Suriname has a population density of 10.4 people per square mile compared to 473 people in Togo. Suriname has 2,770,078 sq ft of land per person vs 64,237 sq ft in Togo. Suriname and Togo rank 192nd and 57th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Suriname has 0.008% of the world's population and 0.11% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.12% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Togo, making the population density in Suriname 97.8% lower than in Togo.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Suriname
|
Togo
|
|
| 2026 | 10.4 | 473 |
| 2025 | 10.3 | 463 |
| 2024 | 10.2 | 453 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 443 |
| 2022 | 10.1 | 433 |
| 2021 | 9.97 | 423 |
| 2020 | 9.88 | 413 |
| 2019 | 9.77 | 403 |
| 2018 | 9.67 | 393 |
| 2017 | 9.58 | 384 |
| 2016 | 9.48 | 374 |
| 2015 | 9.39 | 365 |
| 2014 | 9.28 | 356 |
| 2013 | 9.18 | 347 |
| 2012 | 9.08 | 338 |
| 2011 | 8.98 | 329 |
| 2010 | 8.87 | 321 |
| 2009 | 8.77 | 312 |
| 2008 | 8.67 | 303 |
| 2007 | 8.57 | 294.7 |
| 2006 | 8.47 | 286.2 |
| 2005 | 8.38 | 278.3 |
| 2004 | 8.29 | 271.3 |
| 2003 | 8.17 | 264.4 |
| 2002 | 8.01 | 257.8 |
| 2001 | 7.85 | 251.3 |
| 2000 | 7.69 | 244.8 |
| 1999 | 7.53 | 238.1 |
| 1998 | 7.38 | 231.5 |
| 1997 | 7.23 | 225 |
| 1996 | 7.08 | 218 |
| 1995 | 6.93 | 210 |
| 1994 | 6.82 | 201.1 |
| 1993 | 6.77 | 200.4 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 201.6 |
| 1991 | 6.7 | 196 |
| 1990 | 6.66 | 190.4 |
| 1989 | 6.59 | 184.9 |
| 1988 | 6.49 | 179.5 |
| 1987 | 6.4 | 174.2 |
| 1986 | 6.33 | 168.9 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 163.9 |
| 1984 | 6.17 | 158.7 |
| 1983 | 6.11 | 153.5 |
| 1982 | 6.08 | 148.3 |
| 1981 | 6.06 | 143.5 |
| 1980 | 6.06 | 139.1 |
| 1979 | 6.09 | 135.2 |
| 1978 | 6.16 | 131.8 |
| 1977 | 6.21 | 128.7 |
| 1976 | 6.27 | 125.6 |
| 1975 | 6.31 | 122.6 |
| 1974 | 6.35 | 119.6 |
| 1973 | 6.39 | 116.6 |
| 1972 | 6.41 | 113.6 |
| 1971 | 6.32 | 110.4 |
| 1970 | 6.12 | 106.9 |
| 1969 | 5.92 | 103.1 |
| 1968 | 5.72 | 99.1 |
| 1967 | 5.53 | 95 |
| 1966 | 5.34 | 91.4 |
| 1965 | 5.16 | 88.3 |
| 1964 | 4.99 | 85.9 |
| 1963 | 4.79 | 84.1 |
| 1962 | 4.58 | 82.5 |
| 1961 | 4.4 | 81.1 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/suriname/togo | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Suriname increased by 22.9%, compared to a 65.2% growth in Togo.
In 2006, Suriname ranked 189th by population density and is 192nd now. Togo was 72nd in 2006 and ranks 57th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Suriname
|
Togo
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.4 ppl/mi² | 473 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 192/197 | 57/197 |
| Population |
646767
|
9990340
|
| Land area | 61,972 sq mi | 21,000 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,723,211 sq ft | 61,528 sq ft |
| Rural population | 34.2% | 56.2% |
| Urban population | 65.8% | 43.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 21.9% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Suriname
|
Togo
|
|
| 2024 | 65.8% | 43.8% |
| 2023 | 65.8% | 43.2% |
| 2022 | 65.9% | 42.7% |
| 2021 | 66% | 42.3% |
| 2020 | 66% | 41.9% |
| 2019 | 66% | 41.4% |
| 2018 | 66.1% | 41% |
| 2017 | 66.1% | 40.6% |
| 2016 | 66.1% | 40.1% |
| 2015 | 66.2% | 39.7% |
| 2014 | 66.2% | 39.3% |
| 2013 | 66.3% | 38.9% |
| 2012 | 66.3% | 38.4% |
| 2011 | 66.4% | 38% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 37.6% |
| 2009 | 66.5% | 37.1% |
| 2008 | 66.6% | 36.7% |
| 2007 | 66.6% | 36.2% |
| 2006 | 66.7% | 35.8% |
| 2005 | 66.7% | 35.3% |
| 2004 | 66.7% | 34.9% |
| 2003 | 66.7% | 34.5% |
| 2002 | 66.7% | 34% |
| 2001 | 66.7% | 33.6% |
| 2000 | 66.7% | 33.1% |
| 1999 | 66.7% | 32.6% |
| 1998 | 66.7% | 32.2% |
| 1997 | 66.6% | 31.8% |
| 1996 | 66.6% | 31.3% |
| 1995 | 66.6% | 30.9% |
| 1994 | 66.5% | 30.4% |
| 1993 | 66.5% | 30% |
| 1992 | 66.5% | 29.5% |
| 1991 | 66.4% | 29.1% |
| 1990 | 66.4% | 28.7% |
| 1989 | 66.3% | 28.2% |
| 1988 | 66.3% | 27.8% |
| 1987 | 66.3% | 27.4% |
| 1986 | 66.2% | 27% |
| 1985 | 66.2% | 26.6% |
| 1984 | 66.2% | 26.2% |
| 1983 | 66.1% | 25.8% |
| 1982 | 66.1% | 25.4% |
| 1981 | 66.1% | 25.1% |
| 1980 | 66.1% | 24.7% |
| 1979 | 66% | 24.4% |
| 1978 | 66% | 24.1% |
| 1977 | 66% | 23.8% |
| 1976 | 66% | 23.5% |
| 1975 | 66% | 23.2% |
| 1974 | 66% | 22.9% |
| 1973 | 66% | 22.6% |
| 1972 | 65.9% | 22.2% |
| 1971 | 65.9% | 21.8% |
| 1970 | 65.9% | 21.4% |
| 1969 | 65.9% | 20.8% |
| 1968 | 65.9% | 20% |
| 1967 | 65.9% | 19% |
| 1966 | 65.9% | 17.8% |
| 1965 | 65.8% | 16.5% |
| 1964 | 65.8% | 15.2% |
| 1963 | 65.6% | 13.9% |
| 1962 | 64.6% | 12.7% |
| 1961 | 63% | 11.6% |
| 1960 | 61% | 10.6% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/suriname/togo | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 66.7% to 65.8% in Suriname and from 34.9% to 43.8% in Togo.
Densely populated cities
|
Togo
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lome | 2.19M |
| Kara | 158K |
| Sokode | 115K |
| Atakpame | 98.2K |
| Kpalime | 87.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/suriname/togo | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2022–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.