Sri Lanka has a population density of 918 people per square mile compared to 50.1 people in Uruguay. Sri Lanka has 32,224 sq ft of land per person vs 560,081 sq ft in Uruguay. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sri Lanka and Uruguay are ranked 25th and 171st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sri Lanka has 0.27% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.12% of the land area for Uruguay, hence the population density in Sri Lanka is 1,731% higher than in Uruguay.
Population density comparison
Sri Lanka
|
Uruguay
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 918 ppl/mi² | 50.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 25/197 | 171/197 |
| Population |
22125995
|
3384690
|
| Land area | 23,884 sq mi | 67,576 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,382 sq ft | 556,282 sq ft |
| Rural population | 80.6% | 4.15% |
| Urban population | 19.4% | 95.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 38.5% |
Sri Lanka vs Uruguay:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sri Lanka increased by 10.6%, compared to a 3.15% growth in Uruguay.
In 2004, Sri Lanka ranked 24th for population density and is in 25th place now. Uruguay was 156th in 2004 and ranks 171st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Uruguay
|
|
| 2024 | 918 | 50.1 |
| 2023 | 923 | 50.1 |
| 2022 | 929 | 50.2 |
| 2021 | 928 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 918 | 50.3 |
| 2019 | 913 | 50.3 |
| 2018 | 907 | 50.2 |
| 2017 | 898 | 50.1 |
| 2016 | 888 | 50 |
| 2015 | 878 | 49.8 |
| 2014 | 858 | 49.7 |
| 2013 | 850 | 49.5 |
| 2012 | 874 | 49.4 |
| 2011 | 868 | 49.2 |
| 2010 | 862 | 49.1 |
| 2009 | 857 | 49 |
| 2008 | 852 | 48.9 |
| 2007 | 846 | 48.8 |
| 2006 | 841 | 48.7 |
| 2005 | 835 | 48.6 |
| 2004 | 830 | 48.6 |
| 2003 | 824 | 48.6 |
| 2002 | 818 | 48.5 |
| 2001 | 810 | 48.5 |
| 2000 | 797 | 48.3 |
| 1999 | 782 | 48.2 |
| 1998 | 768 | 47.9 |
| 1997 | 754 | 47.7 |
| 1996 | 739 | 47.4 |
| 1995 | 725 | 47.2 |
| 1994 | 714 | 47 |
| 1993 | 703 | 46.7 |
| 1992 | 691 | 46.5 |
| 1991 | 680 | 46.2 |
| 1990 | 675 | 45.9 |
| 1989 | 671 | 45.7 |
| 1988 | 664 | 45.4 |
| 1987 | 657 | 45.1 |
| 1986 | 650 | 44.9 |
| 1985 | 642 | 44.6 |
| 1984 | 638 | 44.4 |
| 1983 | 636 | 44.2 |
| 1982 | 631 | 44 |
| 1981 | 624 | 43.9 |
| 1980 | 613 | 43.7 |
| 1979 | 602 | 43.5 |
| 1978 | 591 | 43.3 |
| 1977 | 580 | 43.1 |
| 1976 | 570 | 42.8 |
| 1975 | 560 | 42.5 |
| 1974 | 550 | 42.2 |
| 1973 | 539 | 42 |
| 1972 | 529 | 41.8 |
| 1971 | 518 | 41.5 |
| 1970 | 507 | 41.3 |
| 1969 | 496 | 41 |
| 1968 | 485 | 40.8 |
| 1967 | 473 | 40.4 |
| 1966 | 462 | 40.1 |
| 1965 | 451 | 39.7 |
| 1964 | 440 | 39.3 |
| 1963 | 429 | 38.8 |
| 1962 | 419 | 38.4 |
| 1961 | 409 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sri Lanka
|
Uruguay
|
|
| 2024 | 19.4% | 95.9% |
| 2023 | 19.2% | 95.8% |
| 2022 | 19% | 95.7% |
| 2021 | 18.9% | 95.6% |
| 2020 | 18.7% | 95.5% |
| 2019 | 18.6% | 95.4% |
| 2018 | 18.5% | 95.3% |
| 2017 | 18.4% | 95.2% |
| 2016 | 18.3% | 95.1% |
| 2015 | 18.3% | 95% |
| 2014 | 18.2% | 94.9% |
| 2013 | 18.2% | 94.8% |
| 2012 | 18.2% | 94.7% |
| 2011 | 18.2% | 94.6% |
| 2010 | 18.2% | 94.4% |
| 2009 | 18.2% | 94.2% |
| 2008 | 18.3% | 94% |
| 2007 | 18.3% | 93.8% |
| 2006 | 18.3% | 93.6% |
| 2005 | 18.3% | 93.3% |
| 2004 | 18.3% | 93.1% |
| 2003 | 18.3% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 18.3% | 92.6% |
| 2001 | 18.4% | 92.3% |
| 2000 | 18.4% | 92% |
| 1999 | 18.4% | 91.7% |
| 1998 | 18.4% | 91.5% |
| 1997 | 18.4% | 91.1% |
| 1996 | 18.4% | 90.8% |
| 1995 | 18.5% | 90.5% |
| 1994 | 18.5% | 90.2% |
| 1993 | 18.5% | 89.9% |
| 1992 | 18.5% | 89.6% |
| 1991 | 18.5% | 89.3% |
| 1990 | 18.5% | 89% |
| 1989 | 18.6% | 88.6% |
| 1988 | 18.6% | 88.3% |
| 1987 | 18.6% | 87.9% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 87.6% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 87.2% |
| 1984 | 18.6% | 86.9% |
| 1983 | 18.6% | 86.5% |
| 1982 | 18.7% | 86.1% |
| 1981 | 18.7% | 85.8% |
| 1980 | 18.6% | 85.4% |
| 1979 | 18.5% | 85% |
| 1978 | 18.4% | 84.6% |
| 1977 | 18.3% | 84.2% |
| 1976 | 18.2% | 83.8% |
| 1975 | 18.1% | 83.4% |
| 1974 | 18% | 83.2% |
| 1973 | 17.9% | 83% |
| 1972 | 17.8% | 82.8% |
| 1971 | 17.7% | 82.6% |
| 1970 | 17.6% | 82.4% |
| 1969 | 17.5% | 82.2% |
| 1968 | 17.4% | 82% |
| 1967 | 17.3% | 81.7% |
| 1966 | 17.2% | 81.5% |
| 1965 | 17.1% | 81.3% |
| 1964 | 17% | 81.1% |
| 1963 | 16.9% | 80.9% |
| 1962 | 16.8% | 80.7% |
| 1961 | 16.6% | 80.5% |
| 1960 | 16.4% | 80.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka and from 93.1% to 95.9% in Uruguay.
Densely populated cities
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
|
Uruguay
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Montevideo | 1.3M |
| Salto | 125K |
| Ciudad de la Costa | 112K |
| Rivera | 103K |
| Maldonado | 86.8K |
| Paysandu | 76.4K |
| Tacuarembo | 54.8K |
| Melo | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
