Suriname has a population density of 10.2 people per square mile compared to 5,886 people in the Vatican. Suriname has 2,770,078 sq ft of land per person vs 5,274 sq ft in the Vatican. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Suriname and the Vatican are ranked 193rd and 3rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Suriname has 0.008% of the world's population and 0.11% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.00001% of the population and 0.0000003% of the land area for the Vatican, hence the population density in Suriname is 99.8% lower than in the Vatican.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.2 ppl/mi² | 5,886 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 193/197 | 3/197 |
| Population |
644193
|
949
|
| Land area | 61,972 sq mi | 0.17 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,723,211 sq ft | 4,736 sq ft |
| Rural population | 33.5% | n/a |
| Urban population | 66.5% | n/a |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Suriname vs the Vatican:
Population density chart by year
From 2000 to 2019, population density in Suriname increased by 27.1%, compared to a 13.6% growth in the Vatican.
In 2000, Suriname ranked 186th for population density and is in 193rd place now. The Vatican was 3rd in 2000 and still ranks 3rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 10.2 | - |
| 2023 | 10.1 | - |
| 2022 | 10.1 | - |
| 2021 | 9.97 | - |
| 2020 | 9.88 | - |
| 2019 | 9.77 | 5,886 |
| 2018 | 9.67 | 5,886 |
| 2017 | 9.58 | 5,886 |
| 2016 | 9.48 | 5,886 |
| 2015 | 9.39 | 5,886 |
| 2014 | 9.28 | 4,956 |
| 2013 | 9.18 | 4,939 |
| 2012 | 9.08 | 4,921 |
| 2011 | 8.98 | 4,897 |
| 2010 | 8.87 | 4,880 |
| 2009 | 8.77 | 4,862 |
| 2008 | 8.67 | 4,850 |
| 2007 | 8.57 | 4,833 |
| 2006 | 8.47 | 5,486 |
| 2005 | 8.38 | 5,421 |
| 2004 | 8.29 | 5,421 |
| 2003 | 8.17 | 5,362 |
| 2002 | 8.01 | 5,298 |
| 2001 | 7.85 | 5,239 |
| 2000 | 7.69 | 5,180 |
| 1999 | 7.53 | - |
| 1998 | 7.38 | - |
| 1997 | 7.23 | - |
| 1996 | 7.08 | - |
| 1995 | 6.93 | - |
| 1994 | 6.82 | - |
| 1993 | 6.77 | - |
| 1992 | 6.74 | - |
| 1991 | 6.7 | - |
| 1990 | 6.66 | - |
| 1989 | 6.59 | - |
| 1988 | 6.49 | - |
| 1987 | 6.4 | - |
| 1986 | 6.33 | - |
| 1985 | 6.24 | - |
| 1984 | 6.17 | - |
| 1983 | 6.11 | - |
| 1982 | 6.08 | - |
| 1981 | 6.06 | - |
| 1980 | 6.06 | - |
| 1979 | 6.09 | - |
| 1978 | 6.16 | - |
| 1977 | 6.21 | - |
| 1976 | 6.27 | - |
| 1975 | 6.31 | - |
| 1974 | 6.35 | - |
| 1973 | 6.39 | - |
| 1972 | 6.41 | - |
| 1971 | 6.32 | - |
| 1970 | 6.12 | - |
| 1969 | 5.92 | - |
| 1968 | 5.72 | - |
| 1967 | 5.53 | - |
| 1966 | 5.34 | - |
| 1965 | 5.16 | - |
| 1964 | 4.99 | - |
| 1963 | 4.79 | - |
| 1962 | 4.58 | - |
| 1961 | 4.4 | - |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons