Burundi has a population density of 1,417 people per square mile compared to 918 people in Sri Lanka. Burundi has 21,327 sq ft of land per person vs 32,224 sq ft in Sri Lanka. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Burundi and Sri Lanka are ranked 16th and 25th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Burundi has 0.17% of the world's population and 0.02% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.27% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Sri Lanka, hence the population density in Burundi is 54.4% higher than in Sri Lanka.
Population density comparison
Burundi
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1,417 ppl/mi² | 918 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 16/197 | 25/197 |
| Population |
14662443
|
22125995
|
| Land area | 9,915 sq mi | 23,884 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 19,677 sq ft | 30,382 sq ft |
| Rural population | 84.8% | 80.6% |
| Urban population | 15.2% | 19.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Burundi vs Sri Lanka:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Burundi increased by 92.2%, compared to a 10.6% growth in Sri Lanka.
In 2004, Burundi ranked 31st for population density and is in 16th place now. Sri Lanka was 24th in 2004 and ranks 25th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Burundi
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 1,417 | 918 |
| 2023 | 1,381 | 923 |
| 2022 | 1,344 | 929 |
| 2021 | 1,308 | 928 |
| 2020 | 1,273 | 918 |
| 2019 | 1,236 | 913 |
| 2018 | 1,196 | 907 |
| 2017 | 1,161 | 898 |
| 2016 | 1,134 | 888 |
| 2015 | 1,114 | 878 |
| 2014 | 1,089 | 858 |
| 2013 | 1,053 | 850 |
| 2012 | 1,016 | 874 |
| 2011 | 980 | 868 |
| 2010 | 946 | 862 |
| 2009 | 902 | 857 |
| 2008 | 858 | 852 |
| 2007 | 823 | 846 |
| 2006 | 793 | 841 |
| 2005 | 765 | 835 |
| 2004 | 737 | 830 |
| 2003 | 710 | 824 |
| 2002 | 688 | 818 |
| 2001 | 669 | 810 |
| 2000 | 653 | 797 |
| 1999 | 639 | 782 |
| 1998 | 624 | 768 |
| 1997 | 612 | 754 |
| 1996 | 612 | 739 |
| 1995 | 612 | 725 |
| 1994 | 576 | 714 |
| 1993 | 573 | 703 |
| 1992 | 591 | 691 |
| 1991 | 575 | 680 |
| 1990 | 563 | 675 |
| 1989 | 552 | 671 |
| 1988 | 541 | 664 |
| 1987 | 529 | 657 |
| 1986 | 517 | 650 |
| 1985 | 508 | 642 |
| 1984 | 497 | 638 |
| 1983 | 485 | 636 |
| 1982 | 472 | 631 |
| 1981 | 461 | 624 |
| 1980 | 442 | 613 |
| 1979 | 424 | 602 |
| 1978 | 414 | 591 |
| 1977 | 402 | 580 |
| 1976 | 392 | 570 |
| 1975 | 383 | 560 |
| 1974 | 374 | 550 |
| 1973 | 364 | 539 |
| 1972 | 365 | 529 |
| 1971 | 365 | 518 |
| 1970 | 356 | 507 |
| 1969 | 348 | 496 |
| 1968 | 341 | 485 |
| 1967 | 333 | 473 |
| 1966 | 325 | 462 |
| 1965 | 317 | 451 |
| 1964 | 308 | 440 |
| 1963 | 299.5 | 429 |
| 1962 | 293.3 | 419 |
| 1961 | 285.9 | 409 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Burundi
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
| 2024 | 15.2% | 19.4% |
| 2023 | 14.8% | 19.2% |
| 2022 | 14.4% | 19% |
| 2021 | 14.1% | 18.9% |
| 2020 | 13.7% | 18.7% |
| 2019 | 13.4% | 18.6% |
| 2018 | 13% | 18.5% |
| 2017 | 12.7% | 18.4% |
| 2016 | 12.4% | 18.3% |
| 2015 | 12.1% | 18.3% |
| 2014 | 11.8% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 11.5% | 18.2% |
| 2012 | 11.2% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 10.9% | 18.2% |
| 2010 | 10.6% | 18.2% |
| 2009 | 10.4% | 18.2% |
| 2008 | 10.1% | 18.3% |
| 2007 | 9.86% | 18.3% |
| 2006 | 9.62% | 18.3% |
| 2005 | 9.37% | 18.3% |
| 2004 | 9.14% | 18.3% |
| 2003 | 8.91% | 18.3% |
| 2002 | 8.68% | 18.3% |
| 2001 | 8.46% | 18.4% |
| 2000 | 8.25% | 18.4% |
| 1999 | 8.04% | 18.4% |
| 1998 | 7.83% | 18.4% |
| 1997 | 7.62% | 18.4% |
| 1996 | 7.41% | 18.4% |
| 1995 | 7.21% | 18.5% |
| 1994 | 7.01% | 18.5% |
| 1993 | 6.82% | 18.5% |
| 1992 | 6.64% | 18.5% |
| 1991 | 6.46% | 18.5% |
| 1990 | 6.27% | 18.5% |
| 1989 | 6.05% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 5.83% | 18.6% |
| 1987 | 5.62% | 18.6% |
| 1986 | 5.42% | 18.6% |
| 1985 | 5.22% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 5.03% | 18.6% |
| 1983 | 4.85% | 18.6% |
| 1982 | 4.67% | 18.7% |
| 1981 | 4.5% | 18.7% |
| 1980 | 4.34% | 18.6% |
| 1979 | 4.18% | 18.5% |
| 1978 | 4.01% | 18.4% |
| 1977 | 3.84% | 18.3% |
| 1976 | 3.68% | 18.2% |
| 1975 | 3.53% | 18.1% |
| 1974 | 3.38% | 18% |
| 1973 | 3.24% | 17.9% |
| 1972 | 3.1% | 17.8% |
| 1971 | 2.97% | 17.7% |
| 1970 | 2.85% | 17.6% |
| 1969 | 2.73% | 17.5% |
| 1968 | 2.61% | 17.4% |
| 1967 | 2.5% | 17.3% |
| 1966 | 2.39% | 17.2% |
| 1965 | 2.29% | 17.1% |
| 1964 | 2.23% | 17% |
| 1963 | 2.19% | 16.9% |
| 1962 | 2.15% | 16.8% |
| 1961 | 2.12% | 16.6% |
| 1960 | 2.08% | 16.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 9.14% to 15.2% in Burundi and from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka.
Densely populated cities
|
Sri Lanka
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
