Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 918 people in Sri Lanka. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 32,224 sq ft in Sri Lanka. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and Sri Lanka are ranked 183rd and 25th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.27% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Sri Lanka, hence the population density in Bolivia is 96.8% lower than in Sri Lanka.
Population density comparison
Bolivia
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 918 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 25/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
22125995
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 23,884 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 30,382 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 80.6% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 19.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 0% |
Bolivia vs Sri Lanka:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 10.6% growth in Sri Lanka.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. Sri Lanka was 24th in 2004 and ranks 25th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Bolivia
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 918 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 923 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 929 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 928 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 918 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 913 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 907 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 898 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 888 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 878 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 858 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 850 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 874 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 868 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 862 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 857 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 852 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 846 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 841 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 835 |
| 2004 | 22 | 830 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 824 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 818 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 810 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 797 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 782 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 768 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 754 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 739 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 725 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 714 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 703 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | 691 |
| 1991 | 17.4 | 680 |
| 1990 | 17 | 675 |
| 1989 | 16.7 | 671 |
| 1988 | 16.3 | 664 |
| 1987 | 16 | 657 |
| 1986 | 15.7 | 650 |
| 1985 | 15.3 | 642 |
| 1984 | 15 | 638 |
| 1983 | 14.7 | 636 |
| 1982 | 14.4 | 631 |
| 1981 | 14.1 | 624 |
| 1980 | 13.8 | 613 |
| 1979 | 13.5 | 602 |
| 1978 | 13.2 | 591 |
| 1977 | 12.9 | 580 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 570 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 560 |
| 1974 | 12 | 550 |
| 1973 | 11.7 | 539 |
| 1972 | 11.5 | 529 |
| 1971 | 11.2 | 518 |
| 1970 | 11 | 507 |
| 1969 | 10.7 | 496 |
| 1968 | 10.5 | 485 |
| 1967 | 10.3 | 473 |
| 1966 | 10 | 462 |
| 1965 | 9.83 | 451 |
| 1964 | 9.62 | 440 |
| 1963 | 9.42 | 429 |
| 1962 | 9.22 | 419 |
| 1961 | 9.03 | 409 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Bolivia
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 19.4% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 19.2% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 19% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 18.9% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 18.7% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 18.6% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 18.5% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 18.4% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 18.3% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 18.3% |
| 2014 | 68% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 18.2% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 18.2% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 18.2% |
| 2009 | 66% | 18.2% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 18.3% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 18.3% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 18.3% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 18.3% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 18.3% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 18.3% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 18.3% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 18.4% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 18.4% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 18.4% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 18.4% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 18.4% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 18.4% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 18.5% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 18.5% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 18.5% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 18.5% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 18.5% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 18.5% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 18.6% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 18.6% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 18.6% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 18.6% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 18.6% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 18.7% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 18.7% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 18.6% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 18.5% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 18.4% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 18.3% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 18.2% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 18.1% |
| 1974 | 41% | 18% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 17.9% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 17.8% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 17.7% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 17.6% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 17.5% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 17.4% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 17.3% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 17.2% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 17.1% |
| 1964 | 38% | 17% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 16.9% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 16.8% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 16.6% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 16.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka.
Densely populated cities
|
Bolivia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 3.15M |
| El Alto | 842K |
| La Paz | 756K |
| Cochabamba | 632K |
| Sucre | 361K |
| Oruro | 265K |
| Potosi | 190K |
| Tarija | 180K |
| Sacaba | 172K |
| Trinidad | 124K |
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
