The Congo has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 365 people in the Czech Republic. The Congo has 581,285 sq ft of land per person vs 78,009 sq ft in the Czech Republic. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Congo and the Czech Republic are ranked 174th and 69th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Congo has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.23% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for the Czech Republic, hence the population density in the Congo is 86.8% lower than in the Czech Republic.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 365 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 174/197 | 69/197 |
| Population |
6607609
|
10753822
|
| Land area | 131,854 sq mi | 29,794 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,436 sq ft | 76,329 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30.4% | 25.3% |
| Urban population | 69.6% | 74.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 56.3% | 12.8% |
the Congo vs the Czech Republic:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Congo increased by 77.6%, compared to a 6.85% growth in the Czech Republic.
In 2004, the Congo ranked 174th for population density and is in 174th place still. The Czech Republic was 59th in 2004 and ranks 69th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 365 |
| 2023 | 46.9 | 365 |
| 2022 | 45.8 | 358 |
| 2021 | 44.7 | 353 |
| 2020 | 43.6 | 359 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 358 |
| 2018 | 41.6 | 357 |
| 2017 | 40.6 | 355 |
| 2016 | 39.6 | 354 |
| 2015 | 38.7 | 354 |
| 2014 | 37.7 | 353 |
| 2013 | 36.8 | 353 |
| 2012 | 36 | 352 |
| 2011 | 35 | 352 |
| 2010 | 33.8 | 351 |
| 2009 | 32.5 | 350 |
| 2008 | 31.2 | 348 |
| 2007 | 30.2 | 345 |
| 2006 | 29.1 | 343 |
| 2005 | 28 | 342 |
| 2004 | 27 | 342 |
| 2003 | 26.1 | 342 |
| 2002 | 25.4 | 342 |
| 2001 | 24.8 | 342 |
| 2000 | 23.9 | 344 |
| 1999 | 23 | 345 |
| 1998 | 22.4 | 345 |
| 1997 | 21.9 | 345 |
| 1996 | 21.4 | 346 |
| 1995 | 20.9 | 346 |
| 1994 | 20.3 | 346 |
| 1993 | 19.7 | 346 |
| 1992 | 19.1 | - |
| 1991 | 18.6 | - |
| 1990 | 18.1 | - |
| 1989 | 17.5 | - |
| 1988 | 17 | - |
| 1987 | 16.6 | - |
| 1986 | 16.1 | - |
| 1985 | 15.6 | - |
| 1984 | 15.2 | - |
| 1983 | 14.8 | - |
| 1982 | 14.5 | - |
| 1981 | 14.2 | - |
| 1980 | 13.9 | - |
| 1979 | 13.6 | - |
| 1978 | 13.3 | - |
| 1977 | 13 | - |
| 1976 | 12.6 | - |
| 1975 | 12.3 | - |
| 1974 | 12 | - |
| 1973 | 11.6 | - |
| 1972 | 11.3 | - |
| 1971 | 10.9 | - |
| 1970 | 10.6 | - |
| 1969 | 10.3 | - |
| 1968 | 9.98 | - |
| 1967 | 9.7 | - |
| 1966 | 9.42 | - |
| 1965 | 9.16 | - |
| 1964 | 8.91 | - |
| 1963 | 8.67 | - |
| 1962 | 8.44 | - |
| 1961 | 8.22 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 69.6% | 74.7% |
| 2023 | 69.2% | 74.6% |
| 2022 | 68.7% | 74.4% |
| 2021 | 68.3% | 74.2% |
| 2020 | 67.8% | 74.1% |
| 2019 | 67.4% | 73.9% |
| 2018 | 66.9% | 73.8% |
| 2017 | 66.5% | 73.7% |
| 2016 | 66% | 73.6% |
| 2015 | 65.5% | 73.5% |
| 2014 | 65.1% | 73.4% |
| 2013 | 64.6% | 73.3% |
| 2012 | 64.2% | 73.2% |
| 2011 | 63.7% | 73.2% |
| 2010 | 63.3% | 73.3% |
| 2009 | 62.8% | 73.3% |
| 2008 | 62.3% | 73.4% |
| 2007 | 61.9% | 73.5% |
| 2006 | 61.4% | 73.5% |
| 2005 | 61% | 73.6% |
| 2004 | 60.5% | 73.7% |
| 2003 | 60.1% | 73.7% |
| 2002 | 59.6% | 73.8% |
| 2001 | 59.2% | 73.9% |
| 2000 | 58.7% | 74% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 74.1% |
| 1998 | 57.8% | 74.3% |
| 1997 | 57.3% | 74.4% |
| 1996 | 56.8% | 74.5% |
| 1995 | 56.4% | 74.6% |
| 1994 | 56% | 74.8% |
| 1993 | 55.6% | 74.9% |
| 1992 | 55.2% | 75% |
| 1991 | 54.7% | 75.2% |
| 1990 | 54.3% | 75.2% |
| 1989 | 53.9% | 75.2% |
| 1988 | 53.5% | 75.3% |
| 1987 | 53.1% | 75.3% |
| 1986 | 52.6% | 75.3% |
| 1985 | 52.2% | 75.4% |
| 1984 | 51.6% | 75.4% |
| 1983 | 50.6% | 75.4% |
| 1982 | 49.7% | 75.5% |
| 1981 | 48.8% | 75.5% |
| 1980 | 47.9% | 75.2% |
| 1979 | 46.9% | 74.2% |
| 1978 | 46% | 73.1% |
| 1977 | 45.1% | 72.1% |
| 1976 | 44.2% | 71% |
| 1975 | 43.3% | 69.9% |
| 1974 | 42.4% | 68.8% |
| 1973 | 41.5% | 67.6% |
| 1972 | 40.7% | 66.5% |
| 1971 | 39.9% | 65.3% |
| 1970 | 39.1% | 64.4% |
| 1969 | 38.3% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 63.5% |
| 1967 | 36.8% | 63% |
| 1966 | 36% | 62.5% |
| 1965 | 35.3% | 62% |
| 1964 | 34.5% | 61.5% |
| 1963 | 33.8% | 61% |
| 1962 | 33% | 60.6% |
| 1961 | 32.3% | 60.1% |
| 1960 | 31.6% | 59.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 60.5% to 69.6% in the Congo and from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Brazzaville | 2.15M |
| Pointe-Noire | 1.42M |
| Kayes | 71.6K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons