Sri Lanka has a population density of 918 people per square mile compared to 41.3 people in Turkmenistan. Sri Lanka has 32,224 sq ft of land per person vs 705,496 sq ft in Turkmenistan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sri Lanka and Turkmenistan are ranked 25th and 181st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sri Lanka has 0.27% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.09% of the population and 0.32% of the land area for Turkmenistan, hence the population density in Sri Lanka is 2,121% higher than in Turkmenistan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 918 ppl/mi² | 41.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 25/197 | 181/197 |
| Population |
22125995
|
7713465
|
| Land area | 23,884 sq mi | 181,441 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,382 sq ft | 674,933 sq ft |
| Rural population | 80.6% | 45.5% |
| Urban population | 19.4% | 54.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 13.7% |
Sri Lanka vs Turkmenistan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sri Lanka increased by 10.6%, compared to a 51.2% growth in Turkmenistan.
In 2004, Sri Lanka ranked 24th for population density and is in 25th place now. Turkmenistan was 172nd in 2004 and ranks 181st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 918 | 41.3 |
| 2023 | 923 | 40.6 |
| 2022 | 929 | 39.8 |
| 2021 | 928 | 39.1 |
| 2020 | 918 | 38.3 |
| 2019 | 913 | 37.5 |
| 2018 | 907 | 36.7 |
| 2017 | 898 | 35.9 |
| 2016 | 888 | 35.1 |
| 2015 | 878 | 34.3 |
| 2014 | 858 | 33.5 |
| 2013 | 850 | 32.7 |
| 2012 | 874 | 32 |
| 2011 | 868 | 31.3 |
| 2010 | 862 | 30.7 |
| 2009 | 857 | 30 |
| 2008 | 852 | 29.5 |
| 2007 | 846 | 28.9 |
| 2006 | 841 | 28.4 |
| 2005 | 835 | 27.8 |
| 2004 | 830 | 27.3 |
| 2003 | 824 | 26.8 |
| 2002 | 818 | 26.3 |
| 2001 | 810 | 25.8 |
| 2000 | 797 | 25.3 |
| 1999 | 782 | 24.8 |
| 1998 | 768 | 24.3 |
| 1997 | 754 | 23.9 |
| 1996 | 739 | 23.5 |
| 1995 | 725 | 23.1 |
| 1994 | 714 | 22.7 |
| 1993 | 703 | 22.2 |
| 1992 | 691 | 21.7 |
| 1991 | 680 | - |
| 1990 | 675 | - |
| 1989 | 671 | - |
| 1988 | 664 | - |
| 1987 | 657 | - |
| 1986 | 650 | - |
| 1985 | 642 | - |
| 1984 | 638 | - |
| 1983 | 636 | - |
| 1982 | 631 | - |
| 1981 | 624 | - |
| 1980 | 613 | - |
| 1979 | 602 | - |
| 1978 | 591 | - |
| 1977 | 580 | - |
| 1976 | 570 | - |
| 1975 | 560 | - |
| 1974 | 550 | - |
| 1973 | 539 | - |
| 1972 | 529 | - |
| 1971 | 518 | - |
| 1970 | 507 | - |
| 1969 | 496 | - |
| 1968 | 485 | - |
| 1967 | 473 | - |
| 1966 | 462 | - |
| 1965 | 451 | - |
| 1964 | 440 | - |
| 1963 | 429 | - |
| 1962 | 419 | - |
| 1961 | 409 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 19.4% | 54.5% |
| 2023 | 19.2% | 54% |
| 2022 | 19% | 53.5% |
| 2021 | 18.9% | 53% |
| 2020 | 18.7% | 52.5% |
| 2019 | 18.6% | 52% |
| 2018 | 18.5% | 51.6% |
| 2017 | 18.4% | 51.2% |
| 2016 | 18.3% | 50.7% |
| 2015 | 18.3% | 50.3% |
| 2014 | 18.2% | 49.9% |
| 2013 | 18.2% | 49.5% |
| 2012 | 18.2% | 49.2% |
| 2011 | 18.2% | 48.8% |
| 2010 | 18.2% | 48.5% |
| 2009 | 18.2% | 48.2% |
| 2008 | 18.3% | 47.9% |
| 2007 | 18.3% | 47.6% |
| 2006 | 18.3% | 47.3% |
| 2005 | 18.3% | 47.1% |
| 2004 | 18.3% | 46.8% |
| 2003 | 18.3% | 46.6% |
| 2002 | 18.3% | 46.4% |
| 2001 | 18.4% | 46.1% |
| 2000 | 18.4% | 45.9% |
| 1999 | 18.4% | 45.7% |
| 1998 | 18.4% | 45.5% |
| 1997 | 18.4% | 45.2% |
| 1996 | 18.4% | 45% |
| 1995 | 18.5% | 44.8% |
| 1994 | 18.5% | 44.7% |
| 1993 | 18.5% | 44.8% |
| 1992 | 18.5% | 44.9% |
| 1991 | 18.5% | 45% |
| 1990 | 18.5% | 45.1% |
| 1989 | 18.6% | 45.2% |
| 1988 | 18.6% | 45.3% |
| 1987 | 18.6% | 45.5% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 45.8% |
| 1985 | 18.6% | 46% |
| 1984 | 18.6% | 46.2% |
| 1983 | 18.6% | 46.4% |
| 1982 | 18.7% | 46.6% |
| 1981 | 18.7% | 46.9% |
| 1980 | 18.6% | 47.1% |
| 1979 | 18.5% | 47.3% |
| 1978 | 18.4% | 47.4% |
| 1977 | 18.3% | 47.5% |
| 1976 | 18.2% | 47.5% |
| 1975 | 18.1% | 47.6% |
| 1974 | 18% | 47.6% |
| 1973 | 17.9% | 47.6% |
| 1972 | 17.8% | 47.7% |
| 1971 | 17.7% | 47.7% |
| 1970 | 17.6% | 47.8% |
| 1969 | 17.5% | 47.7% |
| 1968 | 17.4% | 47.6% |
| 1967 | 17.3% | 47.4% |
| 1966 | 17.2% | 47.3% |
| 1965 | 17.1% | 47.1% |
| 1964 | 17% | 47% |
| 1963 | 16.9% | 46.8% |
| 1962 | 16.8% | 46.7% |
| 1961 | 16.6% | 46.6% |
| 1960 | 16.4% | 46.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka and from 46.8% to 54.5% in Turkmenistan.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Ashgabat | 1.03M |
| Turkmenabat | 231K |
| Dasoguz | 227K |
| Mary | 126K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons