The Czech Republic has a population density of 365 people per square mile compared to 614 people in the Dominican Republic. The Czech Republic has 78,009 sq ft of land per person vs 45,844 sq ft in the Dominican Republic. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Czech Republic and the Dominican Republic are ranked 69th and 49th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.14% of the population and 0.03% of the land area for the Dominican Republic, hence the population density in the Czech Republic is 40.5% lower than in the Dominican Republic.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 365 ppl/mi² | 614 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 69/197 | 49/197 |
| Population |
10753822
|
11591984
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 18,609 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,329 sq ft | 45,399 sq ft |
| Rural population | 25.3% | 15% |
| Urban population | 74.7% | 85% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.8% | 21.6% |
the Czech Republic vs the Dominican Republic:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 6.85%, compared to a 25.8% growth in the Dominican Republic.
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked 59th for population density and is in 69th place now. The Dominican Republic was 43rd in 2004 and ranks 49th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 365 | 614 |
| 2023 | 365 | 609 |
| 2022 | 358 | 603 |
| 2021 | 353 | 598 |
| 2020 | 359 | 592 |
| 2019 | 358 | 585 |
| 2018 | 357 | 578 |
| 2017 | 355 | 572 |
| 2016 | 354 | 566 |
| 2015 | 354 | 559 |
| 2014 | 353 | 553 |
| 2013 | 353 | 547 |
| 2012 | 352 | 540 |
| 2011 | 352 | 533 |
| 2010 | 351 | 526 |
| 2009 | 350 | 520 |
| 2008 | 348 | 513 |
| 2007 | 345 | 507 |
| 2006 | 343 | 501 |
| 2005 | 342 | 495 |
| 2004 | 342 | 488 |
| 2003 | 342 | 481 |
| 2002 | 342 | 475 |
| 2001 | 342 | 468 |
| 2000 | 344 | 460 |
| 1999 | 345 | 453 |
| 1998 | 345 | 446 |
| 1997 | 345 | 438 |
| 1996 | 346 | 431 |
| 1995 | 346 | 423 |
| 1994 | 346 | 415 |
| 1993 | 346 | 407 |
| 1992 | - | 399 |
| 1991 | - | 391 |
| 1990 | - | 383 |
| 1989 | - | 375 |
| 1988 | - | 368 |
| 1987 | - | 360 |
| 1986 | - | 352 |
| 1985 | - | 345 |
| 1984 | - | 337 |
| 1983 | - | 330 |
| 1982 | - | 322 |
| 1981 | - | 315 |
| 1980 | - | 307 |
| 1979 | - | 299.7 |
| 1978 | - | 292.3 |
| 1977 | - | 285 |
| 1976 | - | 277.7 |
| 1975 | - | 270.6 |
| 1974 | - | 263.5 |
| 1973 | - | 256.4 |
| 1972 | - | 249.4 |
| 1971 | - | 242.6 |
| 1970 | - | 235.9 |
| 1969 | - | 229.3 |
| 1968 | - | 222.9 |
| 1967 | - | 216.5 |
| 1966 | - | 210.3 |
| 1965 | - | 204.2 |
| 1964 | - | 198.3 |
| 1963 | - | 192.4 |
| 1962 | - | 186.6 |
| 1961 | - | 180.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 74.7% | 85% |
| 2023 | 74.6% | 84.4% |
| 2022 | 74.4% | 83.8% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 83.2% |
| 2020 | 74.1% | 82.5% |
| 2019 | 73.9% | 81.8% |
| 2018 | 73.8% | 81.1% |
| 2017 | 73.7% | 80.3% |
| 2016 | 73.6% | 79.4% |
| 2015 | 73.5% | 78.6% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | 77.7% |
| 2013 | 73.3% | 76.7% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 75.8% |
| 2011 | 73.2% | 74.8% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 73.8% |
| 2009 | 73.3% | 72.5% |
| 2008 | 73.4% | 71.3% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 70% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 68.7% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 67.4% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 66% |
| 2003 | 73.7% | 64.6% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 63.4% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 62.6% |
| 2000 | 74% | 61.8% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 60.9% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 60.1% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 59.3% |
| 1996 | 74.5% | 58.4% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 57.6% |
| 1994 | 74.8% | 56.8% |
| 1993 | 74.9% | 56% |
| 1992 | 75% | 55.8% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 55.5% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 55.2% |
| 1989 | 75.2% | 55% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 54.7% |
| 1987 | 75.3% | 54.4% |
| 1986 | 75.3% | 54.1% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 53.9% |
| 1984 | 75.4% | 53.6% |
| 1983 | 75.4% | 53.3% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 53.1% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 52.4% |
| 1980 | 75.2% | 51.3% |
| 1979 | 74.2% | 50.2% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 49.1% |
| 1977 | 72.1% | 47.9% |
| 1976 | 71% | 46.8% |
| 1975 | 69.9% | 45.7% |
| 1974 | 68.8% | 44.6% |
| 1973 | 67.6% | 43.5% |
| 1972 | 66.5% | 42.4% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 41.4% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 40.3% |
| 1969 | 63.9% | 39.2% |
| 1968 | 63.5% | 38.2% |
| 1967 | 63% | 37.1% |
| 1966 | 62.5% | 36.1% |
| 1965 | 62% | 35.1% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 34% |
| 1963 | 61% | 33.1% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 32.1% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 31.1% |
| 1960 | 59.5% | 30.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic and from 66% to 85% in the Dominican Republic.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santiago de los Caballeros | 1.34M |
| Santo Domingo | 1.13M |
| Puerto Plata | 338K |
| La Vega | 282K |
| Higuey | 251K |
| San Cristobal | 233K |
| San Pedro de Macoris | 217K |
| San Francisco de Macoris | 188K |
| San Juan de la Maguana | 169K |
| Bonao | 158K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons