Slovenia has a population density of 273.5 people per square mile compared to 918 people in Sri Lanka. Slovenia has 102,616 sq ft of land per person vs 32,224 sq ft in Sri Lanka. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Slovenia and Sri Lanka are ranked 89th and 25th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Slovenia has 0.03% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.27% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Sri Lanka, hence the population density in Slovenia is 70.2% lower than in Sri Lanka.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 273.5 ppl/mi² | 918 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 89/197 | 25/197 |
| Population |
2124696
|
22125995
|
| Land area | 7,774 sq mi | 23,884 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,925 sq ft | 30,382 sq ft |
| Rural population | 43.6% | 80.6% |
| Urban population | 56.4% | 19.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Slovenia vs Sri Lanka:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Slovenia increased by 6.5%, compared to a 10.6% growth in Sri Lanka.
In 2004, Slovenia ranked 78th for population density and is in 89th place now. Sri Lanka was 24th in 2004 and ranks 25th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 273.5 | 918 |
| 2023 | 272.8 | 923 |
| 2022 | 271.7 | 929 |
| 2021 | 271.1 | 928 |
| 2020 | 270.4 | 918 |
| 2019 | 268.6 | 913 |
| 2018 | 266.7 | 907 |
| 2017 | 265.8 | 898 |
| 2016 | 265.5 | 888 |
| 2015 | 265.3 | 878 |
| 2014 | 265.2 | 858 |
| 2013 | 264.9 | 850 |
| 2012 | 264.5 | 874 |
| 2011 | 263.9 | 868 |
| 2010 | 263.4 | 862 |
| 2009 | 262.2 | 857 |
| 2008 | 259.9 | 852 |
| 2007 | 259.5 | 846 |
| 2006 | 258.1 | 841 |
| 2005 | 257.3 | 835 |
| 2004 | 256.8 | 830 |
| 2003 | 256.6 | 824 |
| 2002 | 256.5 | 818 |
| 2001 | 256.2 | 810 |
| 2000 | 255.8 | 797 |
| 1999 | 255 | 782 |
| 1998 | 254.8 | 768 |
| 1997 | 255.4 | 754 |
| 1996 | 255.7 | 739 |
| 1995 | 255.9 | 725 |
| 1994 | 255.8 | 714 |
| 1993 | 256.1 | 703 |
| 1992 | 256.7 | 691 |
| 1991 | - | 680 |
| 1990 | - | 675 |
| 1989 | - | 671 |
| 1988 | - | 664 |
| 1987 | - | 657 |
| 1986 | - | 650 |
| 1985 | - | 642 |
| 1984 | - | 638 |
| 1983 | - | 636 |
| 1982 | - | 631 |
| 1981 | - | 624 |
| 1980 | - | 613 |
| 1979 | - | 602 |
| 1978 | - | 591 |
| 1977 | - | 580 |
| 1976 | - | 570 |
| 1975 | - | 560 |
| 1974 | - | 550 |
| 1973 | - | 539 |
| 1972 | - | 529 |
| 1971 | - | 518 |
| 1970 | - | 507 |
| 1969 | - | 496 |
| 1968 | - | 485 |
| 1967 | - | 473 |
| 1966 | - | 462 |
| 1965 | - | 451 |
| 1964 | - | 440 |
| 1963 | - | 429 |
| 1962 | - | 419 |
| 1961 | - | 409 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 56.4% | 19.4% |
| 2023 | 56.1% | 19.2% |
| 2022 | 55.8% | 19% |
| 2021 | 55.4% | 18.9% |
| 2020 | 55.1% | 18.7% |
| 2019 | 54.8% | 18.6% |
| 2018 | 54.5% | 18.5% |
| 2017 | 54.3% | 18.4% |
| 2016 | 54% | 18.3% |
| 2015 | 53.8% | 18.3% |
| 2014 | 53.6% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 53.3% | 18.2% |
| 2012 | 53.1% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 52.9% | 18.2% |
| 2010 | 52.7% | 18.2% |
| 2009 | 52.4% | 18.2% |
| 2008 | 52.2% | 18.3% |
| 2007 | 52% | 18.3% |
| 2006 | 51.8% | 18.3% |
| 2005 | 51.5% | 18.3% |
| 2004 | 51.3% | 18.3% |
| 2003 | 51.1% | 18.3% |
| 2002 | 50.9% | 18.3% |
| 2001 | 50.8% | 18.4% |
| 2000 | 50.8% | 18.4% |
| 1999 | 50.7% | 18.4% |
| 1998 | 50.7% | 18.4% |
| 1997 | 50.7% | 18.4% |
| 1996 | 50.6% | 18.4% |
| 1995 | 50.6% | 18.5% |
| 1994 | 50.6% | 18.5% |
| 1993 | 50.6% | 18.5% |
| 1992 | 50.5% | 18.5% |
| 1991 | 50.5% | 18.5% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 18.5% |
| 1989 | 50.2% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 50.1% | 18.6% |
| 1987 | 49.9% | 18.6% |
| 1986 | 49.7% | 18.6% |
| 1985 | 49.6% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 49.4% | 18.6% |
| 1983 | 49.3% | 18.6% |
| 1982 | 49.1% | 18.7% |
| 1981 | 48.9% | 18.7% |
| 1980 | 48% | 18.6% |
| 1979 | 46.9% | 18.5% |
| 1978 | 45.8% | 18.4% |
| 1977 | 44.6% | 18.3% |
| 1976 | 43.5% | 18.2% |
| 1975 | 42.4% | 18.1% |
| 1974 | 41.3% | 18% |
| 1973 | 40.2% | 17.9% |
| 1972 | 39.1% | 17.8% |
| 1971 | 38% | 17.7% |
| 1970 | 37% | 17.6% |
| 1969 | 36.1% | 17.5% |
| 1968 | 35.2% | 17.4% |
| 1967 | 34.3% | 17.3% |
| 1966 | 33.4% | 17.2% |
| 1965 | 32.5% | 17.1% |
| 1964 | 31.6% | 17% |
| 1963 | 30.8% | 16.9% |
| 1962 | 29.9% | 16.8% |
| 1961 | 29.1% | 16.6% |
| 1960 | 28.2% | 16.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 51.3% to 56.4% in Slovenia and from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons