The Czech Republic has a population density of 365 people per square mile compared to 60.5 people in Papua New Guinea. The Czech Republic has 78,009 sq ft of land per person vs 471,041 sq ft in Papua New Guinea. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Czech Republic and Papua New Guinea are ranked 69th and 165th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.3% of the land area for Papua New Guinea, hence the population density in the Czech Republic is 504% higher than in Papua New Guinea.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 365 ppl/mi² | 60.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 69/197 | 165/197 |
| Population |
10753822
|
10911445
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 174,850 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,329 sq ft | 460,884 sq ft |
| Rural population | 25.3% | 86.1% |
| Urban population | 74.7% | 13.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.8% | 0% |
the Czech Republic vs Papua New Guinea:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 6.85%, compared to a 67.1% growth in Papua New Guinea.
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked 59th for population density and is in 69th place now. Papua New Guinea was 166th in 2004 and ranks 165th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 365 | 60.5 |
| 2023 | 365 | 59.4 |
| 2022 | 358 | 58.4 |
| 2021 | 353 | 57.3 |
| 2020 | 359 | 56.1 |
| 2019 | 358 | 55 |
| 2018 | 357 | 53.7 |
| 2017 | 355 | 52.5 |
| 2016 | 354 | 51.3 |
| 2015 | 354 | 50 |
| 2014 | 353 | 48.7 |
| 2013 | 353 | 47.5 |
| 2012 | 352 | 46.2 |
| 2011 | 352 | 44.9 |
| 2010 | 351 | 43.7 |
| 2009 | 350 | 42.4 |
| 2008 | 348 | 41.1 |
| 2007 | 345 | 39.8 |
| 2006 | 343 | 38.6 |
| 2005 | 342 | 37.4 |
| 2004 | 342 | 36.2 |
| 2003 | 342 | 35 |
| 2002 | 342 | 33.9 |
| 2001 | 342 | 32.8 |
| 2000 | 344 | 31.7 |
| 1999 | 345 | 30.6 |
| 1998 | 345 | 29.5 |
| 1997 | 345 | 28.5 |
| 1996 | 346 | 27.5 |
| 1995 | 346 | 26.6 |
| 1994 | 346 | 25.6 |
| 1993 | 346 | 24.7 |
| 1992 | - | 23.8 |
| 1991 | - | 23 |
| 1990 | - | 22.3 |
| 1989 | - | 21.7 |
| 1988 | - | 21.2 |
| 1987 | - | 20.8 |
| 1986 | - | 20.3 |
| 1985 | - | 19.9 |
| 1984 | - | 19.5 |
| 1983 | - | 19.1 |
| 1982 | - | 18.7 |
| 1981 | - | 18.3 |
| 1980 | - | 17.9 |
| 1979 | - | 17.5 |
| 1978 | - | 17.2 |
| 1977 | - | 16.8 |
| 1976 | - | 16.5 |
| 1975 | - | 16.1 |
| 1974 | - | 15.7 |
| 1973 | - | 15.4 |
| 1972 | - | 15 |
| 1971 | - | 14.7 |
| 1970 | - | 14.3 |
| 1969 | - | 14 |
| 1968 | - | 13.7 |
| 1967 | - | 13.4 |
| 1966 | - | 13.1 |
| 1965 | - | 12.8 |
| 1964 | - | 12.5 |
| 1963 | - | 12.2 |
| 1962 | - | 12 |
| 1961 | - | 11.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 74.7% | 13.9% |
| 2023 | 74.6% | 13.7% |
| 2022 | 74.4% | 13.6% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 13.5% |
| 2020 | 74.1% | 13.3% |
| 2019 | 73.9% | 13.3% |
| 2018 | 73.8% | 13.2% |
| 2017 | 73.7% | 13.1% |
| 2016 | 73.6% | 13% |
| 2015 | 73.5% | 13% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | 13% |
| 2013 | 73.3% | 13% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 13% |
| 2011 | 73.2% | 13% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 13% |
| 2009 | 73.3% | 13% |
| 2008 | 73.4% | 13.1% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 13.1% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 13.1% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 13.1% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 13.1% |
| 2003 | 73.7% | 13.1% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 13.2% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 13.2% |
| 2000 | 74% | 13.2% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 13.4% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 13.5% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 13.7% |
| 1996 | 74.5% | 13.9% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 14.1% |
| 1994 | 74.8% | 14.3% |
| 1993 | 74.9% | 14.4% |
| 1992 | 75% | 14.6% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 14.8% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 15% |
| 1989 | 75.2% | 14.8% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 14.6% |
| 1987 | 75.3% | 14.4% |
| 1986 | 75.3% | 14.2% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 14% |
| 1984 | 75.4% | 13.8% |
| 1983 | 75.4% | 13.6% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 13.4% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 13.2% |
| 1980 | 75.2% | 13% |
| 1979 | 74.2% | 12.8% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 12.6% |
| 1977 | 72.1% | 12.4% |
| 1976 | 71% | 12.1% |
| 1975 | 69.9% | 11.9% |
| 1974 | 68.8% | 11.7% |
| 1973 | 67.6% | 11.5% |
| 1972 | 66.5% | 11.3% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 11.1% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 9.8% |
| 1969 | 63.9% | 8.65% |
| 1968 | 63.5% | 7.63% |
| 1967 | 63% | 6.71% |
| 1966 | 62.5% | 5.9% |
| 1965 | 62% | 5.47% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 5.07% |
| 1963 | 61% | 4.69% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 4.35% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 4.02% |
| 1960 | 59.5% | 3.73% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic and from 13.1% to 13.9% in Papua New Guinea.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Port Moresby | 317K |
| Lae | 101K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons