Monaco has a population density of 47,292 people per square mile compared to 10.4 people in Suriname. Monaco has 580 sq ft of land per person vs 2,770,078 sq ft in Suriname. Monaco and Suriname rank 1st and 192nd by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Monaco has 0.0005% of the world's population and 0.000001% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.11% of the land area for Suriname, making the population density in Monaco 454,069% higher than in Suriname.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Monaco
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2026 | 47,292 | 10.4 |
| 2025 | 47,649 | 10.3 |
| 2024 | 48,010 | 10.2 |
| 2023 | 48,414 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 48,383 | 10.1 |
| 2021 | 47,881 | 9.97 |
| 2020 | 48,618 | 9.88 |
| 2019 | 48,694 | 9.77 |
| 2018 | 48,751 | 9.67 |
| 2017 | 48,143 | 9.58 |
| 2016 | 47,629 | 9.48 |
| 2015 | 46,966 | 9.39 |
| 2014 | 46,162 | 9.28 |
| 2013 | 45,292 | 9.18 |
| 2012 | 44,352 | 9.08 |
| 2011 | 43,374 | 8.98 |
| 2010 | 42,374 | 8.87 |
| 2009 | 41,353 | 8.77 |
| 2008 | 40,678 | 8.67 |
| 2007 | 40,680 | 8.57 |
| 2006 | 40,961 | 8.47 |
| 2005 | 41,156 | 8.38 |
| 2004 | 41,280 | 8.29 |
| 2003 | 41,366 | 8.17 |
| 2002 | 41,427 | 8.01 |
| 2001 | 41,459 | 7.85 |
| 2000 | 41,469 | 7.69 |
| 1999 | 41,412 | 7.53 |
| 1998 | 41,229 | 7.38 |
| 1997 | 40,968 | 7.23 |
| 1996 | 40,680 | 7.08 |
| 1995 | 40,388 | 6.93 |
| 1994 | 40,089 | 6.82 |
| 1993 | 39,784 | 6.77 |
| 1992 | 39,466 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 39,131 | 6.7 |
| 1990 | 38,790 | 6.66 |
| 1989 | 38,440 | 6.59 |
| 1988 | 38,053 | 6.49 |
| 1987 | 37,624 | 6.4 |
| 1986 | 37,173 | 6.33 |
| 1985 | 36,711 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 36,232 | 6.17 |
| 1983 | 35,726 | 6.11 |
| 1982 | 35,216 | 6.08 |
| 1981 | 34,873 | 6.06 |
| 1980 | 34,655 | 6.06 |
| 1979 | 34,361 | 6.09 |
| 1978 | 33,994 | 6.16 |
| 1977 | 33,570 | 6.21 |
| 1976 | 33,087 | 6.27 |
| 1975 | 32,582 | 6.31 |
| 1974 | 32,244 | 6.35 |
| 1973 | 32,036 | 6.39 |
| 1972 | 31,767 | 6.41 |
| 1971 | 31,402 | 6.32 |
| 1970 | 30,958 | 6.12 |
| 1969 | 30,450 | 5.92 |
| 1968 | 29,946 | 5.72 |
| 1967 | 29,682 | 5.53 |
| 1966 | 29,556 | 5.34 |
| 1965 | 29,313 | 5.16 |
| 1964 | 28,987 | 4.99 |
| 1963 | 28,602 | 4.79 |
| 1962 | 28,210 | 4.58 |
| 1961 | 27,984 | 4.4 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/monaco/suriname | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Monaco increased by 15.5%, compared to a 22.9% growth in Suriname.
In 2006, Monaco ranked 1st by population density and is 1st still. Suriname was 189th in 2006 and ranks 192nd out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Monaco
|
Suriname
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 47,292 ppl/mi² | 10.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 1/197 | 192/197 |
| Population |
38053
|
646767
|
| Land area | 0.8 sq mi | 61,972 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 581 sq ft | 2,723,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 0% | 34.2% |
| Urban population | 100% | 65.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Monaco
|
Suriname
|
|
| 2024 | 100% | 65.8% |
| 2023 | 100% | 65.8% |
| 2022 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 2021 | 100% | 66% |
| 2020 | 100% | 66% |
| 2019 | 100% | 66% |
| 2018 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 2017 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 2016 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 2015 | 100% | 66.2% |
| 2014 | 100% | 66.2% |
| 2013 | 100% | 66.3% |
| 2012 | 100% | 66.3% |
| 2011 | 100% | 66.4% |
| 2010 | 100% | 66.4% |
| 2009 | 100% | 66.5% |
| 2008 | 100% | 66.6% |
| 2007 | 100% | 66.6% |
| 2006 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 2005 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 2004 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 2003 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 2001 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 2000 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 1999 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 1998 | 100% | 66.7% |
| 1997 | 100% | 66.6% |
| 1996 | 100% | 66.6% |
| 1995 | 100% | 66.6% |
| 1994 | 100% | 66.5% |
| 1993 | 100% | 66.5% |
| 1992 | 100% | 66.5% |
| 1991 | 100% | 66.4% |
| 1990 | 100% | 66.4% |
| 1989 | 100% | 66.3% |
| 1988 | 100% | 66.3% |
| 1987 | 100% | 66.3% |
| 1986 | 100% | 66.2% |
| 1985 | 100% | 66.2% |
| 1984 | 100% | 66.2% |
| 1983 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 1982 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 1981 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 1980 | 100% | 66.1% |
| 1979 | 100% | 66% |
| 1978 | 100% | 66% |
| 1977 | 100% | 66% |
| 1976 | 100% | 66% |
| 1975 | 100% | 66% |
| 1974 | 100% | 66% |
| 1973 | 100% | 66% |
| 1972 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1971 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1970 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1969 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1968 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1967 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1966 | 100% | 65.9% |
| 1965 | 100% | 65.8% |
| 1964 | 100% | 65.8% |
| 1963 | 100% | 65.6% |
| 1962 | 100% | 64.6% |
| 1961 | 100% | 63% |
| 1960 | 100% | 61% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/monaco/suriname | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 100% to 100% in Monaco and from 66.7% to 65.8% in Suriname.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/monaco/suriname | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.