The Czech Republic has a population density of 365 people per square mile compared to 10.9 people in Libya. The Czech Republic has 78,009 sq ft of land per person vs 2,565,978 sq ft in Libya. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Czech Republic and Libya are ranked 69th and 191st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Czech Republic has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.09% of the population and 1.18% of the land area for Libya, hence the population density in the Czech Republic is 3,262% higher than in Libya.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 365 ppl/mi² | 10.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 69/197 | 191/197 |
| Population |
10753822
|
7523849
|
| Land area | 29,794 sq mi | 679,362 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 76,329 sq ft | 2,565,976 sq ft |
| Rural population | 25.3% | 18.1% |
| Urban population | 74.7% | 81.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 12.8% | 31.2% |
the Czech Republic vs Libya:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Czech Republic increased by 6.85%, compared to a 28.7% growth in Libya.
In 2004, the Czech Republic ranked 59th for population density and is in 69th place now. Libya was 185th in 2004 and ranks 191st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 365 | 10.9 |
| 2023 | 365 | 10.8 |
| 2022 | 358 | 10.6 |
| 2021 | 353 | 10.5 |
| 2020 | 359 | 10.4 |
| 2019 | 358 | 10.2 |
| 2018 | 357 | 10.1 |
| 2017 | 355 | 9.92 |
| 2016 | 354 | 9.76 |
| 2015 | 354 | 9.61 |
| 2014 | 353 | 9.46 |
| 2013 | 353 | 9.28 |
| 2012 | 352 | 9.1 |
| 2011 | 352 | 9.34 |
| 2010 | 351 | 9.56 |
| 2009 | 350 | 9.37 |
| 2008 | 348 | 9.18 |
| 2007 | 345 | 8.99 |
| 2006 | 343 | 8.8 |
| 2005 | 342 | 8.62 |
| 2004 | 342 | 8.44 |
| 2003 | 342 | 8.27 |
| 2002 | 342 | 8.11 |
| 2001 | 342 | 7.95 |
| 2000 | 344 | 7.81 |
| 1999 | 345 | 7.68 |
| 1998 | 345 | 7.57 |
| 1997 | 345 | 7.45 |
| 1996 | 346 | 7.34 |
| 1995 | 346 | 7.22 |
| 1994 | 346 | 7.1 |
| 1993 | 346 | 6.97 |
| 1992 | - | 6.83 |
| 1991 | - | 6.69 |
| 1990 | - | 6.54 |
| 1989 | - | 6.39 |
| 1988 | - | 6.24 |
| 1987 | - | 6.08 |
| 1986 | - | 5.91 |
| 1985 | - | 5.74 |
| 1984 | - | 5.55 |
| 1983 | - | 5.47 |
| 1982 | - | 5.48 |
| 1981 | - | 5.33 |
| 1980 | - | 5.04 |
| 1979 | - | 4.76 |
| 1978 | - | 4.49 |
| 1977 | - | 4.24 |
| 1976 | - | 4.01 |
| 1975 | - | 3.79 |
| 1974 | - | 3.58 |
| 1973 | - | 3.41 |
| 1972 | - | 3.28 |
| 1971 | - | 3.17 |
| 1970 | - | 3.07 |
| 1969 | - | 2.96 |
| 1968 | - | 2.87 |
| 1967 | - | 2.79 |
| 1966 | - | 2.72 |
| 1965 | - | 2.66 |
| 1964 | - | 2.58 |
| 1963 | - | 2.49 |
| 1962 | - | 2.39 |
| 1961 | - | 2.29 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 74.7% | 81.9% |
| 2023 | 74.6% | 81.6% |
| 2022 | 74.4% | 81.3% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 81% |
| 2020 | 74.1% | 80.7% |
| 2019 | 73.9% | 80.4% |
| 2018 | 73.8% | 80.1% |
| 2017 | 73.7% | 79.8% |
| 2016 | 73.6% | 79.5% |
| 2015 | 73.5% | 79.3% |
| 2014 | 73.4% | 79% |
| 2013 | 73.3% | 78.8% |
| 2012 | 73.2% | 78.5% |
| 2011 | 73.2% | 78.3% |
| 2010 | 73.3% | 78.1% |
| 2009 | 73.3% | 77.8% |
| 2008 | 73.4% | 77.6% |
| 2007 | 73.5% | 77.4% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 77.3% |
| 2005 | 73.6% | 77.1% |
| 2004 | 73.7% | 76.9% |
| 2003 | 73.7% | 76.8% |
| 2002 | 73.8% | 76.6% |
| 2001 | 73.9% | 76.5% |
| 2000 | 74% | 76.4% |
| 1999 | 74.1% | 76.3% |
| 1998 | 74.3% | 76.2% |
| 1997 | 74.4% | 76.1% |
| 1996 | 74.5% | 76% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 76% |
| 1994 | 74.8% | 75.9% |
| 1993 | 74.9% | 75.9% |
| 1992 | 75% | 75.8% |
| 1991 | 75.2% | 75.8% |
| 1990 | 75.2% | 75.7% |
| 1989 | 75.2% | 75.7% |
| 1988 | 75.3% | 75.6% |
| 1987 | 75.3% | 75.6% |
| 1986 | 75.3% | 75.5% |
| 1985 | 75.4% | 75.4% |
| 1984 | 75.4% | 75.3% |
| 1983 | 75.4% | 74.1% |
| 1982 | 75.5% | 72.8% |
| 1981 | 75.5% | 71.5% |
| 1980 | 75.2% | 70.1% |
| 1979 | 74.2% | 68.7% |
| 1978 | 73.1% | 67.3% |
| 1977 | 72.1% | 65.8% |
| 1976 | 71% | 64.3% |
| 1975 | 69.9% | 62.8% |
| 1974 | 68.8% | 61.2% |
| 1973 | 67.6% | 59.5% |
| 1972 | 66.5% | 56.3% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 53% |
| 1970 | 64.4% | 49.7% |
| 1969 | 63.9% | 46.4% |
| 1968 | 63.5% | 43.1% |
| 1967 | 63% | 39.8% |
| 1966 | 62.5% | 36.7% |
| 1965 | 62% | 33.7% |
| 1964 | 61.5% | 30.9% |
| 1963 | 61% | 30% |
| 1962 | 60.6% | 29.1% |
| 1961 | 60.1% | 28.2% |
| 1960 | 59.5% | 27.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.7% to 74.7% in the Czech Republic and from 76.9% to 81.9% in Libya.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Prague | 1.4M |
| Brno | 403K |
| Liberec | 108K |
| Zlin | 74.7K |
| Most | 63.5K |
| Opava | 55.1K |
| Jihlava | 54.6K |
| Frydek-Mistek | 53.6K |
| Teplice | 50.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons