The Czech Republic has a population density of 365 people per square mile compared to 1,264 people in India. The Czech Republic has 78,009 sq ft of land per person vs 24,387 sq ft in India. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Czech Republic and India are ranked 69th and 19th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 17.8% of the population and 2% of the land area for India, hence the population density in the Czech Republic is 71.1% lower than in India.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 365 ppl/mi² | 1,264 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 69/197 | 19/197 |
| Population |
10753822
|
1474115403
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 1,147,955 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,329 sq ft | 22,057 sq ft |
| Rural population | 25.3% | 63.1% |
| Urban population | 74.7% | 36.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.8% | 10.7% |
the Czech Republic vs India:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 6.85%, compared to a 27.7% growth in India.
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked 59th for population density and is in 69th place now. India was 17th in 2004 and ranks 19th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 365 | 1,264 |
| 2023 | 365 | 1,253 |
| 2022 | 358 | 1,242 |
| 2021 | 353 | 1,232 |
| 2020 | 359 | 1,222 |
| 2019 | 358 | 1,210 |
| 2018 | 357 | 1,197 |
| 2017 | 355 | 1,184 |
| 2016 | 354 | 1,171 |
| 2015 | 354 | 1,157 |
| 2014 | 353 | 1,143 |
| 2013 | 353 | 1,129 |
| 2012 | 352 | 1,114 |
| 2011 | 352 | 1,099 |
| 2010 | 351 | 1,083 |
| 2009 | 350 | 1,068 |
| 2008 | 348 | 1,052 |
| 2007 | 345 | 1,037 |
| 2006 | 343 | 1,022 |
| 2005 | 342 | 1,006 |
| 2004 | 342 | 990 |
| 2003 | 342 | 973 |
| 2002 | 342 | 956 |
| 2001 | 342 | 939 |
| 2000 | 344 | 922 |
| 1999 | 345 | 904 |
| 1998 | 345 | 887 |
| 1997 | 345 | 870 |
| 1996 | 346 | 853 |
| 1995 | 346 | 837 |
| 1994 | 346 | 820 |
| 1993 | 346 | 803 |
| 1992 | - | 787 |
| 1991 | - | 770 |
| 1990 | - | 753 |
| 1989 | - | 737 |
| 1988 | - | 721 |
| 1987 | - | 705 |
| 1986 | - | 689 |
| 1985 | - | 673 |
| 1984 | - | 658 |
| 1983 | - | 642 |
| 1982 | - | 627 |
| 1981 | - | 613 |
| 1980 | - | 599 |
| 1979 | - | 585 |
| 1978 | - | 571 |
| 1977 | - | 558 |
| 1976 | - | 545 |
| 1975 | - | 533 |
| 1974 | - | 520 |
| 1973 | - | 508 |
| 1972 | - | 497 |
| 1971 | - | 486 |
| 1970 | - | 476 |
| 1969 | - | 465 |
| 1968 | - | 455 |
| 1967 | - | 446 |
| 1966 | - | 436 |
| 1965 | - | 427 |
| 1964 | - | 417 |
| 1963 | - | 408 |
| 1962 | - | 398 |
| 1961 | - | 389 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 74.7% | 36.9% |
| 2023 | 74.6% | 36.4% |
| 2022 | 74.4% | 35.9% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 35.4% |
| 2020 | 74.1% | 34.9% |
| 2019 | 73.9% | 34.5% |
| 2018 | 73.8% | 34% |
| 2017 | 73.7% | 33.6% |
| 2016 | 73.6% | 33.2% |
| 2015 | 73.5% | 32.8% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | 32.4% |
| 2013 | 73.3% | 32% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 31.6% |
| 2011 | 73.2% | 31.3% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 30.9% |
| 2009 | 73.3% | 30.6% |
| 2008 | 73.4% | 30.2% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 29.9% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 29.6% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 29.2% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 28.9% |
| 2003 | 73.7% | 28.6% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 28.2% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 27.9% |
| 2000 | 74% | 27.7% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 27.5% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 27.2% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 27% |
| 1996 | 74.5% | 26.8% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 26.6% |
| 1994 | 74.8% | 26.4% |
| 1993 | 74.9% | 26.2% |
| 1992 | 75% | 26% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 25.8% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 25.5% |
| 1989 | 75.2% | 25.3% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 25.1% |
| 1987 | 75.3% | 24.8% |
| 1986 | 75.3% | 24.6% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 24.3% |
| 1984 | 75.4% | 24.1% |
| 1983 | 75.4% | 23.9% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 23.6% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 23.4% |
| 1980 | 75.2% | 23.1% |
| 1979 | 74.2% | 22.7% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 22.4% |
| 1977 | 72.1% | 22% |
| 1976 | 71% | 21.7% |
| 1975 | 69.9% | 21.3% |
| 1974 | 68.8% | 21% |
| 1973 | 67.6% | 20.7% |
| 1972 | 66.5% | 20.3% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 20% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 19.8% |
| 1969 | 63.9% | 19.6% |
| 1968 | 63.5% | 19.4% |
| 1967 | 63% | 19.2% |
| 1966 | 62.5% | 19% |
| 1965 | 62% | 18.8% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 18.6% |
| 1963 | 61% | 18.4% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 18.2% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 18% |
| 1960 | 59.5% | 17.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic and from 28.9% to 36.9% in India.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons