Suriname has a population density of 10.2 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. Suriname has 2,770,078 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Suriname and Zambia are ranked 193rd and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Suriname has 0.008% of the world's population and 0.11% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in Suriname is 86.2% lower than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
Suriname
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.2 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 193/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
644193
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 61,972 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,723,211 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 33.5% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 66.5% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 11.6% |
Suriname vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Suriname increased by 23.4%, compared to a 88% growth in Zambia.
In 2004, Suriname ranked 186th for population density and is in 193rd place now. Zambia was 163rd in 2004 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Suriname
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 10.2 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 10.1 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 9.97 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 9.88 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 9.77 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 9.67 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 9.58 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 9.48 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 9.39 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 9.28 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 9.18 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 9.08 | 52 |
| 2011 | 8.98 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 8.87 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 8.77 | 47 |
| 2008 | 8.67 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 8.57 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 8.47 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | 8.38 | 40.8 |
| 2004 | 8.29 | 39.5 |
| 2003 | 8.17 | 38.3 |
| 2002 | 8.01 | 37.1 |
| 2001 | 7.85 | 36 |
| 2000 | 7.69 | 34.9 |
| 1999 | 7.53 | 33.9 |
| 1998 | 7.38 | 33 |
| 1997 | 7.23 | 32.2 |
| 1996 | 7.08 | 31.4 |
| 1995 | 6.93 | 30.6 |
| 1994 | 6.82 | 29.9 |
| 1993 | 6.77 | 29.2 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 28.5 |
| 1991 | 6.7 | 27.8 |
| 1990 | 6.66 | 27.1 |
| 1989 | 6.59 | 26.4 |
| 1988 | 6.49 | 25.8 |
| 1987 | 6.4 | 25.1 |
| 1986 | 6.33 | 24.3 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 23.6 |
| 1984 | 6.17 | 22.9 |
| 1983 | 6.11 | 22.2 |
| 1982 | 6.08 | 21.5 |
| 1981 | 6.06 | 20.8 |
| 1980 | 6.06 | 20.2 |
| 1979 | 6.09 | 19.6 |
| 1978 | 6.16 | 19 |
| 1977 | 6.21 | 18.5 |
| 1976 | 6.27 | 17.9 |
| 1975 | 6.31 | 17.4 |
| 1974 | 6.35 | 16.9 |
| 1973 | 6.39 | 16.4 |
| 1972 | 6.41 | 15.9 |
| 1971 | 6.32 | 15.5 |
| 1970 | 6.12 | 15.1 |
| 1969 | 5.92 | 14.6 |
| 1968 | 5.72 | 14.2 |
| 1967 | 5.53 | 13.7 |
| 1966 | 5.34 | 13.3 |
| 1965 | 5.16 | 12.9 |
| 1964 | 4.99 | 12.5 |
| 1963 | 4.79 | 12.1 |
| 1962 | 4.58 | 11.7 |
| 1961 | 4.4 | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Suriname
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 66.5% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 66.4% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 66.3% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 66.2% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 66.1% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 66.1% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 66.1% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 66% | 43% |
| 2016 | 66% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 66.1% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 66.1% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 66.1% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 66.2% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 66.3% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 66.3% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 66.4% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 66.5% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 66.5% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 66.6% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 66.7% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 66.7% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 66.7% | 36% |
| 2002 | 66.6% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 66.5% | 35% |
| 2000 | 66.4% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 66.4% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 66.3% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 66.2% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 66.1% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 66.1% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 66% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 65.9% | 38% |
| 1992 | 65.9% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 65.8% | 39% |
| 1990 | 65.7% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 65.6% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 65.6% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 65.5% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 65.4% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 65.3% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 65.3% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 65.2% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 65.1% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 65% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 65% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 62.8% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 60.6% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 58.3% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 56.1% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 53.7% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 51.4% | 34% |
| 1973 | 49.1% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 46.8% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 45.7% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 45.9% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 46.2% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 46.4% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 46.6% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 46.9% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 47.1% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 47.3% | 22% |
| 1963 | 47.4% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 47.3% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 47.3% | 19% |
| 1960 | 47.3% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lusaka | 2.47M |
| Kitwe | 625K |
| Ndola | 528K |
| Chingola | 255K |
| Mufulira | 182K |
| Livingstone | 177K |
| Kasama | 158K |
| Kapiri Mposhi | 65.2K |
| Choma | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
