The Czech Republic has a population density of 357 people per square mile compared to 372 people in Tonga. The Czech Republic has 77,850 sq ft of land per person vs 77,340 sq ft in Tonga. The Czech Republic and Tonga rank 71st and 69th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.001% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Tonga, making the population density in the Czech Republic 3.82% lower than in Tonga.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Czech Republic
|
Tonga
|
|
| 2026 | 357 | 372 |
| 2025 | 362 | 373 |
| 2024 | 366 | 375 |
| 2023 | 365 | 376 |
| 2022 | 358 | 378 |
| 2021 | 353 | 379 |
| 2020 | 359 | 380 |
| 2019 | 358 | 380 |
| 2018 | 357 | 380 |
| 2017 | 355 | 379 |
| 2016 | 354 | 380 |
| 2015 | 354 | 382 |
| 2014 | 353 | 383 |
| 2013 | 353 | 385 |
| 2012 | 352 | 387 |
| 2011 | 352 | 387 |
| 2010 | 351 | 386 |
| 2009 | 350 | 386 |
| 2008 | 348 | 385 |
| 2007 | 345 | 384 |
| 2006 | 343 | 382 |
| 2005 | 342 | 380 |
| 2004 | 342 | 378 |
| 2003 | 342 | 376 |
| 2002 | 342 | 374 |
| 2001 | 342 | 372 |
| 2000 | 344 | 369 |
| 1999 | 345 | 367 |
| 1998 | 345 | 365 |
| 1997 | 345 | 362 |
| 1996 | 346 | 361 |
| 1995 | 346 | 361 |
| 1994 | 346 | 360 |
| 1993 | 346 | 360 |
| 1992 | - | 360 |
| 1991 | - | 359 |
| 1990 | - | 359 |
| 1989 | - | 358 |
| 1988 | - | 356 |
| 1987 | - | 354 |
| 1986 | - | 353 |
| 1985 | - | 352 |
| 1984 | - | 352 |
| 1983 | - | 353 |
| 1982 | - | 352 |
| 1981 | - | 352 |
| 1980 | - | 352 |
| 1979 | - | 351 |
| 1978 | - | 350 |
| 1977 | - | 348 |
| 1976 | - | 343 |
| 1975 | - | 335 |
| 1974 | - | 326 |
| 1973 | - | 319 |
| 1972 | - | 314 |
| 1971 | - | 309 |
| 1970 | - | 304 |
| 1969 | - | 298.2 |
| 1968 | - | 292.6 |
| 1967 | - | 287.1 |
| 1966 | - | 280.6 |
| 1965 | - | 273.1 |
| 1964 | - | 265.8 |
| 1963 | - | 258.6 |
| 1962 | - | 251.6 |
| 1961 | - | 244.7 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/czech-republic/tonga | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 4.12%, compared to a 2.77% decline in Tonga.
In 2006, the Czech Republic ranked 60th by population density and is 71st now. Tonga was 54th in 2006 and ranks 69th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Czech Republic
|
Tonga
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 357 ppl/mi² | 372 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 71/197 | 69/197 |
| Population |
10649126
|
103309
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 278 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,169 sq ft | 74,394 sq ft |
| Rural population | 27.2% | 78.8% |
| Urban population | 72.8% | 21.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 13.1% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Czech Republic
|
Tonga
|
|
| 2024 | 72.8% | 21.2% |
| 2023 | 72.7% | 21.1% |
| 2022 | 72.7% | 21.1% |
| 2021 | 72.7% | 21.3% |
| 2020 | 72.7% | 21.9% |
| 2019 | 72.8% | 22.3% |
| 2018 | 72.8% | 22.7% |
| 2017 | 72.9% | 23% |
| 2016 | 73% | 23.1% |
| 2015 | 73% | 23.2% |
| 2014 | 73.1% | 23.3% |
| 2013 | 73.2% | 23.4% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 23.5% |
| 2011 | 73.3% | 23.5% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 23.4% |
| 2009 | 73.4% | 23.4% |
| 2008 | 73.5% | 23.3% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 23.2% |
| 2006 | 73.6% | 23.2% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 23.1% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 23.1% |
| 2003 | 73.8% | 23.1% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 23.1% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 23% |
| 2000 | 74% | 23% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 23% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 23% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 22.9% |
| 1996 | 74.6% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 74.7% | 22.8% |
| 1994 | 74.9% | 22.7% |
| 1993 | 75% | 22.6% |
| 1992 | 75.1% | 22.5% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 22.4% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 22.2% |
| 1989 | 75.3% | 22% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 21.9% |
| 1987 | 75.4% | 21.7% |
| 1986 | 75.4% | 21.5% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 21.4% |
| 1984 | 75.5% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 75.5% | 21% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 20.9% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 20.7% |
| 1980 | 74.7% | 20.6% |
| 1979 | 70.1% | 20.5% |
| 1978 | 69.7% | 20.4% |
| 1977 | 70.4% | 20.4% |
| 1976 | 69.5% | 20.3% |
| 1975 | 67.3% | 20.3% |
| 1974 | 67% | 20.3% |
| 1973 | 66.4% | 20.2% |
| 1972 | 65.7% | 20.2% |
| 1971 | 65% | 20.2% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 20.2% |
| 1969 | 63.8% | 20.2% |
| 1968 | 63.3% | 20.1% |
| 1967 | 62.8% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 62.4% | 20% |
| 1965 | 61.9% | 19.9% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 19.7% |
| 1963 | 61% | 19.4% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 18.7% |
| 1960 | 59.6% | 18.3% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/czech-republic/tonga | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 73.7% to 72.8% in the Czech Republic and from 23.1% to 21.2% in Tonga.
Densely populated cities
|
Czech Republic
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Ostrava | 283K |
| Plzen | 188K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Olomouc | 103K |
| Ceske Budejovice | 97.2K |
| Hradec Kralove | 94.3K |
| Pardubice | 92.3K |
| Usti nad Labem | 90.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/czech-republic/tonga | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.