Iceland has a population density of 10.4 people per square mile compared to 1,264 people in India. Iceland has 2,740,233 sq ft of land per person vs 24,387 sq ft in India. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Iceland and India are ranked 192nd and 19th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Iceland has 0.005% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 17.8% of the population and 2% of the land area for India, hence the population density in Iceland is 99.2% lower than in India.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 10.4 ppl/mi² | 1,264 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 192/197 | 19/197 |
| Population |
412970
|
1474115403
|
| Land area | 38,931 sq mi | 1,147,955 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,682,398 sq ft | 22,057 sq ft |
| Rural population | 5.91% | 63.1% |
| Urban population | 94.1% | 36.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 10.7% |
Iceland vs India:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Iceland increased by 37.7%, compared to a 27.7% growth in India.
In 2004, Iceland ranked 188th for population density and is in 192nd place now. India was 17th in 2004 and ranks 19th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 10.4 | 1,264 |
| 2023 | 10.1 | 1,253 |
| 2022 | 9.81 | 1,242 |
| 2021 | 9.57 | 1,232 |
| 2020 | 9.41 | 1,222 |
| 2019 | 9.26 | 1,210 |
| 2018 | 9.06 | 1,197 |
| 2017 | 8.87 | 1,184 |
| 2016 | 8.67 | 1,171 |
| 2015 | 8.55 | 1,157 |
| 2014 | 8.46 | 1,143 |
| 2013 | 8.36 | 1,129 |
| 2012 | 8.29 | 1,114 |
| 2011 | 8.24 | 1,099 |
| 2010 | 8.22 | 1,083 |
| 2009 | 8.23 | 1,068 |
| 2008 | 8.2 | 1,052 |
| 2007 | 8.05 | 1,037 |
| 2006 | 7.85 | 1,022 |
| 2005 | 7.67 | 1,006 |
| 2004 | 7.55 | 990 |
| 2003 | 7.48 | 973 |
| 2002 | 7.43 | 956 |
| 2001 | 7.36 | 939 |
| 2000 | 7.27 | 922 |
| 1999 | 7.17 | 904 |
| 1998 | 7.08 | 887 |
| 1997 | 7 | 870 |
| 1996 | 6.95 | 853 |
| 1995 | 6.91 | 837 |
| 1994 | 6.87 | 820 |
| 1993 | 6.81 | 803 |
| 1992 | 6.74 | 787 |
| 1991 | 6.66 | 770 |
| 1990 | 6.58 | 753 |
| 1989 | 6.53 | 737 |
| 1988 | 6.45 | 721 |
| 1987 | 6.35 | 705 |
| 1986 | 6.28 | 689 |
| 1985 | 6.24 | 673 |
| 1984 | 6.19 | 658 |
| 1983 | 6.12 | 642 |
| 1982 | 6.04 | 627 |
| 1981 | 5.96 | 613 |
| 1980 | 5.89 | 599 |
| 1979 | 5.83 | 585 |
| 1978 | 5.78 | 571 |
| 1977 | 5.73 | 558 |
| 1976 | 5.69 | 545 |
| 1975 | 5.63 | 533 |
| 1974 | 5.56 | 520 |
| 1973 | 5.49 | 508 |
| 1972 | 5.4 | 497 |
| 1971 | 5.32 | 486 |
| 1970 | 5.28 | 476 |
| 1969 | 5.25 | 465 |
| 1968 | 5.21 | 455 |
| 1967 | 5.13 | 446 |
| 1966 | 5.05 | 436 |
| 1965 | 4.97 | 427 |
| 1964 | 4.88 | 417 |
| 1963 | 4.8 | 408 |
| 1962 | 4.71 | 398 |
| 1961 | 4.63 | 389 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 94.1% | 36.9% |
| 2023 | 94% | 36.4% |
| 2022 | 94% | 35.9% |
| 2021 | 93.9% | 35.4% |
| 2020 | 93.9% | 34.9% |
| 2019 | 93.9% | 34.5% |
| 2018 | 93.8% | 34% |
| 2017 | 93.8% | 33.6% |
| 2016 | 93.7% | 33.2% |
| 2015 | 93.7% | 32.8% |
| 2014 | 93.7% | 32.4% |
| 2013 | 93.6% | 32% |
| 2012 | 93.6% | 31.6% |
| 2011 | 93.6% | 31.3% |
| 2010 | 93.6% | 30.9% |
| 2009 | 93.5% | 30.6% |
| 2008 | 93.4% | 30.2% |
| 2007 | 93.3% | 29.9% |
| 2006 | 93.2% | 29.6% |
| 2005 | 93% | 29.2% |
| 2004 | 92.9% | 28.9% |
| 2003 | 92.8% | 28.6% |
| 2002 | 92.7% | 28.2% |
| 2001 | 92.5% | 27.9% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 27.7% |
| 1999 | 92.3% | 27.5% |
| 1998 | 92.1% | 27.2% |
| 1997 | 92% | 27% |
| 1996 | 91.8% | 26.8% |
| 1995 | 91.6% | 26.6% |
| 1994 | 91.5% | 26.4% |
| 1993 | 91.3% | 26.2% |
| 1992 | 91.1% | 26% |
| 1991 | 90.9% | 25.8% |
| 1990 | 90.8% | 25.5% |
| 1989 | 90.5% | 25.3% |
| 1988 | 90.3% | 25.1% |
| 1987 | 90.1% | 24.8% |
| 1986 | 89.8% | 24.6% |
| 1985 | 89.6% | 24.3% |
| 1984 | 89.3% | 24.1% |
| 1983 | 89.1% | 23.9% |
| 1982 | 88.8% | 23.6% |
| 1981 | 88.5% | 23.4% |
| 1980 | 88.3% | 23.1% |
| 1979 | 88% | 22.7% |
| 1978 | 87.6% | 22.4% |
| 1977 | 87.3% | 22% |
| 1976 | 87% | 21.7% |
| 1975 | 86.7% | 21.3% |
| 1974 | 86.3% | 21% |
| 1973 | 86% | 20.7% |
| 1972 | 85.6% | 20.3% |
| 1971 | 85.3% | 20% |
| 1970 | 84.9% | 19.8% |
| 1969 | 84.5% | 19.6% |
| 1968 | 84.1% | 19.4% |
| 1967 | 83.6% | 19.2% |
| 1966 | 83.2% | 19% |
| 1965 | 82.7% | 18.8% |
| 1964 | 82.3% | 18.6% |
| 1963 | 81.8% | 18.4% |
| 1962 | 81.3% | 18.2% |
| 1961 | 80.8% | 18% |
| 1960 | 80.3% | 17.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland and from 28.9% to 36.9% in India.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons