El Salvador has a population density of 792 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Suriname. El Salvador has 35,733 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, El Salvador and Suriname are ranked 33rd and 193rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. El Salvador has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, hence the population density in El Salvador is 7,639% higher than in Suriname.
Population density comparison
El Salvador
|
Suriname
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 792 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 33/197 | 193/197 |
| Population |
6386184
|
644193
|
| Land area | 8,000 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 35,188 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 24% | 33.5% |
| Urban population | 76% | 66.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
El Salvador vs Suriname:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in El Salvador increased by 5.55%, compared to a 23.4% growth in Suriname.
In 2004, El Salvador ranked 27th for population density and is in 33rd place now. Suriname was 186th in 2004 and ranks 193rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
El Salvador
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 792 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 789 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 785 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 782 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 779 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 778 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 777 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 777 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 775 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 773 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 770 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 767 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 764 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 761 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | 759 | 8.87 |
| 2009 | 756 | 8.77 |
| 2008 | 754 | 8.67 |
| 2007 | 751 | 8.57 |
| 2006 | 750 | 8.47 |
| 2005 | 751 | 8.38 |
| 2004 | 751 | 8.29 |
| 2003 | 750 | 8.17 |
| 2002 | 748 | 8.01 |
| 2001 | 746 | 7.85 |
| 2000 | 743 | 7.69 |
| 1999 | 739 | 7.53 |
| 1998 | 735 | 7.38 |
| 1997 | 731 | 7.23 |
| 1996 | 726 | 7.08 |
| 1995 | 720 | 6.93 |
| 1994 | 714 | 6.82 |
| 1993 | 707 | 6.77 |
| 1992 | 698 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 687 | 6.7 |
| 1990 | 675 | 6.66 |
| 1989 | 662 | 6.59 |
| 1988 | 649 | 6.49 |
| 1987 | 637 | 6.4 |
| 1986 | 624 | 6.33 |
| 1985 | 612 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 600 | 6.17 |
| 1983 | 588 | 6.11 |
| 1982 | 578 | 6.08 |
| 1981 | 571 | 6.06 |
| 1980 | 568 | 6.06 |
| 1979 | 560 | 6.09 |
| 1978 | 549 | 6.16 |
| 1977 | 538 | 6.21 |
| 1976 | 526 | 6.27 |
| 1975 | 512 | 6.31 |
| 1974 | 501 | 6.35 |
| 1973 | 489 | 6.39 |
| 1972 | 478 | 6.41 |
| 1971 | 467 | 6.32 |
| 1970 | 456 | 6.12 |
| 1969 | 444 | 5.92 |
| 1968 | 432 | 5.72 |
| 1967 | 421 | 5.53 |
| 1966 | 409 | 5.34 |
| 1965 | 397 | 5.16 |
| 1964 | 387 | 4.99 |
| 1963 | 376 | 4.79 |
| 1962 | 366 | 4.58 |
| 1961 | 357 | 4.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
El Salvador
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 76% | 66.5% |
| 2023 | 75.4% | 66.4% |
| 2022 | 74.8% | 66.3% |
| 2021 | 74.1% | 66.2% |
| 2020 | 73.4% | 66.1% |
| 2019 | 72.7% | 66.1% |
| 2018 | 72% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 71.3% | 66% |
| 2016 | 70.5% | 66% |
| 2015 | 69.7% | 66.1% |
| 2014 | 68.9% | 66.1% |
| 2013 | 68% | 66.1% |
| 2012 | 67.2% | 66.2% |
| 2011 | 66.3% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 65.5% | 66.3% |
| 2009 | 64.6% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 63.7% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | 62.8% | 66.5% |
| 2006 | 62.2% | 66.6% |
| 2005 | 61.6% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 61.1% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 60.6% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 60% | 66.6% |
| 2001 | 59.5% | 66.5% |
| 2000 | 58.9% | 66.4% |
| 1999 | 58.4% | 66.4% |
| 1998 | 57.8% | 66.3% |
| 1997 | 56.5% | 66.2% |
| 1996 | 55.3% | 66.1% |
| 1995 | 54% | 66.1% |
| 1994 | 52.7% | 66% |
| 1993 | 51.4% | 65.9% |
| 1992 | 50.3% | 65.9% |
| 1991 | 49.8% | 65.8% |
| 1990 | 49.3% | 65.7% |
| 1989 | 48.8% | 65.6% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 65.6% |
| 1987 | 47.7% | 65.5% |
| 1986 | 47.2% | 65.4% |
| 1985 | 46.7% | 65.3% |
| 1984 | 46.2% | 65.3% |
| 1983 | 45.6% | 65.2% |
| 1982 | 45.1% | 65.1% |
| 1981 | 44.6% | 65% |
| 1980 | 44.1% | 65% |
| 1979 | 43.6% | 62.8% |
| 1978 | 43.1% | 60.6% |
| 1977 | 42.6% | 58.3% |
| 1976 | 42.1% | 56.1% |
| 1975 | 41.6% | 53.7% |
| 1974 | 41% | 51.4% |
| 1973 | 40.5% | 49.1% |
| 1972 | 40% | 46.8% |
| 1971 | 39.5% | 45.7% |
| 1970 | 39.4% | 45.9% |
| 1969 | 39.3% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 46.4% |
| 1967 | 39.1% | 46.6% |
| 1966 | 39% | 46.9% |
| 1965 | 38.9% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 38.8% | 47.3% |
| 1963 | 38.7% | 47.4% |
| 1962 | 38.6% | 47.3% |
| 1961 | 38.5% | 47.3% |
| 1960 | 38.4% | 47.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 61.1% to 76% in El Salvador and from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname.
Densely populated cities
|
El Salvador
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Salvador | 331K |
| Santa Ana | 251K |
| San Miguel | 233K |
| Soyapango | 230K |
| Mejicanos | 137K |
| Apopa | 129K |
| Ahuachapan | 127K |
| Santa Tecla | 126K |
| Sonsonate | 72.2K |
| Usulutan | 66.1K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
