Curacao has a population density of 909 people per square mile compared to 918 people in Sri Lanka. Curacao has 30,655 sq ft of land per person vs 32,224 sq ft in Sri Lanka. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and Sri Lanka are ranked 26th and 25th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.27% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Sri Lanka, hence the population density in Curacao is 0.89% lower than in Sri Lanka.
Population density comparison
Curacao
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 909 ppl/mi² | 918 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 25/197 |
| Population |
155910
|
22125995
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 23,884 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,655 sq ft | 30,382 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 80.6% |
| Urban population | 89% | 19.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Curacao vs Sri Lanka:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.36%, compared to a 5.75% growth in Sri Lanka.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. Sri Lanka was 27th in 2011 and ranks 25th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 909 | 918 |
| 2023 | 909 | 923 |
| 2022 | 875 | 929 |
| 2021 | 889 | 928 |
| 2020 | 904 | 918 |
| 2019 | 918 | 913 |
| 2018 | 929 | 907 |
| 2017 | 934 | 898 |
| 2016 | 931 | 888 |
| 2015 | 922 | 878 |
| 2014 | 909 | 858 |
| 2013 | 897 | 850 |
| 2012 | 887 | 874 |
| 2011 | 880 | 868 |
| 2010 | - | 862 |
| 2009 | - | 857 |
| 2008 | - | 852 |
| 2007 | - | 846 |
| 2006 | - | 841 |
| 2005 | - | 835 |
| 2004 | - | 830 |
| 2003 | - | 824 |
| 2002 | - | 818 |
| 2001 | - | 810 |
| 2000 | - | 797 |
| 1999 | - | 782 |
| 1998 | - | 768 |
| 1997 | - | 754 |
| 1996 | - | 739 |
| 1995 | - | 725 |
| 1994 | - | 714 |
| 1993 | - | 703 |
| 1992 | - | 691 |
| 1991 | - | 680 |
| 1990 | - | 675 |
| 1989 | - | 671 |
| 1988 | - | 664 |
| 1987 | - | 657 |
| 1986 | - | 650 |
| 1985 | - | 642 |
| 1984 | - | 638 |
| 1983 | - | 636 |
| 1982 | - | 631 |
| 1981 | - | 624 |
| 1980 | - | 613 |
| 1979 | - | 602 |
| 1978 | - | 591 |
| 1977 | - | 580 |
| 1976 | - | 570 |
| 1975 | - | 560 |
| 1974 | - | 550 |
| 1973 | - | 539 |
| 1972 | - | 529 |
| 1971 | - | 518 |
| 1970 | - | 507 |
| 1969 | - | 496 |
| 1968 | - | 485 |
| 1967 | - | 473 |
| 1966 | - | 462 |
| 1965 | - | 451 |
| 1964 | - | 440 |
| 1963 | - | 429 |
| 1962 | - | 419 |
| 1961 | - | 409 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 19.4% |
| 2023 | 89% | 19.2% |
| 2022 | 89% | 19% |
| 2021 | 89% | 18.9% |
| 2020 | 89.1% | 18.7% |
| 2019 | 89.1% | 18.6% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 18.5% |
| 2017 | 89.2% | 18.4% |
| 2016 | 89.3% | 18.3% |
| 2015 | 89.4% | 18.3% |
| 2014 | 89.4% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 89.5% | 18.2% |
| 2012 | 89.7% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 89.8% | 18.2% |
| 2010 | 89.9% | 18.2% |
| 2009 | 90% | 18.2% |
| 2008 | 90.2% | 18.3% |
| 2007 | 90.3% | 18.3% |
| 2006 | 90.4% | 18.3% |
| 2005 | 90.5% | 18.3% |
| 2004 | 90.7% | 18.3% |
| 2003 | 90.8% | 18.3% |
| 2002 | 90.9% | 18.3% |
| 2001 | 91% | 18.4% |
| 2000 | 90.8% | 18.4% |
| 1999 | 90.2% | 18.4% |
| 1998 | 89.6% | 18.4% |
| 1997 | 89% | 18.4% |
| 1996 | 88.4% | 18.4% |
| 1995 | 87.7% | 18.5% |
| 1994 | 87% | 18.5% |
| 1993 | 86.2% | 18.5% |
| 1992 | 85.4% | 18.5% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 18.5% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 18.5% |
| 1989 | 84.4% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 84.1% | 18.6% |
| 1987 | 83.8% | 18.6% |
| 1986 | 83.6% | 18.6% |
| 1985 | 83.3% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 83% | 18.6% |
| 1983 | 82.7% | 18.6% |
| 1982 | 82.4% | 18.7% |
| 1981 | 82.1% | 18.7% |
| 1980 | 81.8% | 18.6% |
| 1979 | 81.5% | 18.5% |
| 1978 | 81.1% | 18.4% |
| 1977 | 80.8% | 18.3% |
| 1976 | 80.5% | 18.2% |
| 1975 | 80.2% | 18.1% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 18% |
| 1973 | 79.5% | 17.9% |
| 1972 | 79.1% | 17.8% |
| 1971 | 78.8% | 17.7% |
| 1970 | 78.4% | 17.6% |
| 1969 | 78.1% | 17.5% |
| 1968 | 77.7% | 17.4% |
| 1967 | 77.4% | 17.3% |
| 1966 | 77% | 17.2% |
| 1965 | 76.6% | 17.1% |
| 1964 | 76.3% | 17% |
| 1963 | 75.9% | 16.9% |
| 1962 | 75.5% | 16.8% |
| 1961 | 75.1% | 16.6% |
| 1960 | 74.7% | 16.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 90.7% to 89% in Curacao and from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka.
Densely populated cities
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
