Suriname has a population density of 10.2 people per square mile compared to 592 people in Switzerland. Suriname has 2,770,078 sq ft of land per person vs 49,190 sq ft in Switzerland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Suriname and Switzerland are ranked 193rd and 51st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Suriname has 0.008% of the world's population and 0.11% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.11% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for Switzerland, hence the population density in Suriname is 98.3% lower than in Switzerland.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.2 ppl/mi² | 592 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 193/197 | 51/197 |
| Population |
644193
|
9112950
|
| Land area | 61,972 sq mi | 15,255 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,723,211 sq ft | 47,075 sq ft |
| Rural population | 33.5% | 25.7% |
| Urban population | 66.5% | 74.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Suriname vs Switzerland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Suriname increased by 23.4%, compared to a 22.3% growth in Switzerland.
In 2004, Suriname ranked 186th for population density and is in 193rd place now. Switzerland was 44th in 2004 and ranks 51st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 10.2 | 592 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 583 |
| 2022 | 10.1 | 575 |
| 2021 | 9.97 | 571 |
| 2020 | 9.88 | 566 |
| 2019 | 9.77 | 562 |
| 2018 | 9.67 | 558 |
| 2017 | 9.58 | 554 |
| 2016 | 9.48 | 549 |
| 2015 | 9.39 | 543 |
| 2014 | 9.28 | 537 |
| 2013 | 9.18 | 530 |
| 2012 | 9.08 | 524 |
| 2011 | 8.98 | 519 |
| 2010 | 8.87 | 513 |
| 2009 | 8.77 | 508 |
| 2008 | 8.67 | 501 |
| 2007 | 8.57 | 495 |
| 2006 | 8.47 | 491 |
| 2005 | 8.38 | 487 |
| 2004 | 8.29 | 484 |
| 2003 | 8.17 | 481 |
| 2002 | 8.01 | 477 |
| 2001 | 7.85 | 474 |
| 2000 | 7.69 | 471 |
| 1999 | 7.53 | 468 |
| 1998 | 7.38 | 466 |
| 1997 | 7.23 | 464 |
| 1996 | 7.08 | 463 |
| 1995 | 6.93 | 461 |
| 1994 | 6.82 | 458 |
| 1993 | 6.77 | 455 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 450 |
| 1991 | 6.7 | 446 |
| 1990 | 6.66 | 440 |
| 1989 | 6.59 | 436 |
| 1988 | 6.49 | 432 |
| 1987 | 6.4 | 429 |
| 1986 | 6.33 | 426 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 424 |
| 1984 | 6.17 | 422 |
| 1983 | 6.11 | 421 |
| 1982 | 6.08 | 419 |
| 1981 | 6.06 | 416 |
| 1980 | 6.06 | 414 |
| 1979 | 6.09 | 412 |
| 1978 | 6.16 | 412 |
| 1977 | 6.21 | 412 |
| 1976 | 6.27 | 413 |
| 1975 | 6.31 | 415 |
| 1974 | 6.35 | 416 |
| 1973 | 6.39 | 413 |
| 1972 | 6.41 | 410 |
| 1971 | 6.32 | 407 |
| 1970 | 6.12 | 405 |
| 1969 | 5.92 | 402 |
| 1968 | 5.72 | 398 |
| 1967 | 5.53 | 393 |
| 1966 | 5.34 | 388 |
| 1965 | 5.16 | 384 |
| 1964 | 4.99 | 379 |
| 1963 | 4.79 | 373 |
| 1962 | 4.58 | 365 |
| 1961 | 4.4 | 356 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 66.5% | 74.3% |
| 2023 | 66.4% | 74.2% |
| 2022 | 66.3% | 74.1% |
| 2021 | 66.2% | 74% |
| 2020 | 66.1% | 73.9% |
| 2019 | 66.1% | 73.8% |
| 2018 | 66.1% | 73.8% |
| 2017 | 66% | 73.8% |
| 2016 | 66% | 73.7% |
| 2015 | 66.1% | 73.7% |
| 2014 | 66.1% | 73.7% |
| 2013 | 66.1% | 73.7% |
| 2012 | 66.2% | 73.7% |
| 2011 | 66.3% | 73.6% |
| 2010 | 66.3% | 73.6% |
| 2009 | 66.4% | 73.6% |
| 2008 | 66.5% | 73.6% |
| 2007 | 66.5% | 73.5% |
| 2006 | 66.6% | 73.5% |
| 2005 | 66.7% | 73.5% |
| 2004 | 66.7% | 73.5% |
| 2003 | 66.7% | 73.4% |
| 2002 | 66.6% | 73.4% |
| 2001 | 66.5% | 73.4% |
| 2000 | 66.4% | 73.4% |
| 1999 | 66.4% | 73.4% |
| 1998 | 66.3% | 73.5% |
| 1997 | 66.2% | 73.5% |
| 1996 | 66.1% | 73.6% |
| 1995 | 66.1% | 73.7% |
| 1994 | 66% | 73.7% |
| 1993 | 65.9% | 73.8% |
| 1992 | 65.9% | 73.8% |
| 1991 | 65.8% | 73.9% |
| 1990 | 65.7% | 73.9% |
| 1989 | 65.6% | 74% |
| 1988 | 65.6% | 74% |
| 1987 | 65.5% | 74.1% |
| 1986 | 65.4% | 74.2% |
| 1985 | 65.3% | 74.2% |
| 1984 | 65.3% | 74.3% |
| 1983 | 65.2% | 74.3% |
| 1982 | 65.1% | 74.4% |
| 1981 | 65% | 74.5% |
| 1980 | 65% | 74.5% |
| 1979 | 62.8% | 74.4% |
| 1978 | 60.6% | 74.4% |
| 1977 | 58.3% | 74.3% |
| 1976 | 56.1% | 74.3% |
| 1975 | 53.7% | 74.2% |
| 1974 | 51.4% | 74.2% |
| 1973 | 49.1% | 74.1% |
| 1972 | 46.8% | 74% |
| 1971 | 45.7% | 74% |
| 1970 | 45.9% | 73.8% |
| 1969 | 46.2% | 73.6% |
| 1968 | 46.4% | 73.3% |
| 1967 | 46.6% | 73% |
| 1966 | 46.9% | 72.7% |
| 1965 | 47.1% | 72.4% |
| 1964 | 47.3% | 72.1% |
| 1963 | 47.4% | 71.8% |
| 1962 | 47.3% | 71.5% |
| 1961 | 47.3% | 71.2% |
| 1960 | 47.3% | 70.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66.7% to 66.5% in Suriname and from 73.5% to 74.3% in Switzerland.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Zurich | 449K |
| Geneva | 207K |
| Basel | 176K |
| Bern | 146K |
| Lausanne | 144K |
| Winterthur | 119K |
| Biel/Bienne | 55.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons