The Czech Republic has a population density of 365 people per square mile compared to 150.9 people in Liberia. The Czech Republic has 78,009 sq ft of land per person vs 213,577 sq ft in Liberia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Czech Republic and Liberia are ranked 69th and 131st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Liberia, hence the population density in the Czech Republic is 142% higher than in Liberia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 365 ppl/mi² | 150.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 69/197 | 131/197 |
| Population |
10753822
|
5829811
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 37,189 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,329 sq ft | 184,716 sq ft |
| Rural population | 25.3% | 45.9% |
| Urban population | 74.7% | 54.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.8% | 18.2% |
the Czech Republic vs Liberia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 6.85%, compared to a 77.8% growth in Liberia.
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked 59th for population density and is in 69th place now. Liberia was 140th in 2004 and ranks 131st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 365 | 150.9 |
| 2023 | 365 | 147.7 |
| 2022 | 358 | 144.5 |
| 2021 | 353 | 141.4 |
| 2020 | 359 | 138.5 |
| 2019 | 358 | 135.6 |
| 2018 | 357 | 133 |
| 2017 | 355 | 130.4 |
| 2016 | 354 | 127.9 |
| 2015 | 354 | 125.3 |
| 2014 | 353 | 122.7 |
| 2013 | 353 | 120.2 |
| 2012 | 352 | 117.6 |
| 2011 | 352 | 113.5 |
| 2010 | 351 | 109.1 |
| 2009 | 350 | 106 |
| 2008 | 348 | 102.7 |
| 2007 | 345 | 98.7 |
| 2006 | 343 | 93.9 |
| 2005 | 342 | 88.8 |
| 2004 | 342 | 84.9 |
| 2003 | 342 | 83.9 |
| 2002 | 342 | 83.2 |
| 2001 | 342 | 81.1 |
| 2000 | 344 | 78.7 |
| 1999 | 345 | 75.9 |
| 1998 | 345 | 71.8 |
| 1997 | 345 | 64.9 |
| 1996 | 346 | 60 |
| 1995 | 346 | 58.3 |
| 1994 | 346 | 57.8 |
| 1993 | 346 | 58 |
| 1992 | - | 55.7 |
| 1991 | - | 52.6 |
| 1990 | - | 59.8 |
| 1989 | - | 67.7 |
| 1988 | - | 65.8 |
| 1987 | - | 63.9 |
| 1986 | - | 62.1 |
| 1985 | - | 60.2 |
| 1984 | - | 58.4 |
| 1983 | - | 56.7 |
| 1982 | - | 55 |
| 1981 | - | 53.4 |
| 1980 | - | 51.9 |
| 1979 | - | 50.4 |
| 1978 | - | 48.9 |
| 1977 | - | 47.5 |
| 1976 | - | 46.2 |
| 1975 | - | 44.9 |
| 1974 | - | 43.7 |
| 1973 | - | 42.6 |
| 1972 | - | 41.5 |
| 1971 | - | 40.4 |
| 1970 | - | 39.4 |
| 1969 | - | 38.4 |
| 1968 | - | 37.5 |
| 1967 | - | 36.5 |
| 1966 | - | 35.6 |
| 1965 | - | 34.7 |
| 1964 | - | 33.8 |
| 1963 | - | 33 |
| 1962 | - | 32.2 |
| 1961 | - | 31.4 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 74.7% | 54.1% |
| 2023 | 74.6% | 53.6% |
| 2022 | 74.4% | 53.1% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 52.6% |
| 2020 | 74.1% | 52.1% |
| 2019 | 73.9% | 51.6% |
| 2018 | 73.8% | 51.2% |
| 2017 | 73.7% | 50.7% |
| 2016 | 73.6% | 50.3% |
| 2015 | 73.5% | 49.8% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | 49.4% |
| 2013 | 73.3% | 49% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 48.6% |
| 2011 | 73.2% | 48.2% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 47.8% |
| 2009 | 73.3% | 47.4% |
| 2008 | 73.4% | 47.1% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 46.7% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 46.4% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 46.1% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 45.7% |
| 2003 | 73.7% | 45.4% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 45% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 44.7% |
| 2000 | 74% | 44.3% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 44% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 43.6% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 43.3% |
| 1996 | 74.5% | 43% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 46% |
| 1994 | 74.8% | 49% |
| 1993 | 74.9% | 52% |
| 1992 | 75% | 55% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 58% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 55.4% |
| 1989 | 75.2% | 52.8% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 50.2% |
| 1987 | 75.3% | 47.6% |
| 1986 | 75.3% | 45% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 42.4% |
| 1984 | 75.4% | 39.8% |
| 1983 | 75.4% | 38.2% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 37.2% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 36.2% |
| 1980 | 75.2% | 35.2% |
| 1979 | 74.2% | 34.2% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 33.2% |
| 1977 | 72.1% | 32.3% |
| 1976 | 71% | 31.3% |
| 1975 | 69.9% | 30.4% |
| 1974 | 68.8% | 29.5% |
| 1973 | 67.6% | 28.6% |
| 1972 | 66.5% | 27.7% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 26.9% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 26% |
| 1969 | 63.9% | 25.2% |
| 1968 | 63.5% | 24.4% |
| 1967 | 63% | 23.6% |
| 1966 | 62.5% | 22.9% |
| 1965 | 62% | 22.1% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 21.4% |
| 1963 | 61% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 20% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 19.3% |
| 1960 | 59.5% | 18.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic and from 45.7% to 54.1% in Liberia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons