Demographics of Brazil compared to Serbia:
- As of 2025, the population of Brazil is 213M vs 6.54M in Serbia - 32.6 times difference.
- The median age in Brazil is 35.4 years compared to 45.1 years in Serbia.
- Brazil is ranked 73/196 by median age (oldest to youngest) vs 15/196 for Serbia.
- The average life expectancy at birth in Brazil is 76.2 years, compared to 77.1 years in Serbia.
- The share of old-age demographic (65+) in Brazil is 11% vs 22.7% in Serbia.
- The share of young demographic (0-15 years old) in Brazil is 19.7% vs 14.3% in Serbia.
- Brazil has 148M working age adults (aged 15-64) vs 4.12M in Serbia.
- The average number of children born to each woman is 1.62 in Brazil compared to 1.61 in Serbia.
Demographic data comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population |
213415080
|
6541064
|
| Median age | 35.4 years | 45.1 years |
| Median age rank | 73/196 | 15/196 |
| Average age | 36.3 years | 44 years |
| Average age rank | 75/196 | 15/196 |
| Age dependency ratio | 44.3% | 58.7% |
| Young-age dependency ratio | 28.4% | 22.7% |
| Old-age dependency ratio | 15.9% | 36% |
| Male:Female ratio | 49.2:50.8 | 47.4:52.6 |
| Population density | 25.4 ppl/mi² | 78.3 ppl/mi² |
| Fertility rate | 1.62 | 1.61 |
| Life expectancy | 76.2 years | 77.1 years |
Median age history and projection chart in
Brazil vs Serbia
| Year | Median age | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 18 | 28.7 |
| 1961 | 17.9 | 29.1 |
| 1962 | 17.9 | 29.4 |
| 1963 | 17.8 | 29.8 |
| 1964 | 17.8 | 30.2 |
| 1965 | 17.9 | 30.5 |
| 1966 | 17.9 | 30.8 |
| 1967 | 18 | 31.1 |
| 1968 | 18.1 | 31.4 |
| 1969 | 18.2 | 31.7 |
| 1970 | 18.4 | 32 |
| 1971 | 18.5 | 32.2 |
| 1972 | 18.7 | 32.5 |
| 1973 | 18.9 | 32.7 |
| 1974 | 19.1 | 32.8 |
| 1975 | 19.2 | 33 |
| 1976 | 19.4 | 33.2 |
| 1977 | 19.6 | 33.4 |
| 1978 | 19.8 | 33.5 |
| 1979 | 20 | 33.7 |
| 1980 | 20.2 | 33.8 |
| 1981 | 20.4 | 33.9 |
| 1982 | 20.6 | 34.1 |
| 1983 | 20.8 | 34.4 |
| 1984 | 21 | 34.7 |
| 1985 | 21.2 | 35 |
| 1986 | 21.5 | 35.4 |
| 1987 | 21.7 | 35.7 |
| 1988 | 21.9 | 36.1 |
| 1989 | 22.1 | 36.5 |
| 1990 | 22.4 | 36.8 |
| 1991 | 22.7 | 37.1 |
| 1992 | 22.9 | 37.5 |
| 1993 | 23.2 | 37.8 |
| 1994 | 23.5 | 38.2 |
| 1995 | 23.7 | 38.5 |
| 1996 | 24 | 38.9 |
| 1997 | 24.3 | 39.2 |
| 1998 | 24.6 | 39.5 |
| 1999 | 24.9 | 39.8 |
| 2000 | 25.2 | 40.1 |
| 2001 | 25.5 | 40.3 |
| 2002 | 25.9 | 40.5 |
| 2003 | 26.3 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 26.7 | 40.9 |
| 2005 | 27.1 | 41.1 |
| 2006 | 27.5 | 41.3 |
| 2007 | 27.9 | 41.5 |
| 2008 | 28.3 | 41.7 |
| 2009 | 28.8 | 41.9 |
| 2010 | 29.2 | 42.1 |
| 2011 | 29.7 | 42.4 |
| 2012 | 30.1 | 42.6 |
| 2013 | 30.6 | 42.8 |
| 2014 | 31 | 43 |
| 2015 | 31.5 | 43.3 |
| 2016 | 31.9 | 43.5 |
| 2017 | 32.4 | 43.7 |
| 2018 | 32.8 | 44 |
| 2019 | 33.2 | 44.2 |
| 2020 | 33.7 | 44.4 |
| 2021 | 34.1 | 44.5 |
| 2022 | 34.5 | 44.7 |
| 2023 | 34.9 | 44.9 |
| 2024 | 35.4 | 45.1 |
| 2025 | 35.8 | 45.4 |
| 2026 | 36.2 | 45.7 |
| 2027 | 36.7 | 45.9 |
| 2028 | 37.1 | 46.1 |
| 2029 | 37.5 | 46.4 |
| 2030 | 37.9 | 46.6 |
| 2031 | 38.3 | 46.9 |
| 2032 | 38.7 | 47.1 |
| 2033 | 39.1 | 47.3 |
| 2034 | 39.5 | 47.5 |
| 2035 | 39.9 | 47.7 |
| 2036 | 40.3 | 47.9 |
| 2037 | 40.6 | 48.1 |
| 2038 | 41 | 48.2 |
| 2039 | 41.4 | 48.3 |
| 2040 | 41.8 | 48.5 |
| 2041 | 42.1 | 48.6 |
| 2042 | 42.5 | 48.7 |
| 2043 | 42.8 | 48.9 |
| 2044 | 43.1 | 49 |
| 2045 | 43.5 | 49.1 |
| 2046 | 43.8 | 49.2 |
| 2047 | 44.1 | 49.3 |
| 2048 | 44.3 | 49.3 |
| 2049 | 44.6 | 49.3 |
| 2050 | 44.9 | 49.4 |
In 1960, the median age in Brazil was 18 years compared to 28.7 years in Serbia. As of 2024, the median age had increased to 35.4 years in Brazil and to 45.1 years in Serbia.
According to United Nations projections, the median age in Brazil is expected to increased to around 44.9 years by 2050 compared to 49.4 years in Serbia. The aging demographics forecast is based on previous years' birth rates and increasing life expectancy.
Demographic pyramid: age and gender distribution
| Age range | Share of population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 0-4 | 3.15% | 3.03% | 2.34% | 2.24% |
| 5-9 | 3.42% | 3.28% | 2.44% | 2.41% |
| 10-14 | 3.46% | 3.33% | 2.45% | 2.43% |
| 15-19 | 3.57% | 3.44% | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| 20-24 | 3.76% | 3.66% | 2.61% | 2.63% |
| 25-29 | 3.89% | 3.84% | 2.78% | 2.77% |
| 30-34 | 3.8% | 3.79% | 3% | 3.03% |
| 35-39 | 3.91% | 3.95% | 3.27% | 3.34% |
| 40-44 | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.5% | 3.6% |
| 45-49 | 3.43% | 3.58% | 3.55% | 3.68% |
| 50-54 | 3% | 3.18% | 3.31% | 3.52% |
| 55-59 | 2.7% | 2.92% | 3.15% | 3.48% |
| 60-64 | 2.4% | 2.67% | 3.15% | 3.66% |
| 65-69 | 1.88% | 2.19% | 3.16% | 3.86% |
| 70-74 | 1.36% | 1.68% | 2.94% | 3.85% |
| 75-79 | 0.85% | 1.13% | 1.71% | 2.51% |
| 80+ | 0.77% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 3.05% |
The chart above is a variation of a population pyramid and represents a comparison of age and gender structure. Brazil has low demographic potential with 49.4% of people in the 0-34 age group compared to 36.1% and low potential in Serbia.
Age dependency chart
| Year | Age dependency ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total | Young | Old | Total | Young | Old | |
| 1960 | 87.7% | 82.9% | 4.74% | 51% | 41.1% | 9.9% |
| 1961 | 88.3% | 83.5% | 4.82% | 51.1% | 41% | 10.1% |
| 1962 | 88.8% | 83.9% | 4.9% | 51% | 40.7% | 10.3% |
| 1963 | 89% | 84% | 4.98% | 50.7% | 40.2% | 10.5% |
| 1964 | 88.9% | 83.9% | 5.05% | 50.3% | 39.5% | 10.8% |
| 1965 | 88.5% | 83.4% | 5.12% | 49.8% | 38.7% | 11.1% |
| 1966 | 87.9% | 82.7% | 5.19% | 49.2% | 37.7% | 11.5% |
| 1967 | 87.1% | 81.9% | 5.25% | 48.6% | 36.7% | 11.9% |
| 1968 | 86.1% | 80.8% | 5.31% | 47.8% | 35.6% | 12.2% |
| 1969 | 85% | 79.7% | 5.38% | 47% | 34.5% | 12.5% |
| 1970 | 83.9% | 78.4% | 5.44% | 46.4% | 33.6% | 12.8% |
| 1971 | 82.6% | 77.1% | 5.5% | 45.9% | 32.9% | 13.1% |
| 1972 | 81.4% | 75.8% | 5.56% | 45.8% | 32.4% | 13.4% |
| 1973 | 80.1% | 74.5% | 5.63% | 45.7% | 32% | 13.7% |
| 1974 | 78.9% | 73.2% | 5.69% | 45.7% | 31.7% | 14% |
| 1975 | 77.6% | 71.8% | 5.76% | 45.8% | 31.3% | 14.4% |
| 1976 | 76.4% | 70.6% | 5.83% | 45.8% | 31% | 14.8% |
| 1977 | 75.2% | 69.3% | 5.89% | 45.8% | 30.7% | 15.1% |
| 1978 | 74.1% | 68.2% | 5.95% | 45.7% | 30.4% | 15.3% |
| 1979 | 73.1% | 67.1% | 6.01% | 45.5% | 30.2% | 15.3% |
| 1980 | 72.2% | 66.2% | 6.06% | 45% | 29.9% | 15.1% |
| 1981 | 71.5% | 65.4% | 6.11% | 44.5% | 29.7% | 14.7% |
| 1982 | 70.9% | 64.7% | 6.16% | 43.8% | 29.6% | 14.2% |
| 1983 | 70.4% | 64.2% | 6.22% | 43.2% | 29.4% | 13.8% |
| 1984 | 69.9% | 63.6% | 6.28% | 42.9% | 29.2% | 13.7% |
| 1985 | 69.3% | 63% | 6.34% | 42.9% | 29.1% | 13.8% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 62.3% | 6.42% | 43% | 28.9% | 14.1% |
| 1987 | 68.1% | 61.6% | 6.5% | 43.3% | 28.7% | 14.6% |
| 1988 | 67.3% | 60.7% | 6.6% | 43.5% | 28.4% | 15.1% |
| 1989 | 66.5% | 59.8% | 6.71% | 43.8% | 28.2% | 15.7% |
| 1990 | 65.6% | 58.8% | 6.82% | 44.1% | 27.8% | 16.3% |
| 1991 | 64.6% | 57.6% | 6.94% | 44.5% | 27.5% | 16.9% |
| 1992 | 63.5% | 56.4% | 7.05% | 44.9% | 27.3% | 17.7% |
| 1993 | 62.3% | 55.1% | 7.17% | 45.4% | 27% | 18.5% |
| 1994 | 61.1% | 53.8% | 7.28% | 45.9% | 26.7% | 19.3% |
| 1995 | 59.9% | 52.5% | 7.4% | 46.4% | 26.3% | 20.1% |
| 1996 | 58.6% | 51.1% | 7.52% | 46.9% | 26% | 20.9% |
| 1997 | 57.4% | 49.8% | 7.63% | 47.3% | 25.6% | 21.7% |
| 1998 | 56.2% | 48.5% | 7.74% | 47.7% | 25.2% | 22.5% |
| 1999 | 55.1% | 47.2% | 7.84% | 47.9% | 24.7% | 23.2% |
| 2000 | 53.9% | 46% | 7.93% | 48.1% | 24.3% | 23.8% |
| 2001 | 52.8% | 44.8% | 8.04% | 48.2% | 23.8% | 24.3% |
| 2002 | 51.8% | 43.6% | 8.15% | 48.2% | 23.4% | 24.8% |
| 2003 | 50.8% | 42.5% | 8.28% | 48.3% | 23.1% | 25.2% |
| 2004 | 49.8% | 41.4% | 8.44% | 48.3% | 22.8% | 25.5% |
| 2005 | 49% | 40.4% | 8.61% | 48.2% | 22.5% | 25.7% |
| 2006 | 48.3% | 39.5% | 8.79% | 48% | 22.2% | 25.8% |
| 2007 | 47.6% | 38.6% | 9% | 47.8% | 22% | 25.8% |
| 2008 | 46.9% | 37.7% | 9.22% | 47.4% | 21.7% | 25.7% |
| 2009 | 46.3% | 36.8% | 9.46% | 47% | 21.4% | 25.6% |
| 2010 | 45.7% | 36% | 9.71% | 46.7% | 21.2% | 25.5% |
| 2011 | 45.2% | 35.2% | 9.99% | 46.5% | 21% | 25.5% |
| 2012 | 44.6% | 34.4% | 10.3% | 46.8% | 21% | 25.8% |
| 2013 | 44.2% | 33.5% | 10.6% | 47.6% | 21.1% | 26.5% |
| 2014 | 43.8% | 32.8% | 11% | 48.6% | 21.3% | 27.3% |
| 2015 | 43.6% | 32.2% | 11.4% | 49.8% | 21.5% | 28.3% |
| 2016 | 43.4% | 31.6% | 11.9% | 50.9% | 21.6% | 29.2% |
| 2017 | 43.4% | 31.1% | 12.3% | 52% | 21.7% | 30.3% |
| 2018 | 43.4% | 30.6% | 12.8% | 53.3% | 21.9% | 31.4% |
| 2019 | 43.5% | 30.2% | 13.3% | 54.6% | 22% | 32.6% |
| 2020 | 43.6% | 29.8% | 13.8% | 55.8% | 22.2% | 33.6% |
| 2021 | 43.6% | 29.4% | 14.2% | 56.7% | 22.4% | 34.3% |
| 2022 | 43.8% | 29% | 14.7% | 57.3% | 22.6% | 34.7% |
| 2023 | 44% | 28.7% | 15.3% | 57.9% | 22.7% | 35.3% |
| 2024 | 44.3% | 28.4% | 15.9% | 58.7% | 22.7% | 36% |
Age dependency is the ratio of people not in the labor force (children under 15 and adults 64+) to people aged 15 to 64.
Age dependency in Brazil decreased from 49.8% to 44.3% between 2004 and 2024.
In Serbia, the ratio of dependent people increased from 48.3% to 58.7% between 2004 and 2024 with a decreased share of young people and an increased proportion of people aged 65+.
Working age demographic
| Year | Working age population share | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 53.3% | 66.2% |
| 1961 | 53.1% | 66.2% |
| 1962 | 53% | 66.2% |
| 1963 | 52.9% | 66.4% |
| 1964 | 52.9% | 66.5% |
| 1965 | 53% | 66.8% |
| 1966 | 53.2% | 67% |
| 1967 | 53.4% | 67.3% |
| 1968 | 53.7% | 67.7% |
| 1969 | 54% | 68% |
| 1970 | 54.4% | 68.3% |
| 1971 | 54.8% | 68.5% |
| 1972 | 55.1% | 68.6% |
| 1973 | 55.5% | 68.6% |
| 1974 | 55.9% | 68.6% |
| 1975 | 56.3% | 68.6% |
| 1976 | 56.7% | 68.6% |
| 1977 | 57.1% | 68.6% |
| 1978 | 57.4% | 68.6% |
| 1979 | 57.8% | 68.7% |
| 1980 | 58.1% | 68.9% |
| 1981 | 58.3% | 69.2% |
| 1982 | 58.5% | 69.5% |
| 1983 | 58.7% | 69.8% |
| 1984 | 58.9% | 70% |
| 1985 | 59.1% | 70% |
| 1986 | 59.3% | 69.9% |
| 1987 | 59.5% | 69.8% |
| 1988 | 59.8% | 69.7% |
| 1989 | 60.1% | 69.5% |
| 1990 | 60.4% | 69.4% |
| 1991 | 60.8% | 69.2% |
| 1992 | 61.2% | 69% |
| 1993 | 61.6% | 68.8% |
| 1994 | 62.1% | 68.5% |
| 1995 | 62.6% | 68.3% |
| 1996 | 63% | 68.1% |
| 1997 | 63.5% | 67.9% |
| 1998 | 64% | 67.7% |
| 1999 | 64.5% | 67.6% |
| 2000 | 65% | 67.5% |
| 2001 | 65.4% | 67.5% |
| 2002 | 65.9% | 67.5% |
| 2003 | 66.3% | 67.4% |
| 2004 | 66.7% | 67.4% |
| 2005 | 67.1% | 67.5% |
| 2006 | 67.4% | 67.6% |
| 2007 | 67.8% | 67.7% |
| 2008 | 68.1% | 67.8% |
| 2009 | 68.3% | 68% |
| 2010 | 68.6% | 68.2% |
| 2011 | 68.9% | 68.2% |
| 2012 | 69.1% | 68.1% |
| 2013 | 69.4% | 67.7% |
| 2014 | 69.5% | 67.3% |
| 2015 | 69.6% | 66.8% |
| 2016 | 69.7% | 66.3% |
| 2017 | 69.7% | 65.8% |
| 2018 | 69.7% | 65.2% |
| 2019 | 69.7% | 64.7% |
| 2020 | 69.6% | 64.2% |
| 2021 | 69.6% | 63.8% |
| 2022 | 69.5% | 63.6% |
| 2023 | 69.4% | 63.3% |
| 2024 | 69.3% | 63% |
| 2025 | 69.1% | 62.7% |
| 2026 | 69% | 62.4% |
| 2027 | 68.8% | 62.2% |
| 2028 | 68.6% | 62% |
| 2029 | 68.5% | 61.9% |
| 2030 | 68.4% | 61.8% |
| 2031 | 68.2% | 61.7% |
| 2032 | 68.1% | 61.6% |
| 2033 | 68% | 61.5% |
| 2034 | 67.8% | 61.5% |
| 2035 | 67.7% | 61.4% |
| 2036 | 67.5% | 61.3% |
| 2037 | 67.3% | 61.2% |
| 2038 | 67% | 61.1% |
| 2039 | 66.8% | 60.9% |
| 2040 | 66.5% | 60.7% |
| 2041 | 66.2% | 60.4% |
| 2042 | 65.9% | 60.2% |
| 2043 | 65.6% | 59.9% |
| 2044 | 65.2% | 59.6% |
| 2045 | 64.8% | 59.3% |
| 2046 | 64.4% | 59% |
| 2047 | 64% | 58.8% |
| 2048 | 63.6% | 58.5% |
| 2049 | 63.2% | 58.1% |
| 2050 | 62.8% | 57.8% |
Between 2004 and 2024, the share of working-age demographics aged 15-64 changed from 66.7% to 69.3% in Brazil and from 67.4% to 63% in Serbia.
Share of young demographic (0-14 years old)
| Year | Share of people 0-14 years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 44.2% | 27.2% |
| 1961 | 44.3% | 27.1% |
| 1962 | 44.4% | 27% |
| 1963 | 44.5% | 26.7% |
| 1964 | 44.4% | 26.3% |
| 1965 | 44.2% | 25.8% |
| 1966 | 44% | 25.3% |
| 1967 | 43.8% | 24.7% |
| 1968 | 43.4% | 24.1% |
| 1969 | 43% | 23.5% |
| 1970 | 42.7% | 23% |
| 1971 | 42.2% | 22.5% |
| 1972 | 41.8% | 22.2% |
| 1973 | 41.4% | 22% |
| 1974 | 40.9% | 21.7% |
| 1975 | 40.5% | 21.5% |
| 1976 | 40% | 21.3% |
| 1977 | 39.6% | 21% |
| 1978 | 39.1% | 20.9% |
| 1979 | 38.8% | 20.7% |
| 1980 | 38.4% | 20.6% |
| 1981 | 38.1% | 20.6% |
| 1982 | 37.9% | 20.6% |
| 1983 | 37.7% | 20.5% |
| 1984 | 37.4% | 20.5% |
| 1985 | 37.2% | 20.3% |
| 1986 | 36.9% | 20.2% |
| 1987 | 36.6% | 20% |
| 1988 | 36.3% | 19.8% |
| 1989 | 35.9% | 19.6% |
| 1990 | 35.5% | 19.3% |
| 1991 | 35% | 19.1% |
| 1992 | 34.5% | 18.8% |
| 1993 | 34% | 18.6% |
| 1994 | 33.4% | 18.3% |
| 1995 | 32.8% | 18% |
| 1996 | 32.2% | 17.7% |
| 1997 | 31.6% | 17.4% |
| 1998 | 31% | 17.1% |
| 1999 | 30.5% | 16.7% |
| 2000 | 29.9% | 16.4% |
| 2001 | 29.3% | 16.1% |
| 2002 | 28.7% | 15.8% |
| 2003 | 28.2% | 15.6% |
| 2004 | 27.6% | 15.4% |
| 2005 | 27.1% | 15.2% |
| 2006 | 26.6% | 15% |
| 2007 | 26.1% | 14.9% |
| 2008 | 25.7% | 14.7% |
| 2009 | 25.2% | 14.6% |
| 2010 | 24.7% | 14.5% |
| 2011 | 24.2% | 14.4% |
| 2012 | 23.7% | 14.3% |
| 2013 | 23.3% | 14.3% |
| 2014 | 22.8% | 14.3% |
| 2015 | 22.4% | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 22% | 14.3% |
| 2017 | 21.7% | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 21.4% | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 21.1% | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 20.8% | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 20.5% | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 20.2% | 14.4% |
| 2023 | 19.9% | 14.4% |
| 2024 | 19.7% | 14.3% |
| 2025 | 19.4% | 14.3% |
| 2026 | 19.1% | 14.2% |
| 2027 | 18.8% | 14.1% |
| 2028 | 18.5% | 14.1% |
| 2029 | 18.2% | 14% |
| 2030 | 17.9% | 13.9% |
| 2031 | 17.7% | 13.8% |
| 2032 | 17.4% | 13.7% |
| 2033 | 17.1% | 13.6% |
| 2034 | 16.9% | 13.5% |
| 2035 | 16.6% | 13.4% |
| 2036 | 16.4% | 13.3% |
| 2037 | 16.2% | 13.3% |
| 2038 | 16.1% | 13.2% |
| 2039 | 15.9% | 13.2% |
| 2040 | 15.8% | 13.1% |
| 2041 | 15.6% | 13.1% |
| 2042 | 15.5% | 13.1% |
| 2043 | 15.4% | 13.1% |
| 2044 | 15.3% | 13.1% |
| 2045 | 15.2% | 13.1% |
| 2046 | 15.1% | 13.1% |
| 2047 | 15% | 13.1% |
| 2048 | 14.9% | 13.1% |
| 2049 | 14.8% | 13.1% |
| 2050 | 14.6% | 13.1% |
The share of young people aged below 15 is 19.7% in Brazil and 14.3% in Serbia. Birth rates in Brazil compared to Serbia .
Share of old population (65+)
| Year | Share of population 65+ years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 2.53% | 6.55% |
| 1961 | 2.56% | 6.67% |
| 1962 | 2.59% | 6.8% |
| 1963 | 2.63% | 6.95% |
| 1964 | 2.67% | 7.16% |
| 1965 | 2.71% | 7.43% |
| 1966 | 2.76% | 7.71% |
| 1967 | 2.81% | 8% |
| 1968 | 2.85% | 8.26% |
| 1969 | 2.91% | 8.5% |
| 1970 | 2.96% | 8.73% |
| 1971 | 3.01% | 8.94% |
| 1972 | 3.07% | 9.16% |
| 1973 | 3.12% | 9.39% |
| 1974 | 3.18% | 9.63% |
| 1975 | 3.24% | 9.9% |
| 1976 | 3.3% | 10.2% |
| 1977 | 3.36% | 10.4% |
| 1978 | 3.42% | 10.5% |
| 1979 | 3.47% | 10.5% |
| 1980 | 3.52% | 10.4% |
| 1981 | 3.56% | 10.2% |
| 1982 | 3.61% | 9.89% |
| 1983 | 3.65% | 9.65% |
| 1984 | 3.69% | 9.56% |
| 1985 | 3.74% | 9.66% |
| 1986 | 3.8% | 9.89% |
| 1987 | 3.87% | 10.2% |
| 1988 | 3.95% | 10.5% |
| 1989 | 4.03% | 10.9% |
| 1990 | 4.12% | 11.3% |
| 1991 | 4.21% | 11.7% |
| 1992 | 4.31% | 12.2% |
| 1993 | 4.42% | 12.7% |
| 1994 | 4.52% | 13.2% |
| 1995 | 4.63% | 13.7% |
| 1996 | 4.74% | 14.2% |
| 1997 | 4.85% | 14.7% |
| 1998 | 4.95% | 15.2% |
| 1999 | 5.05% | 15.7% |
| 2000 | 5.15% | 16.1% |
| 2001 | 5.26% | 16.4% |
| 2002 | 5.37% | 16.7% |
| 2003 | 5.49% | 17% |
| 2004 | 5.63% | 17.2% |
| 2005 | 5.78% | 17.3% |
| 2006 | 5.93% | 17.4% |
| 2007 | 6.1% | 17.5% |
| 2008 | 6.27% | 17.4% |
| 2009 | 6.46% | 17.4% |
| 2010 | 6.67% | 17.4% |
| 2011 | 6.88% | 17.4% |
| 2012 | 7.11% | 17.6% |
| 2013 | 7.37% | 18% |
| 2014 | 7.65% | 18.4% |
| 2015 | 7.96% | 18.9% |
| 2016 | 8.27% | 19.4% |
| 2017 | 8.59% | 19.9% |
| 2018 | 8.93% | 20.5% |
| 2019 | 9.27% | 21.1% |
| 2020 | 9.6% | 21.6% |
| 2021 | 9.91% | 21.9% |
| 2022 | 10.3% | 22.1% |
| 2023 | 10.6% | 22.3% |
| 2024 | 11% | 22.7% |
| 2025 | 11.5% | 23.1% |
| 2026 | 11.9% | 23.4% |
| 2027 | 12.4% | 23.7% |
| 2028 | 12.8% | 23.9% |
| 2029 | 13.3% | 24.1% |
| 2030 | 13.7% | 24.3% |
| 2031 | 14.1% | 24.5% |
| 2032 | 14.5% | 24.7% |
| 2033 | 14.9% | 24.8% |
| 2034 | 15.3% | 25% |
| 2035 | 15.7% | 25.2% |
| 2036 | 16.1% | 25.3% |
| 2037 | 16.5% | 25.5% |
| 2038 | 16.9% | 25.7% |
| 2039 | 17.3% | 25.9% |
| 2040 | 17.7% | 26.2% |
| 2041 | 18.1% | 26.5% |
| 2042 | 18.6% | 26.8% |
| 2043 | 19% | 27% |
| 2044 | 19.5% | 27.3% |
| 2045 | 20% | 27.6% |
| 2046 | 20.5% | 27.9% |
| 2047 | 21% | 28.2% |
| 2048 | 21.5% | 28.5% |
| 2049 | 22% | 28.8% |
| 2050 | 22.5% | 29.1% |
The share of older people aged 65 and over is 11% in Brazil and 22.7% in Serbia. Life expectancy in Brazil compared to Serbia .
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Demographics by nationality or race
Religion demographics in Brazil vs Serbia
Median age map
Median age
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Demographics comparisons