1998 | 768 | 365 |
| 1997 | 754 | 362 |
| 1996 | 739 | 361 |
| 1995 | 725 | 361 |
| 1994 | 714 | 360 |
| 1993 | 703 | 360 |
| 1992 | 691 | 360 |
| 1991 | 680 | 359 |
| 1990 | 675 | 359 |
| 1989 | 671 | 358 |
| 1988 | 664 | 356 |
| 1987 | 657 | 354 |
| 1986 | 650 | 353 |
| 1985 | 642 | 352 |
| 1984 | 638 | 352 |
| 1983 | 636 | 353 |
| 1982 | 631 | 352 |
| 1981 | 624 | 352 |
| 1980 | 613 | 352 |
| 1979 | 602 | 351 |
| 1978 | 591 | 350 |
| 1977 | 580 | 348 |
| 1976 | 570 | 343 |
| 1975 | 560 | 335 |
| 1974 | 550 | 326 |
| 1973 | 539 | 319 |
| 1972 | 529 | 314 |
| 1971 | 518 | 309 |
| 1970 | 507 | 304 |
| 1969 | 496 | 298.2 |
| 1968 | 485 | 292.6 |
| 1967 | 473 | 287.1 |
| 1966 | 462 | 280.6 |
| 1965 | 451 | 273.1 |
| 1964 | 440 | 265.8 |
| 1963 | 429 | 258.6 |
| 1962 | 419 | 251.6 |
| 1961 | 409 | 244.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 19.4% | 23.2% |
| 2023 | 19.2% | 23.2% |
| 2022 | 19% | 23.1% |
| 2021 | 18.9% | 23.1% |
| 2020 | 18.7% | 23.1% |
| 2019 | 18.6% | 23.1% |
| 2018 | 18.5% | 23.1% |
| 2017 | 18.4% | 23.2% |
| 2016 | 18.3% | 23.2% |
| 2015 | 18.3% | 23.3% |
| 2014 | 18.2% | 23.3% |
| 2013 | 18.2% | 23.4% |
| 2012 | 18.2% | 23.4% |
| 2011 | 18.2% | 23.4% |
| 2010 | 18.2% | 23.4% |
| 2009 | 18.2% | 23.3% |
| 2008 | 18.3% | 23.3% |
| 2007 | 18.3% | 23.2% |
| 2006 | 18.3% | 23.2% |
| 2005 | 18.3% | 23.2% |
| 2004 | 18.3% | 23.1% |
| 2003 | 18.3% | 23.1% |
| 2002 | 18.3% | 23.1% |
| 2001 | 18.4% | 23% |
| 2000 | 18.4% | 23% |
| 1999 | 18.4% | 23% |
| 1998 | 18.4% | 23% |
| 1997 | 18.4% | 22.9% |
| 1996 | 18.4% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 18.5% | 22.9% |
| 1994 | 18.5% | 22.8% |
| 1993 | 18.5% | 22.8% |
| 1992 | 18.5% | 22.8% |
| 1991 | 18.5% | 22.7% |
| 1990 | 18.5% | 22.7% |
| 1989 | 18.6% | 22.7% |
| 1988 | 18.6% | 22.6% |
| 1987 | 18.6% | 22.6% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 22.5% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 22.3% |
| 1984 | 18.6% | 22% |
| 1983 | 18.6% | 21.8% |
| 1982 | 18.7% | 21.6% |
| 1981 | 18.7% | 21.4% |
| 1980 | 18.6% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 18.5% | 20.9% |
| 1978 | 18.4% | 20.7% |
| 1977 | 18.3% | 20.5% |
| 1976 | 18.2% | 20.4% |
| 1975 | 18.1% | 20.3% |
| 1974 | 18% | 20.3% |
| 1973 | 17.9% | 20.3% |
| 1972 | 17.8% | 20.2% |
| 1971 | 17.7% | 20.2% |
| 1970 | 17.6% | 20.2% |
| 1969 | 17.5% | 20.2% |
| 1968 | 17.4% | 20.1% |
| 1967 | 17.3% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 17.2% | 19.9% |
| 1965 | 17.1% | 19.5% |
| 1964 | 17% | 19.1% |
| 1963 | 16.9% | 18.7% |
| 1962 | 16.8% | 18.3% |
| 1961 | 16.6% | 17.9% |
| 1960 | 16.4% | 17.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka and from 23.1% to 23.2% in Tonga.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons