Nicaragua has a population density of 148.9 people per square mile compared to 918 people in Sri Lanka. Nicaragua has 187,291 sq ft of land per person vs 32,224 sq ft in Sri Lanka. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Nicaragua and Sri Lanka are ranked 132nd and 25th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Nicaragua has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.08% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.27% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Sri Lanka, hence the population density in Nicaragua is 83.8% lower than in Sri Lanka.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 148.9 ppl/mi² | 918 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 132/197 | 25/197 |
| Population |
7079664
|
22125995
|
| Land area | 46,464 sq mi | 23,884 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 187,291 sq ft | 30,382 sq ft |
| Rural population | 39.8% | 80.6% |
| Urban population | 60.2% | 19.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Nicaragua vs Sri Lanka:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Nicaragua increased by 31.2%, compared to a 10.6% growth in Sri Lanka.
In 2004, Nicaragua ranked 126th for population density and is in 132nd place now. Sri Lanka was 24th in 2004 and ranks 25th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 148.9 | 918 |
| 2023 | 146.9 | 923 |
| 2022 | 144.9 | 929 |
| 2021 | 143 | 928 |
| 2020 | 141.3 | 918 |
| 2019 | 139.5 | 913 |
| 2018 | 137.7 | 907 |
| 2017 | 135.9 | 898 |
| 2016 | 134.1 | 888 |
| 2015 | 132.3 | 878 |
| 2014 | 130.6 | 858 |
| 2013 | 128.8 | 850 |
| 2012 | 127 | 874 |
| 2011 | 125.2 | 868 |
| 2010 | 123.5 | 862 |
| 2009 | 121.7 | 857 |
| 2008 | 120 | 852 |
| 2007 | 118.3 | 846 |
| 2006 | 116.6 | 841 |
| 2005 | 115 | 835 |
| 2004 | 113.5 | 830 |
| 2003 | 112.2 | 824 |
| 2002 | 110.8 | 818 |
| 2001 | 109.5 | 810 |
| 2000 | 108.1 | 797 |
| 1999 | 106.6 | 782 |
| 1998 | 105.1 | 768 |
| 1997 | 103.5 | 754 |
| 1996 | 101.8 | 739 |
| 1995 | 99.9 | 725 |
| 1994 | 97.9 | 714 |
| 1993 | 95.9 | 703 |
| 1992 | 93.8 | 691 |
| 1991 | 91.7 | 680 |
| 1990 | 89.6 | 675 |
| 1989 | 87.5 | 671 |
| 1988 | 85.5 | 664 |
| 1987 | 83.6 | 657 |
| 1986 | 81.7 | 650 |
| 1985 | 79.8 | 642 |
| 1984 | 77.9 | 638 |
| 1983 | 76 | 636 |
| 1982 | 74 | 631 |
| 1981 | 72 | 624 |
| 1980 | 70 | 613 |
| 1979 | 68.1 | 602 |
| 1978 | 66.3 | 591 |
| 1977 | 64.4 | 580 |
| 1976 | 62.5 | 570 |
| 1975 | 60.6 | 560 |
| 1974 | 58.8 | 550 |
| 1973 | 57 | 539 |
| 1972 | 55.4 | 529 |
| 1971 | 53.8 | 518 |
| 1970 | 52.1 | 507 |
| 1969 | 50.5 | 496 |
| 1968 | 49 | 485 |
| 1967 | 47.5 | 473 |
| 1966 | 46 | 462 |
| 1965 | 44.6 | 451 |
| 1964 | 43.3 | 440 |
| 1963 | 42 | 429 |
| 1962 | 40.7 | 419 |
| 1961 | 39.5 | 409 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 60.2% | 19.4% |
| 2023 | 59.8% | 19.2% |
| 2022 | 59.6% | 19% |
| 2021 | 59.3% | 18.9% |
| 2020 | 59% | 18.7% |
| 2019 | 58.8% | 18.6% |
| 2018 | 58.5% | 18.5% |
| 2017 | 58.3% | 18.4% |
| 2016 | 58.1% | 18.3% |
| 2015 | 57.9% | 18.3% |
| 2014 | 57.7% | 18.2% |
| 2013 | 57.5% | 18.2% |
| 2012 | 57.3% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 57.1% | 18.2% |
| 2010 | 56.9% | 18.2% |
| 2009 | 56.7% | 18.2% |
| 2008 | 56.5% | 18.3% |
| 2007 | 56.3% | 18.3% |
| 2006 | 56.1% | 18.3% |
| 2005 | 55.9% | 18.3% |
| 2004 | 55.8% | 18.3% |
| 2003 | 55.6% | 18.3% |
| 2002 | 55.5% | 18.3% |
| 2001 | 55.3% | 18.4% |
| 2000 | 55.2% | 18.4% |
| 1999 | 55% | 18.4% |
| 1998 | 54.9% | 18.4% |
| 1997 | 54.7% | 18.4% |
| 1996 | 54.6% | 18.4% |
| 1995 | 54.4% | 18.5% |
| 1994 | 54.2% | 18.5% |
| 1993 | 53.9% | 18.5% |
| 1992 | 53.6% | 18.5% |
| 1991 | 53.4% | 18.5% |
| 1990 | 53.1% | 18.5% |
| 1989 | 52.8% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 52.5% | 18.6% |
| 1987 | 52.2% | 18.6% |
| 1986 | 52% | 18.6% |
| 1985 | 51.7% | 18.6% |
| 1984 | 51.4% | 18.6% |
| 1983 | 51.1% | 18.6% |
| 1982 | 50.8% | 18.7% |
| 1981 | 50.6% | 18.7% |
| 1980 | 50.3% | 18.6% |
| 1979 | 50% | 18.5% |
| 1978 | 49.7% | 18.4% |
| 1977 | 49.5% | 18.3% |
| 1976 | 49.2% | 18.2% |
| 1975 | 48.9% | 18.1% |
| 1974 | 48.6% | 18% |
| 1973 | 48.3% | 17.9% |
| 1972 | 48.1% | 17.8% |
| 1971 | 47.8% | 17.7% |
| 1970 | 47% | 17.6% |
| 1969 | 46.2% | 17.5% |
| 1968 | 45.3% | 17.4% |
| 1967 | 44.4% | 17.3% |
| 1966 | 43.6% | 17.2% |
| 1965 | 42.7% | 17.1% |
| 1964 | 41.9% | 17% |
| 1963 | 41% | 16.9% |
| 1962 | 40.5% | 16.8% |
| 1961 | 40% | 16.6% |
| 1960 | 39.6% | 16.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 55.8% to 60.2% in Nicaragua and from 18.3% to 19.4% in Sri Lanka.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Managua | 937K |
| Leon | 174K |
| Masaya | 140K |
| Matagalpa | 133K |
| Chinandega | 122K |
| Esteli | 112K |
| Granada | 105K |
| Jinotega | 99.4K |
| Juigalpa | 51.8K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Colombo | 753K |
| Gampaha | 191K |
| Beruwala | 165K |
| Negombo | 142K |
| Kandy | 120K |
| Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | 116K |
| Trincomalee | 99.1K |
| Galle | 93.1K |
| Matara | 68.2K |
| Anuradhapura | 63.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons