Bolivia has a population density of 29.7 people per square mile compared to 365 people in the Czech Republic. Bolivia has 952,608 sq ft of land per person vs 78,009 sq ft in the Czech Republic. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bolivia and the Czech Republic are ranked 183rd and 69th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bolivia has 0.15% of the world's population and 0.73% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.05% of the land area for the Czech Republic, hence the population density in Bolivia is 91.9% lower than in the Czech Republic.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 29.7 ppl/mi² | 365 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 183/197 | 69/197 |
| Population |
12716350
|
10753822
|
| Land area | 418,264 sq mi | 29,794 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 939,358 sq ft | 76,329 sq ft |
| Rural population | 28.5% | 25.3% |
| Urban population | 71.5% | 74.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 25.4% | 12.8% |
Bolivia vs the Czech Republic:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bolivia increased by 34.9%, compared to a 6.85% growth in the Czech Republic.
In 2004, Bolivia ranked 177th for population density and is in 183rd place now. The Czech Republic was 59th in 2004 and ranks 69th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 29.7 | 365 |
| 2023 | 29.3 | 365 |
| 2022 | 28.9 | 358 |
| 2021 | 28.5 | 353 |
| 2020 | 28.3 | 359 |
| 2019 | 27.9 | 358 |
| 2018 | 27.5 | 357 |
| 2017 | 27.1 | 355 |
| 2016 | 26.7 | 354 |
| 2015 | 26.3 | 354 |
| 2014 | 25.9 | 353 |
| 2013 | 25.5 | 353 |
| 2012 | 25.1 | 352 |
| 2011 | 24.7 | 352 |
| 2010 | 24.3 | 351 |
| 2009 | 23.9 | 350 |
| 2008 | 23.6 | 348 |
| 2007 | 23.2 | 345 |
| 2006 | 22.8 | 343 |
| 2005 | 22.4 | 342 |
| 2004 | 22 | 342 |
| 2003 | 21.6 | 342 |
| 2002 | 21.3 | 342 |
| 2001 | 20.9 | 342 |
| 2000 | 20.6 | 344 |
| 1999 | 20.2 | 345 |
| 1998 | 19.9 | 345 |
| 1997 | 19.5 | 345 |
| 1996 | 19.2 | 346 |
| 1995 | 18.8 | 346 |
| 1994 | 18.5 | 346 |
| 1993 | 18.1 | 346 |
| 1992 | 17.8 | - |
| 1991 | 17.4 | - |
| 1990 | 17 | - |
| 1989 | 16.7 | - |
| 1988 | 16.3 | - |
| 1987 | 16 | - |
| 1986 | 15.7 | - |
| 1985 | 15.3 | - |
| 1984 | 15 | - |
| 1983 | 14.7 | - |
| 1982 | 14.4 | - |
| 1981 | 14.1 | - |
| 1980 | 13.8 | - |
| 1979 | 13.5 | - |
| 1978 | 13.2 | - |
| 1977 | 12.9 | - |
| 1976 | 12.6 | - |
| 1975 | 12.3 | - |
| 1974 | 12 | - |
| 1973 | 11.7 | - |
| 1972 | 11.5 | - |
| 1971 | 11.2 | - |
| 1970 | 11 | - |
| 1969 | 10.7 | - |
| 1968 | 10.5 | - |
| 1967 | 10.3 | - |
| 1966 | 10 | - |
| 1965 | 9.83 | - |
| 1964 | 9.62 | - |
| 1963 | 9.42 | - |
| 1962 | 9.22 | - |
| 1961 | 9.03 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 71.5% | 74.7% |
| 2023 | 71.2% | 74.6% |
| 2022 | 70.8% | 74.4% |
| 2021 | 70.5% | 74.2% |
| 2020 | 70.1% | 74.1% |
| 2019 | 69.8% | 73.9% |
| 2018 | 69.4% | 73.8% |
| 2017 | 69.1% | 73.7% |
| 2016 | 68.7% | 73.6% |
| 2015 | 68.4% | 73.5% |
| 2014 | 68% | 73.4% |
| 2013 | 67.7% | 73.3% |
| 2012 | 67.3% | 73.2% |
| 2011 | 66.9% | 73.2% |
| 2010 | 66.4% | 73.3% |
| 2009 | 66% | 73.3% |
| 2008 | 65.5% | 73.4% |
| 2007 | 65.1% | 73.5% |
| 2006 | 64.6% | 73.5% |
| 2005 | 64.2% | 73.6% |
| 2004 | 63.7% | 73.7% |
| 2003 | 63.2% | 73.7% |
| 2002 | 62.8% | 73.8% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 73.9% |
| 2000 | 61.8% | 74% |
| 1999 | 61.3% | 74.1% |
| 1998 | 60.7% | 74.3% |
| 1997 | 60.2% | 74.4% |
| 1996 | 59.7% | 74.5% |
| 1995 | 59.2% | 74.6% |
| 1994 | 58.6% | 74.8% |
| 1993 | 58.1% | 74.9% |
| 1992 | 57.5% | 75% |
| 1991 | 56.6% | 75.2% |
| 1990 | 55.6% | 75.2% |
| 1989 | 54.6% | 75.2% |
| 1988 | 53.6% | 75.3% |
| 1987 | 52.5% | 75.3% |
| 1986 | 51.5% | 75.3% |
| 1985 | 50.5% | 75.4% |
| 1984 | 49.5% | 75.4% |
| 1983 | 48.5% | 75.4% |
| 1982 | 47.5% | 75.5% |
| 1981 | 46.5% | 75.5% |
| 1980 | 45.5% | 75.2% |
| 1979 | 44.4% | 74.2% |
| 1978 | 43.4% | 73.1% |
| 1977 | 42.4% | 72.1% |
| 1976 | 41.6% | 71% |
| 1975 | 41.3% | 69.9% |
| 1974 | 41% | 68.8% |
| 1973 | 40.7% | 67.6% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 66.5% |
| 1971 | 40.1% | 65.3% |
| 1970 | 39.8% | 64.4% |
| 1969 | 39.5% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 39.2% | 63.5% |
| 1967 | 38.9% | 63% |
| 1966 | 38.6% | 62.5% |
| 1965 | 38.3% | 62% |
| 1964 | 38% | 61.5% |
| 1963 | 37.7% | 61% |
| 1962 | 37.4% | 60.6% |
| 1961 | 37.1% | 60.1% |
| 1960 | 36.8% | 59.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 63.7% to 71.5% in Bolivia and from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santa Cruz de la Sierra | 3.15M |
| El Alto | 842K |
| La Paz | 756K |
| Cochabamba | 632K |
| Sucre | 361K |
| Oruro | 265K |
| Potosi | 190K |
| Tarija | 180K |
| Sacaba | 172K |
| Trinidad | 124K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons