Demographics of Sri Lanka compared to Suriname:
- As of 2025, the population of Sri Lanka is 22.1M vs 644K in Suriname - 34.3 times difference.
- The median age in Sri Lanka is 34.1 years compared to 29.4 years in Suriname.
- Sri Lanka is ranked 81/196 by median age (oldest to youngest) vs 109/196 for Suriname.
- The average life expectancy at birth in Sri Lanka is 77.9 years, compared to 73.9 years in Suriname.
- The share of old-age demographic (65+) in Sri Lanka is 12.1% vs 7.9% in Suriname.
- The share of young demographic (0-15 years old) in Sri Lanka is 22% vs 25.6% in Suriname.
- Sri Lanka has 14.6M working age adults (aged 15-64) vs 428K in Suriname.
- The average number of children born to each woman is 1.97 in Sri Lanka compared to 2.25 in Suriname.
Demographic data comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population |
22125995
|
644193
|
| Median age | 34.1 years | 29.4 years |
| Median age rank | 81/196 | 109/196 |
| Average age | 35.8 years | 32.3 years |
| Average age rank | 76/196 | 103/196 |
| Age dependency ratio | 51.8% | 50.5% |
| Young-age dependency ratio | 33.4% | 38.6% |
| Old-age dependency ratio | 18.4% | 11.9% |
| Male:Female ratio | 48.4:51.6 | 50:50 |
| Population density | 354 ppl/mi² | 3.95 ppl/mi² |
| Fertility rate | 1.97 | 2.25 |
| Life expectancy | 77.9 years | 73.9 years |
Median age history and projection chart in
Sri Lanka vs Suriname
| Year | Median age | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 19.5 | 18.1 |
| 1961 | 19.5 | 18.2 |
| 1962 | 19.5 | 17.8 |
| 1963 | 19.5 | 17.3 |
| 1964 | 19.5 | 16.8 |
| 1965 | 19.5 | 16.4 |
| 1966 | 19.6 | 16.1 |
| 1967 | 19.7 | 15.8 |
| 1968 | 19.8 | 15.6 |
| 1969 | 19.9 | 15.6 |
| 1970 | 20 | 15.6 |
| 1971 | 20.1 | 15.7 |
| 1972 | 20.2 | 16 |
| 1973 | 20.4 | 16.3 |
| 1974 | 20.6 | 16.7 |
| 1975 | 20.7 | 17 |
| 1976 | 20.9 | 17.4 |
| 1977 | 21 | 17.6 |
| 1978 | 21.2 | 17.9 |
| 1979 | 21.3 | 18.1 |
| 1980 | 21.5 | 18.4 |
| 1981 | 21.6 | 18.7 |
| 1982 | 21.7 | 18.9 |
| 1983 | 21.9 | 19.2 |
| 1984 | 22 | 19.5 |
| 1985 | 22.2 | 19.7 |
| 1986 | 22.5 | 20 |
| 1987 | 22.8 | 20.2 |
| 1988 | 23.1 | 20.4 |
| 1989 | 23.4 | 20.6 |
| 1990 | 23.6 | 20.8 |
| 1991 | 23.9 | 21 |
| 1992 | 24.3 | 21.2 |
| 1993 | 24.6 | 21.5 |
| 1994 | 24.9 | 21.7 |
| 1995 | 25.3 | 22 |
| 1996 | 25.8 | 22.4 |
| 1997 | 26.2 | 22.8 |
| 1998 | 26.5 | 23.2 |
| 1999 | 26.9 | 23.6 |
| 2000 | 27.2 | 24 |
| 2001 | 27.6 | 24.4 |
| 2002 | 27.9 | 24.7 |
| 2003 | 28.2 | 25 |
| 2004 | 28.5 | 25.3 |
| 2005 | 28.8 | 25.5 |
| 2006 | 29 | 25.6 |
| 2007 | 29.3 | 25.8 |
| 2008 | 29.6 | 26.1 |
| 2009 | 29.9 | 26.3 |
| 2010 | 30.2 | 26.5 |
| 2011 | 30.5 | 26.7 |
| 2012 | 30.8 | 26.9 |
| 2013 | 31.1 | 27.1 |
| 2014 | 31.4 | 27.3 |
| 2015 | 31.7 | 27.5 |
| 2016 | 32 | 27.7 |
| 2017 | 32.3 | 27.9 |
| 2018 | 32.5 | 28.1 |
| 2019 | 32.8 | 28.3 |
| 2020 | 33.1 | 28.6 |
| 2021 | 33.3 | 28.7 |
| 2022 | 33.6 | 28.9 |
| 2023 | 33.8 | 29.2 |
| 2024 | 34.1 | 29.4 |
| 2025 | 34.3 | 29.6 |
| 2026 | 34.6 | 29.9 |
| 2027 | 34.9 | 30.2 |
| 2028 | 35.2 | 30.5 |
| 2029 | 35.5 | 30.8 |
| 2030 | 35.8 | 31.1 |
| 2031 | 36.1 | 31.5 |
| 2032 | 36.3 | 31.8 |
| 2033 | 36.6 | 32.1 |
| 2034 | 36.9 | 32.4 |
| 2035 | 37.1 | 32.8 |
| 2036 | 37.4 | 33.1 |
| 2037 | 37.6 | 33.3 |
| 2038 | 37.8 | 33.6 |
| 2039 | 38.1 | 33.9 |
| 2040 | 38.3 | 34.1 |
| 2041 | 38.6 | 34.4 |
| 2042 | 38.9 | 34.7 |
| 2043 | 39.1 | 35 |
| 2044 | 39.4 | 35.2 |
| 2045 | 39.7 | 35.5 |
| 2046 | 40 | 35.8 |
| 2047 | 40.3 | 36 |
| 2048 | 40.6 | 36.3 |
| 2049 | 40.9 | 36.6 |
| 2050 | 41.2 | 36.8 |
In 1960, the median age in Sri Lanka was 19.5 years compared to 18.1 years in Suriname. As of 2024, the median age had increased to 34.1 years in Sri Lanka and to 29.4 years in Suriname.
According to United Nations projections, the median age in Sri Lanka is expected to increased to around 41.2 years by 2050 compared to 36.8 years in Suriname. The aging demographics forecast is based on previous years' birth rates and increasing life expectancy.
Demographic pyramid: age and gender distribution
| Age range | Share of population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 0-4 | 3.58% | 3.44% | 4.28% | 4.13% |
| 5-9 | 3.73% | 3.58% | 4.34% | 4.18% |
| 10-14 | 3.92% | 3.79% | 4.43% | 4.28% |
| 15-19 | 3.96% | 3.87% | 4.35% | 4.23% |
| 20-24 | 3.73% | 3.64% | 4.39% | 4.31% |
| 25-29 | 3.58% | 3.53% | 4.06% | 3.99% |
| 30-34 | 3.39% | 3.52% | 3.56% | 3.43% |
| 35-39 | 3.21% | 3.47% | 3.5% | 3.34% |
| 40-44 | 3.42% | 3.67% | 3.4% | 3.14% |
| 45-49 | 3.15% | 3.38% | 2.81% | 2.78% |
| 50-54 | 2.77% | 3% | 2.89% | 2.78% |
| 55-59 | 2.61% | 2.91% | 2.58% | 2.57% |
| 60-64 | 2.32% | 2.74% | 2.12% | 2.23% |
| 65-69 | 1.94% | 2.42% | 1.39% | 1.71% |
| 70-74 | 1.46% | 1.99% | 0.9% | 1.21% |
| 75-79 | 0.93% | 1.42% | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| 80+ | 0.69% | 1.26% | 0.46% | 0.95% |
The chart above is a variation of a population pyramid and represents a comparison of age and gender structure. Sri Lanka has low demographic potential with 51.2% of people in the 0-34 age group compared to 58% and average potential in Suriname.
Age dependency chart
| Year | Age dependency ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total | Young | Old | Total | Young | Old | |
| 1960 | 82.4% | 74.7% | 7.71% | 98.2% | 88.3% | 9.9% |
| 1961 | 82% | 74.5% | 7.47% | 99.6% | 88.9% | 10.6% |
| 1962 | 81.3% | 74% | 7.25% | 102.4% | 91.3% | 11% |
| 1963 | 80.6% | 73.5% | 7.07% | 106% | 95% | 11.1% |
| 1964 | 80% | 73.1% | 6.94% | 108.5% | 97.6% | 10.9% |
| 1965 | 79.7% | 72.9% | 6.85% | 110.4% | 99.8% | 10.6% |
| 1966 | 79.3% | 72.5% | 6.79% | 112% | 101.8% | 10.2% |
| 1967 | 78.8% | 72.1% | 6.75% | 113.2% | 103.4% | 9.86% |
| 1968 | 78.3% | 71.6% | 6.75% | 113.8% | 104.3% | 9.52% |
| 1969 | 77.7% | 71% | 6.75% | 113.6% | 104.4% | 9.19% |
| 1970 | 77.1% | 70.3% | 6.77% | 112.5% | 103.7% | 8.9% |
| 1971 | 76.5% | 69.7% | 6.8% | 110.8% | 102.1% | 8.65% |
| 1972 | 75.7% | 68.9% | 6.84% | 107.7% | 99.2% | 8.47% |
| 1973 | 74.7% | 67.9% | 6.88% | 103.8% | 95.5% | 8.37% |
| 1974 | 73.6% | 66.7% | 6.92% | 100.4% | 92.1% | 8.31% |
| 1975 | 72.5% | 65.5% | 6.98% | 97.2% | 89% | 8.27% |
| 1976 | 71.6% | 64.5% | 7.05% | 94.2% | 86% | 8.24% |
| 1977 | 70.7% | 63.6% | 7.14% | 91.2% | 83% | 8.21% |
| 1978 | 70.1% | 62.8% | 7.25% | 88.4% | 80.2% | 8.18% |
| 1979 | 69.6% | 62.2% | 7.36% | 85.8% | 77.7% | 8.16% |
| 1980 | 69.1% | 61.6% | 7.49% | 82.7% | 74.8% | 7.84% |
| 1981 | 68.8% | 61.1% | 7.64% | 79.2% | 71.9% | 7.25% |
| 1982 | 68.5% | 60.7% | 7.81% | 76.4% | 69.7% | 6.76% |
| 1983 | 68.2% | 60.2% | 8.01% | 74.3% | 67.9% | 6.35% |
| 1984 | 67.9% | 59.7% | 8.23% | 72.7% | 66.6% | 6.02% |
| 1985 | 67.2% | 58.8% | 8.42% | 71.4% | 65.6% | 5.76% |
| 1986 | 66% | 57.5% | 8.55% | 70.3% | 64.8% | 5.58% |
| 1987 | 64.8% | 56.1% | 8.67% | 69.5% | 64.1% | 5.44% |
| 1988 | 63.6% | 54.8% | 8.81% | 69% | 63.6% | 5.35% |
| 1989 | 62.5% | 53.6% | 8.93% | 68.6% | 63.3% | 5.29% |
| 1990 | 61.7% | 52.6% | 9.1% | 68.2% | 63% | 5.25% |
| 1991 | 60.8% | 51.6% | 9.26% | 67.9% | 62.6% | 5.23% |
| 1992 | 59.3% | 50% | 9.32% | 67.5% | 62.3% | 5.21% |
| 1993 | 57.6% | 48.3% | 9.35% | 67.3% | 62.1% | 5.22% |
| 1994 | 56% | 46.6% | 9.39% | 67.2% | 61.9% | 5.24% |
| 1995 | 54.5% | 45.1% | 9.39% | 66.5% | 61.1% | 5.39% |
| 1996 | 53.2% | 43.9% | 9.34% | 65.3% | 59.6% | 5.67% |
| 1997 | 52.2% | 42.9% | 9.3% | 63.9% | 57.9% | 6% |
| 1998 | 51.3% | 42% | 9.28% | 62.4% | 56.1% | 6.36% |
| 1999 | 50.5% | 41.2% | 9.27% | 61% | 54.3% | 6.76% |
| 2000 | 49.7% | 40.4% | 9.29% | 59.9% | 52.7% | 7.19% |
| 2001 | 49% | 39.7% | 9.34% | 59% | 51.4% | 7.62% |
| 2002 | 48.5% | 39.1% | 9.43% | 58.4% | 50.3% | 8.08% |
| 2003 | 48.3% | 38.7% | 9.55% | 58% | 49.4% | 8.57% |
| 2004 | 48.1% | 38.4% | 9.67% | 57.7% | 48.9% | 8.82% |
| 2005 | 48.1% | 38.3% | 9.8% | 57.6% | 48.7% | 8.84% |
| 2006 | 48.1% | 38.1% | 9.98% | 57.4% | 48.5% | 8.9% |
| 2007 | 48.2% | 38% | 10.2% | 57.3% | 48.4% | 8.97% |
| 2008 | 48.4% | 38% | 10.4% | 57.2% | 48.1% | 9.04% |
| 2009 | 48.6% | 37.9% | 10.7% | 57% | 47.9% | 9.1% |
| 2010 | 48.9% | 37.9% | 11.1% | 56.6% | 47.5% | 9.16% |
| 2011 | 49.2% | 37.8% | 11.5% | 56.1% | 46.9% | 9.21% |
| 2012 | 49.6% | 37.7% | 11.9% | 55.5% | 46.3% | 9.25% |
| 2013 | 50% | 37.5% | 12.4% | 54.8% | 45.6% | 9.27% |
| 2014 | 50.4% | 37.4% | 13% | 54.1% | 44.8% | 9.31% |
| 2015 | 50.8% | 37.2% | 13.6% | 53.4% | 44% | 9.4% |
| 2016 | 51.1% | 37% | 14.1% | 52.7% | 43.2% | 9.55% |
| 2017 | 51.3% | 36.7% | 14.7% | 52.2% | 42.4% | 9.75% |
| 2018 | 51.5% | 36.3% | 15.2% | 51.7% | 41.7% | 9.99% |
| 2019 | 51.6% | 35.9% | 15.7% | 51.4% | 41.1% | 10.2% |
| 2020 | 51.6% | 35.4% | 16.2% | 51.1% | 40.5% | 10.6% |
| 2021 | 51.7% | 34.9% | 16.8% | 50.8% | 40% | 10.8% |
| 2022 | 51.7% | 34.4% | 17.3% | 50.6% | 39.5% | 11.1% |
| 2023 | 51.7% | 33.9% | 17.8% | 50.5% | 39.1% | 11.5% |
| 2024 | 51.8% | 33.4% | 18.4% | 50.5% | 38.6% | 11.9% |
Age dependency is the ratio of people not in the labor force (children under 15 and adults 64+) to people aged 15 to 64.
Age dependency in Sri Lanka increased from 48.1% to 51.8% between 2004 and 2024.
In Suriname, the ratio of dependent people decreased from 57.7% to 50.5% between 2004 and 2024 with a decreased share of young people and an increased proportion of people aged 65+.
Working age demographic
| Year | Working age population share | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 54.8% | 50.5% |
| 1961 | 55% | 50.1% |
| 1962 | 55.2% | 49.4% |
| 1963 | 55.4% | 48.5% |
| 1964 | 55.5% | 48% |
| 1965 | 55.6% | 47.5% |
| 1966 | 55.8% | 47.2% |
| 1967 | 55.9% | 46.9% |
| 1968 | 56.1% | 46.8% |
| 1969 | 56.3% | 46.8% |
| 1970 | 56.5% | 47% |
| 1971 | 56.7% | 47.4% |
| 1972 | 56.9% | 48.2% |
| 1973 | 57.2% | 49.1% |
| 1974 | 57.6% | 49.9% |
| 1975 | 58% | 50.7% |
| 1976 | 58.3% | 51.5% |
| 1977 | 58.6% | 52.3% |
| 1978 | 58.8% | 53.1% |
| 1979 | 59% | 53.8% |
| 1980 | 59.1% | 54.7% |
| 1981 | 59.3% | 55.8% |
| 1982 | 59.4% | 56.7% |
| 1983 | 59.5% | 57.4% |
| 1984 | 59.6% | 57.9% |
| 1985 | 59.8% | 58.4% |
| 1986 | 60.2% | 58.7% |
| 1987 | 60.7% | 59% |
| 1988 | 61.1% | 59.2% |
| 1989 | 61.5% | 59.3% |
| 1990 | 61.8% | 59.5% |
| 1991 | 62.2% | 59.6% |
| 1992 | 62.8% | 59.7% |
| 1993 | 63.5% | 59.8% |
| 1994 | 64.1% | 59.8% |
| 1995 | 64.7% | 60.1% |
| 1996 | 65.3% | 60.5% |
| 1997 | 65.7% | 61% |
| 1998 | 66.1% | 61.6% |
| 1999 | 66.4% | 62.1% |
| 2000 | 66.8% | 62.6% |
| 2001 | 67.1% | 62.9% |
| 2002 | 67.3% | 63.1% |
| 2003 | 67.4% | 63.3% |
| 2004 | 67.5% | 63.4% |
| 2005 | 67.5% | 63.5% |
| 2006 | 67.5% | 63.5% |
| 2007 | 67.5% | 63.6% |
| 2008 | 67.4% | 63.6% |
| 2009 | 67.3% | 63.7% |
| 2010 | 67.2% | 63.9% |
| 2011 | 67% | 64.1% |
| 2012 | 66.9% | 64.3% |
| 2013 | 66.7% | 64.6% |
| 2014 | 66.5% | 64.9% |
| 2015 | 66.3% | 65.2% |
| 2016 | 66.2% | 65.5% |
| 2017 | 66.1% | 65.7% |
| 2018 | 66% | 65.9% |
| 2019 | 66% | 66.1% |
| 2020 | 65.9% | 66.2% |
| 2021 | 65.9% | 66.3% |
| 2022 | 65.9% | 66.4% |
| 2023 | 65.9% | 66.4% |
| 2024 | 65.9% | 66.5% |
| 2025 | 65.8% | 66.5% |
| 2026 | 65.8% | 66.4% |
| 2027 | 65.7% | 66.4% |
| 2028 | 65.7% | 66.3% |
| 2029 | 65.7% | 66.3% |
| 2030 | 65.6% | 66.2% |
| 2031 | 65.5% | 66.1% |
| 2032 | 65.4% | 66% |
| 2033 | 65.3% | 65.9% |
| 2034 | 65.2% | 65.8% |
| 2035 | 65.1% | 65.7% |
| 2036 | 65% | 65.6% |
| 2037 | 64.9% | 65.5% |
| 2038 | 64.8% | 65.4% |
| 2039 | 64.7% | 65.3% |
| 2040 | 64.5% | 65.3% |
| 2041 | 64.4% | 65.3% |
| 2042 | 64.2% | 65.4% |
| 2043 | 63.9% | 65.4% |
| 2044 | 63.7% | 65.4% |
| 2045 | 63.4% | 65.4% |
| 2046 | 63.1% | 65.4% |
| 2047 | 62.9% | 65.4% |
| 2048 | 62.7% | 65.3% |
| 2049 | 62.5% | 65.2% |
| 2050 | 62.4% | 65.1% |
Between 2004 and 2024, the share of working-age demographics aged 15-64 changed from 67.5% to 65.9% in Sri Lanka and from 63.4% to 66.5% in Suriname.
Share of young demographic (0-14 years old)
| Year | Share of people 0-14 years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 41% | 44.5% |
| 1961 | 40.9% | 44.6% |
| 1962 | 40.8% | 45.1% |
| 1963 | 40.7% | 46.1% |
| 1964 | 40.6% | 46.8% |
| 1965 | 40.5% | 47.4% |
| 1966 | 40.4% | 48% |
| 1967 | 40.3% | 48.5% |
| 1968 | 40.1% | 48.8% |
| 1969 | 39.9% | 48.9% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 48.8% |
| 1971 | 39.5% | 48.5% |
| 1972 | 39.2% | 47.8% |
| 1973 | 38.8% | 46.8% |
| 1974 | 38.4% | 46% |
| 1975 | 38% | 45.1% |
| 1976 | 37.6% | 44.3% |
| 1977 | 37.2% | 43.4% |
| 1978 | 36.9% | 42.6% |
| 1979 | 36.7% | 41.8% |
| 1980 | 36.4% | 41% |
| 1981 | 36.2% | 40.1% |
| 1982 | 36% | 39.5% |
| 1983 | 35.8% | 39% |
| 1984 | 35.5% | 38.6% |
| 1985 | 35.2% | 38.3% |
| 1986 | 34.6% | 38% |
| 1987 | 34% | 37.8% |
| 1988 | 33.5% | 37.7% |
| 1989 | 33% | 37.5% |
| 1990 | 32.5% | 37.4% |
| 1991 | 32.1% | 37.3% |
| 1992 | 31.4% | 37.2% |
| 1993 | 30.6% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 29.9% | 37% |
| 1995 | 29.2% | 36.7% |
| 1996 | 28.6% | 36.1% |
| 1997 | 28.2% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 27.8% | 34.5% |
| 1999 | 27.4% | 33.7% |
| 2000 | 27% | 33% |
| 2001 | 26.6% | 32.3% |
| 2002 | 26.3% | 31.8% |
| 2003 | 26.1% | 31.3% |
| 2004 | 26% | 31% |
| 2005 | 25.8% | 30.9% |
| 2006 | 25.7% | 30.8% |
| 2007 | 25.7% | 30.7% |
| 2008 | 25.6% | 30.6% |
| 2009 | 25.5% | 30.5% |
| 2010 | 25.4% | 30.3% |
| 2011 | 25.3% | 30% |
| 2012 | 25.2% | 29.8% |
| 2013 | 25% | 29.4% |
| 2014 | 24.9% | 29.1% |
| 2015 | 24.7% | 28.7% |
| 2016 | 24.5% | 28.3% |
| 2017 | 24.2% | 27.9% |
| 2018 | 24% | 27.5% |
| 2019 | 23.7% | 27.2% |
| 2020 | 23.3% | 26.8% |
| 2021 | 23% | 26.5% |
| 2022 | 22.7% | 26.3% |
| 2023 | 22.4% | 25.9% |
| 2024 | 22% | 25.6% |
| 2025 | 21.7% | 25.3% |
| 2026 | 21.4% | 25% |
| 2027 | 21.1% | 24.8% |
| 2028 | 20.8% | 24.5% |
| 2029 | 20.5% | 24.2% |
| 2030 | 20.2% | 23.9% |
| 2031 | 20% | 23.6% |
| 2032 | 19.8% | 23.4% |
| 2033 | 19.6% | 23.2% |
| 2034 | 19.4% | 23% |
| 2035 | 19.2% | 22.8% |
| 2036 | 19.1% | 22.6% |
| 2037 | 18.9% | 22.4% |
| 2038 | 18.8% | 22.2% |
| 2039 | 18.7% | 22% |
| 2040 | 18.6% | 21.8% |
| 2041 | 18.4% | 21.6% |
| 2042 | 18.3% | 21.4% |
| 2043 | 18.2% | 21.3% |
| 2044 | 18.1% | 21.1% |
| 2045 | 18% | 20.9% |
| 2046 | 17.9% | 20.7% |
| 2047 | 17.7% | 20.5% |
| 2048 | 17.6% | 20.3% |
| 2049 | 17.5% | 20.1% |
| 2050 | 17.3% | 19.9% |
The share of young people aged below 15 is 22% in Sri Lanka and 25.6% in Suriname. Birth rates in Sri Lanka compared to Suriname .
Share of old population (65+)
| Year | Share of population 65+ years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 4.22% | 5% |
| 1961 | 4.1% | 5.33% |
| 1962 | 4% | 5.45% |
| 1963 | 3.92% | 5.36% |
| 1964 | 3.85% | 5.23% |
| 1965 | 3.81% | 5.03% |
| 1966 | 3.78% | 4.82% |
| 1967 | 3.78% | 4.63% |
| 1968 | 3.78% | 4.45% |
| 1969 | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| 1970 | 3.82% | 4.19% |
| 1971 | 3.86% | 4.1% |
| 1972 | 3.89% | 4.08% |
| 1973 | 3.94% | 4.11% |
| 1974 | 3.99% | 4.15% |
| 1975 | 4.04% | 4.2% |
| 1976 | 4.11% | 4.25% |
| 1977 | 4.18% | 4.29% |
| 1978 | 4.26% | 4.34% |
| 1979 | 4.34% | 4.39% |
| 1980 | 4.43% | 4.29% |
| 1981 | 4.52% | 4.05% |
| 1982 | 4.63% | 3.83% |
| 1983 | 4.76% | 3.64% |
| 1984 | 4.9% | 3.48% |
| 1985 | 5.04% | 3.36% |
| 1986 | 5.15% | 3.27% |
| 1987 | 5.26% | 3.21% |
| 1988 | 5.38% | 3.17% |
| 1989 | 5.5% | 3.14% |
| 1990 | 5.62% | 3.12% |
| 1991 | 5.76% | 3.11% |
| 1992 | 5.85% | 3.11% |
| 1993 | 5.93% | 3.12% |
| 1994 | 6.02% | 3.13% |
| 1995 | 6.08% | 3.23% |
| 1996 | 6.09% | 3.43% |
| 1997 | 6.11% | 3.66% |
| 1998 | 6.13% | 3.92% |
| 1999 | 6.16% | 4.2% |
| 2000 | 6.21% | 4.49% |
| 2001 | 6.27% | 4.8% |
| 2002 | 6.35% | 5.1% |
| 2003 | 6.44% | 5.42% |
| 2004 | 6.53% | 5.59% |
| 2005 | 6.62% | 5.61% |
| 2006 | 6.74% | 5.65% |
| 2007 | 6.87% | 5.7% |
| 2008 | 7.03% | 5.75% |
| 2009 | 7.21% | 5.8% |
| 2010 | 7.43% | 5.85% |
| 2011 | 7.68% | 5.9% |
| 2012 | 7.97% | 5.95% |
| 2013 | 8.29% | 5.99% |
| 2014 | 8.64% | 6.04% |
| 2015 | 8.99% | 6.13% |
| 2016 | 9.35% | 6.25% |
| 2017 | 9.69% | 6.41% |
| 2018 | 10% | 6.59% |
| 2019 | 10.4% | 6.77% |
| 2020 | 10.7% | 6.98% |
| 2021 | 11% | 7.16% |
| 2022 | 11.4% | 7.36% |
| 2023 | 11.7% | 7.62% |
| 2024 | 12.1% | 7.9% |
| 2025 | 12.5% | 8.19% |
| 2026 | 12.8% | 8.51% |
| 2027 | 13.2% | 8.84% |
| 2028 | 13.5% | 9.2% |
| 2029 | 13.9% | 9.56% |
| 2030 | 14.2% | 9.92% |
| 2031 | 14.5% | 10.3% |
| 2032 | 14.8% | 10.6% |
| 2033 | 15.1% | 10.9% |
| 2034 | 15.4% | 11.2% |
| 2035 | 15.7% | 11.5% |
| 2036 | 16% | 11.8% |
| 2037 | 16.2% | 12.1% |
| 2038 | 16.4% | 12.4% |
| 2039 | 16.7% | 12.6% |
| 2040 | 16.9% | 12.8% |
| 2041 | 17.2% | 13% |
| 2042 | 17.5% | 13.2% |
| 2043 | 17.9% | 13.3% |
| 2044 | 18.2% | 13.5% |
| 2045 | 18.6% | 13.7% |
| 2046 | 19% | 13.9% |
| 2047 | 19.4% | 14.2% |
| 2048 | 19.7% | 14.4% |
| 2049 | 20% | 14.7% |
| 2050 | 20.3% | 15% |
The share of older people aged 65 and over is 12.1% in Sri Lanka and 7.9% in Suriname. Life expectancy in Sri Lanka compared to Suriname .
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Demographics by nationality or race
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Race | Share of demographic |
| Sinhalese | 74.9% |
| Sri Lanka Tamil | 11.1% |
| Sri Lanka Moor | 9.3% |
| Indian Tamil | 4.12% |
| Malay | 0.22% |
| Burgher | 0.19% |
| Sri Lanka Chetty | 0.03% |
| Bharatha | 0.008% |
| All other | 0.09% |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Race | Share of demographic |
| Hindustani | 27.4% |
| Creole | 17.7% |
| Maroon | 14.7% |
| Javanese | 14.6% |
| Mixed | 12.5% |
| Indigenous | 3.66% |
| Chinese | 1.78% |
| Caucasian | 0.59% |
| All other | 7.07% |
Religion demographics in Sri Lanka vs Suriname
Median age map
Median age
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Demographics comparisons