Curacao has a population density of 909 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Suriname. Curacao has 30,655 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and Suriname are ranked 26th and 193rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, hence the population density in Curacao is 8,783% higher than in Suriname.
Population density comparison
Curacao
|
Suriname
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 193/197 |
| Population |
155910
|
644193
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,655 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 33.5% |
| Urban population | 89% | 66.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Curacao vs Suriname:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.36%, compared to a 14.1% growth in Suriname.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. Suriname was 190th in 2011 and ranks 193rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 909 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 909 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 875 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 889 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 904 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 918 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 929 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 934 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 931 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 922 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 909 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 897 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 887 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 880 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | - | 8.87 |
| 2009 | - | 8.77 |
| 2008 | - | 8.67 |
| 2007 | - | 8.57 |
| 2006 | - | 8.47 |
| 2005 | - | 8.38 |
| 2004 | - | 8.29 |
| 2003 | - | 8.17 |
| 2002 | - | 8.01 |
| 2001 | - | 7.85 |
| 2000 | - | 7.69 |
| 1999 | - | 7.53 |
| 1998 | - | 7.38 |
| 1997 | - | 7.23 |
| 1996 | - | 7.08 |
| 1995 | - | 6.93 |
| 1994 | - | 6.82 |
| 1993 | - | 6.77 |
| 1992 | - | 6.74 |
| 1991 | - | 6.7 |
| 1990 | - | 6.66 |
| 1989 | - | 6.59 |
| 1988 | - | 6.49 |
| 1987 | - | 6.4 |
| 1986 | - | 6.33 |
| 1985 | - | 6.24 |
| 1984 | - | 6.17 |
| 1983 | - | 6.11 |
| 1982 | - | 6.08 |
| 1981 | - | 6.06 |
| 1980 | - | 6.06 |
| 1979 | - | 6.09 |
| 1978 | - | 6.16 |
| 1977 | - | 6.21 |
| 1976 | - | 6.27 |
| 1975 | - | 6.31 |
| 1974 | - | 6.35 |
| 1973 | - | 6.39 |
| 1972 | - | 6.41 |
| 1971 | - | 6.32 |
| 1970 | - | 6.12 |
| 1969 | - | 5.92 |
| 1968 | - | 5.72 |
| 1967 | - | 5.53 |
| 1966 | - | 5.34 |
| 1965 | - | 5.16 |
| 1964 | - | 4.99 |
| 1963 | - | 4.79 |
| 1962 | - | 4.58 |
| 1961 | - | 4.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 66.5% |
| 2023 | 89% | 66.4% |
| 2022 | 89% | 66.3% |
| 2021 | 89% | 66.2% |
| 2020 | 89.1% | 66.1% |
| 2019 | 89.1% | 66.1% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 89.2% | 66% |
| 2016 | 89.3% | 66% |
| 2015 | 89.4% | 66.1% |
| 2014 | 89.4% | 66.1% |
| 2013 | 89.5% | 66.1% |
| 2012 | 89.7% | 66.2% |
| 2011 | 89.8% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 89.9% | 66.3% |
| 2009 | 90% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 90.2% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | 90.3% | 66.5% |
| 2006 | 90.4% | 66.6% |
| 2005 | 90.5% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 90.7% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 90.8% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 90.9% | 66.6% |
| 2001 | 91% | 66.5% |
| 2000 | 90.8% | 66.4% |
| 1999 | 90.2% | 66.4% |
| 1998 | 89.6% | 66.3% |
| 1997 | 89% | 66.2% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 66.1% |
| 1995 | 87.7% | 66.1% |
| 1994 | 87% | 66% |
| 1993 | 86.2% | 65.9% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 65.9% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 65.8% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 65.7% |
| 1989 | 84.4% | 65.6% |
| 1988 | 84.1% | 65.6% |
| 1987 | 83.8% | 65.5% |
| 1986 | 83.6% | 65.4% |
| 1985 | 83.3% | 65.3% |
| 1984 | 83% | 65.3% |
| 1983 | 82.7% | 65.2% |
| 1982 | 82.4% | 65.1% |
| 1981 | 82.1% | 65% |
| 1980 | 81.8% | 65% |
| 1979 | 81.5% | 62.8% |
| 1978 | 81.1% | 60.6% |
| 1977 | 80.8% | 58.3% |
| 1976 | 80.5% | 56.1% |
| 1975 | 80.2% | 53.7% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 51.4% |
| 1973 | 79.5% | 49.1% |
| 1972 | 79.1% | 46.8% |
| 1971 | 78.8% | 45.7% |
| 1970 | 78.4% | 45.9% |
| 1969 | 78.1% | 46.2% |
| 1968 | 77.7% | 46.4% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 46.6% |
| 1966 | 77% | 46.9% |
| 1965 | 76.6% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 76.3% | 47.3% |
| 1963 | 75.9% | 47.4% |
| 1962 | 75.5% | 47.3% |
| 1961 | 75.1% | 47.3% |
| 1960 | 74.7% | 47.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao and from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
