Sri Lanka has a population density of 918 people per square mile compared to 833 people in Tuvalu. Sri Lanka has 32,224 sq ft of land per person vs 28,054 sq ft in Tuvalu. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sri Lanka and Tuvalu are ranked 25th and 31st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sri Lanka has 0.27% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0001% of the population and 0.00002% of the land area for Tuvalu, hence the population density in Sri Lanka is 10.2% higher than in Tuvalu.
Population density comparison
Sri Lanka
|
Tuvalu
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 918 ppl/mi² | 833 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 25/197 | 31/197 |
| Population |
22125995
|
9493
|
| Land area | 23,884 sq mi | 11.6 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,382 sq ft | 33,477 sq ft |
| Rural population | 80.6% | 33.1% |
| Urban population | 19.4% | 66.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Sri Lanka vs Tuvalu:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sri Lanka increased by 10.6%, compared to a 1.73% decline in Tuvalu.
In 2004, Sri Lanka ranked 24th for population density and is in 25th place now. Tuvalu was 21st in 2004 and ranks 31st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Tuvalu
|
|
| 2024 | 918 | 833 |
| 2023 | 923 | 847 |
| 2022 | 929 | 863 |
| 2021 | 928 | 880 |
| 2020 | 918 | 898 |
| 2019 | 913 | 913 |
| 2018 | 907 | 928 |
| 2017 | 898 | 938 |
| 2016 | 888 | 944 |
| 2015 | 878 | 946 |
| 2014 | 858 | 948 |
| 2013 | 850 | 950 |
| 2012 | 874 | 944 |
| 2011 | 868 | 931 |
| 2010 | 862 | 916 |
| 2009 | 857 | 903 |
| 2008 | 852 | 891 |
| 2007 | 846 | 879 |
| 2006 | 841 | 868 |
| 2005 | 835 | 858 |
| 2004 | 830 | 847 |
| 2003 | 824 | 837 |
| 2002 | 818 | 831 |
| 2001 | 810 | 828 |
| 2000 | 797 | 824 |
| 1999 | 782 | 820 |
| 1998 | 768 | 816 |
| 1997 | 754 | 812 |
| 1996 | 739 | 807 |
| 1995 | 725 | 801 |
| 1994 | 714 | 795 |
| 1993 | 703 | 788 |
| 1992 | 691 | 780 |
| 1991 | 680 | 771 |
| 1990 | 675 | 760 |
| 1989 | 671 | 748 |
| 1988 | 664 | 735 |
| 1987 | 657 | 723 |
| 1986 | 650 | 709 |
| 1985 | 642 | 695 |
| 1984 | 638 | 682 |
| 1983 | 636 | 672 |
| 1982 | 631 | 662 |
| 1981 | 624 | 650 |
| 1980 | 613 | 636 |
| 1979 | 602 | 620 |
| 1978 | 591 | 601 |
| 1977 | 580 | 577 |
| 1976 | 570 | 553 |
| 1975 | 560 | 528 |
| 1974 | 550 | 503 |
| 1973 | 539 | 490 |
| 1972 | 529 | 491 |
| 1971 | 518 | 491 |
| 1970 | 507 | 489 |
| 1969 | 496 | 486 |
| 1968 | 485 | 486 |
| 1967 | 473 | 488 |
| 1966 | 462 | 491 |
| 1965 | 451 | 493 |
| 1964 | 440 | 497 |
| 1963 | 429 | 497 |
| 1962 | 419 | 492 |
| 1961 | 409 | 488 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Tuvalu
|
|
| 2024 | 19.4% | 66.9% |
| 2023 | 19.2% | 66.2% |
| 2022 | 19% | 65.5% |
| 2021 | 18.9% | 64.8% |
| 2020 | 18.7% | 64% |
| 2019 | 18.6% | 63.2% |
| 2018 | 18.5% | 62.4% |
| 2017 | 18.4% | 61.5% |
| 2016 | 18.3% | 60.6% |
| 2015 | 18.3% | 59.7% |
| 2014 | 18.2% | 58.8% |
| 2013 | 18.2% | 57.8% |
| 2012 | 18.2% | 56.8% |
| 2011 | 18.2% | 55.8% |
| 2010 | 18.2% | 54.8% |
| 2009 | 18.2% | 53.8% |
| 2008 | 18.3% | 52.8% |
| 2007 | 18.3% | 51.7% |
| 2006 | 18.3% | 50.7% |
| 2005 | 18.3% | 49.7% |
| 2004 | 18.3% | 48.7% |
| 2003 | 18.3% | 47.7% |
| 2002 | 18.3% | 46.8% |
| 2001 | 18.4% | 46.4% |
| 2000 | 18.4% | 46% |
| 1999 | 18.4% | 45.6% |
| 1998 | 18.4% | 45.2% |
| 1997 | 18.4% | 44.8% |
| 1996 | 18.4% | 44.4% |
| 1995 | 18.5% | 44% |
| 1994 | 18.5% | 43.6% |
| 1993 | 18.5% | 43.2% |
| 1992 | 18.5% | 42.8% |
| 1991 | 18.5% | 42% |
| 1990 | 18.5% | 40.7% |
| 1989 | 18.6% | 39.3% |
| 1988 | 18.6% | 38% |
| 1987 | 18.6% | 36.8% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 35.5% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 34.3% |
| 1984 | 18.6% | 33.3% |
| 1983 | 18.6% | 32.4% |
| 1982 | 18.7% | 31.6% |
| 1981 | 18.7% | 30.7% |
| 1980 | 18.6% | 29.8% |
| 1979 | 18.5% | 29% |
| 1978 | 18.4% | 28.2% |
| 1977 | 18.3% | 27.3% |
| 1976 | 18.2% | 26.5% |
| 1975 | 18.1% | 25.8% |
| 1974 | 18% | 25% |
| 1973 | 17.9% | 24.2% |
| 1972 | 17.8% | 23.5% |
| 1971 | 17.7% | 22.8% |
| 1970 | 17.6% | 22.1% |
| 1969 | 17.5% | 21.4% |
| 1968 | 17.4% | 20.7% |
| 1967 | 17.3% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 17.2% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 17.1% | 18.8% |
| 1964 | 17% | 18.2% |
| 1963 | 16.9% | 17.6% |
| 1962 | 16.8% | 17% |
| 1961 | 16.6% | 16.4% |
| 1960 | 16.4% | 15.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka and from 48.7% to 66.9% in Tuvalu.
Densely populated cities
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
