India has a population density of 1,264 people per square mile compared to 202.9 people in Serbia. India has 24,387 sq ft of land per person vs 144,613 sq ft in Serbia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, India and Serbia are ranked 19th and 110th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. India has 17.8% of the world's population and 2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Serbia, hence the population density in India is 523% higher than in Serbia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1,264 ppl/mi² | 202.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 19/197 | 110/197 |
| Population |
1474115403
|
6541064
|
| Land area | 1,147,955 sq mi | 32,467 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 22,057 sq ft | 137,408 sq ft |
| Rural population | 63.1% | 42.6% |
| Urban population | 36.9% | 57.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 10.7% | 18.2% |
India vs Serbia:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in India increased by 23.7%, compared to a 7.56% decline in Serbia.
In 2006, India ranked 17th for population density and is in 19th place now. Serbia was 87th in 2006 and ranks 110th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 1,264 | 202.9 |
| 2023 | 1,253 | 204 |
| 2022 | 1,242 | 205.3 |
| 2021 | 1,232 | 210.5 |
| 2020 | 1,222 | 212.5 |
| 2019 | 1,210 | 205.7 |
| 2018 | 1,197 | 206.8 |
| 2017 | 1,184 | 207.9 |
| 2016 | 1,171 | 209 |
| 2015 | 1,157 | 210.1 |
| 2014 | 1,143 | 211.2 |
| 2013 | 1,129 | 212.2 |
| 2012 | 1,114 | 213.3 |
| 2011 | 1,099 | 214.3 |
| 2010 | 1,083 | 215.9 |
| 2009 | 1,068 | 216.8 |
| 2008 | 1,052 | 217.7 |
| 2007 | 1,037 | 218.6 |
| 2006 | 1,022 | 219.5 |
| 2005 | 1,006 | - |
| 2004 | 990 | - |
| 2003 | 973 | - |
| 2002 | 956 | - |
| 2001 | 939 | - |
| 2000 | 922 | - |
| 1999 | 904 | - |
| 1998 | 887 | - |
| 1997 | 870 | - |
| 1996 | 853 | - |
| 1995 | 837 | - |
| 1994 | 820 | - |
| 1993 | 803 | - |
| 1992 | 787 | - |
| 1991 | 770 | - |
| 1990 | 753 | - |
| 1989 | 737 | - |
| 1988 | 721 | - |
| 1987 | 705 | - |
| 1986 | 689 | - |
| 1985 | 673 | - |
| 1984 | 658 | - |
| 1983 | 642 | - |
| 1982 | 627 | - |
| 1981 | 613 | - |
| 1980 | 599 | - |
| 1979 | 585 | - |
| 1978 | 571 | - |
| 1977 | 558 | - |
| 1976 | 545 | - |
| 1975 | 533 | - |
| 1974 | 520 | - |
| 1973 | 508 | - |
| 1972 | 497 | - |
| 1971 | 486 | - |
| 1970 | 476 | - |
| 1969 | 465 | - |
| 1968 | 455 | - |
| 1967 | 446 | - |
| 1966 | 436 | - |
| 1965 | 427 | - |
| 1964 | 417 | - |
| 1963 | 408 | - |
| 1962 | 398 | - |
| 1961 | 389 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 36.9% | 57.4% |
| 2023 | 36.4% | 57.1% |
| 2022 | 35.9% | 56.9% |
| 2021 | 35.4% | 56.7% |
| 2020 | 34.9% | 56.4% |
| 2019 | 34.5% | 56.3% |
| 2018 | 34% | 56.1% |
| 2017 | 33.6% | 55.9% |
| 2016 | 33.2% | 55.8% |
| 2015 | 32.8% | 55.7% |
| 2014 | 32.4% | 55.6% |
| 2013 | 32% | 55.5% |
| 2012 | 31.6% | 55.4% |
| 2011 | 31.3% | 55.2% |
| 2010 | 30.9% | 55% |
| 2009 | 30.6% | 54.8% |
| 2008 | 30.2% | 54.5% |
| 2007 | 29.9% | 54.3% |
| 2006 | 29.6% | 54.1% |
| 2005 | 29.2% | 53.9% |
| 2004 | 28.9% | 53.7% |
| 2003 | 28.6% | 53.4% |
| 2002 | 28.2% | 53.2% |
| 2001 | 27.9% | 53% |
| 2000 | 27.7% | 52.8% |
| 1999 | 27.5% | 52.5% |
| 1998 | 27.2% | 52.3% |
| 1997 | 27% | 52.1% |
| 1996 | 26.8% | 51.9% |
| 1995 | 26.6% | 51.7% |
| 1994 | 26.4% | 51.4% |
| 1993 | 26.2% | 51.2% |
| 1992 | 26% | 51% |
| 1991 | 25.8% | 50.8% |
| 1990 | 25.5% | 50.4% |
| 1989 | 25.3% | 50% |
| 1988 | 25.1% | 49.6% |
| 1987 | 24.8% | 49.2% |
| 1986 | 24.6% | 48.8% |
| 1985 | 24.3% | 48.3% |
| 1984 | 24.1% | 47.9% |
| 1983 | 23.9% | 47.5% |
| 1982 | 23.6% | 47.1% |
| 1981 | 23.4% | 46.7% |
| 1980 | 23.1% | 46.1% |
| 1979 | 22.7% | 45.5% |
| 1978 | 22.4% | 44.9% |
| 1977 | 22% | 44.3% |
| 1976 | 21.7% | 43.7% |
| 1975 | 21.3% | 43.1% |
| 1974 | 21% | 42.5% |
| 1973 | 20.7% | 41.9% |
| 1972 | 20.3% | 41.3% |
| 1971 | 20% | 40.7% |
| 1970 | 19.8% | 39.7% |
| 1969 | 19.6% | 38.6% |
| 1968 | 19.4% | 37.5% |
| 1967 | 19.2% | 36.4% |
| 1966 | 19% | 35.3% |
| 1965 | 18.8% | 34.2% |
| 1964 | 18.6% | 33.1% |
| 1963 | 18.4% | 32.1% |
| 1962 | 18.2% | 31.1% |
| 1961 | 18% | 30.1% |
| 1960 | 17.9% | 29.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 28.9% to 36.9% in India and from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons