Demographics of Brazil compared to New Zealand:
- As of 2025, the population of Brazil is 213M vs 5.41M in New Zealand - 39.5 times difference.
- The median age in Brazil is 35.4 years compared to 38.6 years in New Zealand.
- Brazil is ranked 73/196 by median age (oldest to youngest) vs 56/196 for New Zealand.
- The average life expectancy at birth in Brazil is 76.2 years, compared to 82.4 years in New Zealand.
- The share of old-age demographic (65+) in Brazil is 11% vs 17.2% in New Zealand.
- The share of young demographic (0-15 years old) in Brazil is 19.7% vs 18.1% in New Zealand.
- Brazil has 148M working age adults (aged 15-64) vs 3.5M in New Zealand.
- The average number of children born to each woman is 1.62 in Brazil compared to 1.56 in New Zealand.
Demographic data comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population |
213415080
|
5406623
|
| Median age | 35.4 years | 38.6 years |
| Median age rank | 73/196 | 56/196 |
| Average age | 36.3 years | 39.8 years |
| Average age rank | 75/196 | 53/196 |
| Age dependency ratio | 44.3% | 54.6% |
| Young-age dependency ratio | 28.4% | 28% |
| Old-age dependency ratio | 15.9% | 26.6% |
| Male:Female ratio | 49.2:50.8 | 49.7:50.3 |
| Population density | 25.4 ppl/mi² | 20.3 ppl/mi² |
| Fertility rate | 1.62 | 1.56 |
| Life expectancy | 76.2 years | 82.4 years |
Median age history and projection chart in
Brazil vs New Zealand
| Year | Median age | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 18 | 27.5 |
| 1961 | 17.9 | 27.1 |
| 1962 | 17.9 | 26.8 |
| 1963 | 17.8 | 26.4 |
| 1964 | 17.8 | 26.2 |
| 1965 | 17.9 | 26 |
| 1966 | 17.9 | 25.9 |
| 1967 | 18 | 25.8 |
| 1968 | 18.1 | 25.7 |
| 1969 | 18.2 | 25.7 |
| 1970 | 18.4 | 25.6 |
| 1971 | 18.5 | 25.7 |
| 1972 | 18.7 | 25.9 |
| 1973 | 18.9 | 26 |
| 1974 | 19.1 | 26.2 |
| 1975 | 19.2 | 26.3 |
| 1976 | 19.4 | 26.5 |
| 1977 | 19.6 | 26.8 |
| 1978 | 19.8 | 27.1 |
| 1979 | 20 | 27.5 |
| 1980 | 20.2 | 27.9 |
| 1981 | 20.4 | 28.2 |
| 1982 | 20.6 | 28.5 |
| 1983 | 20.8 | 28.8 |
| 1984 | 21 | 29.1 |
| 1985 | 21.2 | 29.4 |
| 1986 | 21.5 | 29.8 |
| 1987 | 21.7 | 30.1 |
| 1988 | 21.9 | 30.4 |
| 1989 | 22.1 | 30.8 |
| 1990 | 22.4 | 31.1 |
| 1991 | 22.7 | 31.4 |
| 1992 | 22.9 | 31.7 |
| 1993 | 23.2 | 32 |
| 1994 | 23.5 | 32.3 |
| 1995 | 23.7 | 32.6 |
| 1996 | 24 | 32.8 |
| 1997 | 24.3 | 33.2 |
| 1998 | 24.6 | 33.6 |
| 1999 | 24.9 | 34 |
| 2000 | 25.2 | 34.3 |
| 2001 | 25.5 | 34.6 |
| 2002 | 25.9 | 34.8 |
| 2003 | 26.3 | 35 |
| 2004 | 26.7 | 35.2 |
| 2005 | 27.1 | 35.5 |
| 2006 | 27.5 | 35.8 |
| 2007 | 27.9 | 36.1 |
| 2008 | 28.3 | 36.4 |
| 2009 | 28.8 | 36.6 |
| 2010 | 29.2 | 36.8 |
| 2011 | 29.7 | 37 |
| 2012 | 30.1 | 37.2 |
| 2013 | 30.6 | 37.4 |
| 2014 | 31 | 37.5 |
| 2015 | 31.5 | 37.4 |
| 2016 | 31.9 | 37.3 |
| 2017 | 32.4 | 37.2 |
| 2018 | 32.8 | 37.3 |
| 2019 | 33.2 | 37.3 |
| 2020 | 33.7 | 37.5 |
| 2021 | 34.1 | 37.8 |
| 2022 | 34.5 | 38.1 |
| 2023 | 34.9 | 38.3 |
| 2024 | 35.4 | 38.6 |
| 2025 | 35.8 | 38.7 |
| 2026 | 36.2 | 39 |
| 2027 | 36.7 | 39.3 |
| 2028 | 37.1 | 39.6 |
| 2029 | 37.5 | 39.9 |
| 2030 | 37.9 | 40.2 |
| 2031 | 38.3 | 40.5 |
| 2032 | 38.7 | 40.8 |
| 2033 | 39.1 | 41.1 |
| 2034 | 39.5 | 41.4 |
| 2035 | 39.9 | 41.7 |
| 2036 | 40.3 | 41.9 |
| 2037 | 40.6 | 42.1 |
| 2038 | 41 | 42.3 |
| 2039 | 41.4 | 42.5 |
| 2040 | 41.8 | 42.6 |
| 2041 | 42.1 | 42.7 |
| 2042 | 42.5 | 42.8 |
| 2043 | 42.8 | 42.9 |
| 2044 | 43.1 | 43 |
| 2045 | 43.5 | 43.1 |
| 2046 | 43.8 | 43.2 |
| 2047 | 44.1 | 43.3 |
| 2048 | 44.3 | 43.4 |
| 2049 | 44.6 | 43.5 |
| 2050 | 44.9 | 43.7 |
In 1960, the median age in Brazil was 18 years compared to 27.5 years in New Zealand. As of 2024, the median age had increased to 35.4 years in Brazil and to 38.6 years in New Zealand.
According to United Nations projections, the median age in Brazil is expected to increased to around 44.9 years by 2050 compared to 43.7 years in New Zealand. The aging demographics forecast is based on previous years' birth rates and increasing life expectancy.
Demographic pyramid: age and gender distribution
| Age range | Share of population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| 0-4 | 3.15% | 3.03% | 2.93% | 2.79% |
| 5-9 | 3.42% | 3.28% | 3.08% | 2.91% |
| 10-14 | 3.46% | 3.33% | 3.29% | 3.12% |
| 15-19 | 3.57% | 3.44% | 3.26% | 3.09% |
| 20-24 | 3.76% | 3.66% | 3.24% | 3.07% |
| 25-29 | 3.89% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.24% |
| 30-34 | 3.8% | 3.79% | 3.8% | 3.7% |
| 35-39 | 3.91% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 3.53% |
| 40-44 | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.14% | 3.19% |
| 45-49 | 3.43% | 3.58% | 2.91% | 2.99% |
| 50-54 | 3% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.27% |
| 55-59 | 2.7% | 2.92% | 2.98% | 3.14% |
| 60-64 | 2.4% | 2.67% | 2.93% | 3.14% |
| 65-69 | 1.88% | 2.19% | 2.52% | 2.71% |
| 70-74 | 1.36% | 1.68% | 2.1% | 2.26% |
| 75-79 | 0.85% | 1.13% | 1.66% | 1.83% |
| 80+ | 0.77% | 1.19% | 1.78% | 2.33% |
The chart above is a variation of a population pyramid and represents a comparison of age and gender structure. Brazil has low demographic potential with 49.4% of people in the 0-34 age group compared to 45% and similar potential in New Zealand.
Age dependency chart
| Year | Age dependency ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total | Young | Old | Total | Young | Old | |
| 1960 | 87.7% | 82.9% | 4.74% | 70.9% | 56.1% | 14.8% |
| 1961 | 88.3% | 83.5% | 4.82% | 71.1% | 56.4% | 14.7% |
| 1962 | 88.8% | 83.9% | 4.9% | 70.9% | 56.4% | 14.5% |
| 1963 | 89% | 84% | 4.98% | 70.5% | 56.2% | 14.4% |
| 1964 | 88.9% | 83.9% | 5.05% | 70.1% | 55.9% | 14.2% |
| 1965 | 88.5% | 83.4% | 5.12% | 69.7% | 55.6% | 14.1% |
| 1966 | 87.9% | 82.7% | 5.19% | 69.3% | 55.2% | 14.1% |
| 1967 | 87.1% | 81.9% | 5.25% | 69% | 54.9% | 14.1% |
| 1968 | 86.1% | 80.8% | 5.31% | 68.7% | 54.6% | 14.2% |
| 1969 | 85% | 79.7% | 5.38% | 68.4% | 54.2% | 14.2% |
| 1970 | 83.9% | 78.4% | 5.44% | 67.8% | 53.6% | 14.3% |
| 1971 | 82.6% | 77.1% | 5.5% | 67.3% | 53% | 14.3% |
| 1972 | 81.4% | 75.8% | 5.56% | 66.6% | 52.3% | 14.3% |
| 1973 | 80.1% | 74.5% | 5.63% | 65.7% | 51.4% | 14.3% |
| 1974 | 78.9% | 73.2% | 5.69% | 64.6% | 50.3% | 14.3% |
| 1975 | 77.6% | 71.8% | 5.76% | 63.5% | 49.2% | 14.4% |
| 1976 | 76.4% | 70.6% | 5.83% | 62.6% | 48.1% | 14.5% |
| 1977 | 75.2% | 69.3% | 5.89% | 61.5% | 46.8% | 14.7% |
| 1978 | 74.1% | 68.2% | 5.95% | 60.5% | 45.5% | 15% |
| 1979 | 73.1% | 67.1% | 6.01% | 59.5% | 44.3% | 15.2% |
| 1980 | 72.2% | 66.2% | 6.06% | 58.6% | 43.1% | 15.4% |
| 1981 | 71.5% | 65.4% | 6.11% | 57.7% | 42.1% | 15.6% |
| 1982 | 70.9% | 64.7% | 6.16% | 56.7% | 41% | 15.7% |
| 1983 | 70.4% | 64.2% | 6.22% | 55.5% | 39.8% | 15.7% |
| 1984 | 69.9% | 63.6% | 6.28% | 54.5% | 38.8% | 15.7% |
| 1985 | 69.3% | 63% | 6.34% | 53.7% | 37.9% | 15.8% |
| 1986 | 68.8% | 62.3% | 6.42% | 53% | 37.1% | 16% |
| 1987 | 68.1% | 61.6% | 6.5% | 52.5% | 36.3% | 16.2% |
| 1988 | 67.3% | 60.7% | 6.6% | 52.1% | 35.7% | 16.4% |
| 1989 | 66.5% | 59.8% | 6.71% | 52% | 35.4% | 16.6% |
| 1990 | 65.6% | 58.8% | 6.82% | 52.2% | 35.4% | 16.8% |
| 1991 | 64.6% | 57.6% | 6.94% | 52.3% | 35.3% | 17% |
| 1992 | 63.5% | 56.4% | 7.05% | 52.4% | 35.2% | 17.2% |
| 1993 | 62.3% | 55.1% | 7.17% | 52.6% | 35.2% | 17.4% |
| 1994 | 61.1% | 53.8% | 7.28% | 52.8% | 35.3% | 17.5% |
| 1995 | 59.9% | 52.5% | 7.4% | 52.8% | 35.3% | 17.6% |
| 1996 | 58.6% | 51.1% | 7.52% | 52.8% | 35.2% | 17.6% |
| 1997 | 57.4% | 49.8% | 7.63% | 52.7% | 35.1% | 17.6% |
| 1998 | 56.2% | 48.5% | 7.74% | 52.8% | 35.1% | 17.7% |
| 1999 | 55.1% | 47.2% | 7.84% | 52.8% | 35% | 17.8% |
| 2000 | 53.9% | 46% | 7.93% | 52.7% | 34.8% | 18% |
| 2001 | 52.8% | 44.8% | 8.04% | 52.5% | 34.4% | 18% |
| 2002 | 51.8% | 43.6% | 8.15% | 52% | 34% | 18% |
| 2003 | 50.8% | 42.5% | 8.28% | 51.3% | 33.5% | 17.9% |
| 2004 | 49.8% | 41.4% | 8.44% | 50.8% | 32.9% | 17.9% |
| 2005 | 49% | 40.4% | 8.61% | 50.5% | 32.4% | 18.1% |
| 2006 | 48.3% | 39.5% | 8.79% | 50.4% | 32% | 18.4% |
| 2007 | 47.6% | 38.6% | 9% | 50.4% | 31.8% | 18.7% |
| 2008 | 46.9% | 37.7% | 9.22% | 50.6% | 31.7% | 18.9% |
| 2009 | 46.3% | 36.8% | 9.46% | 50.8% | 31.6% | 19.2% |
| 2010 | 45.7% | 36% | 9.71% | 51.2% | 31.5% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 45.2% | 35.2% | 9.99% | 51.6% | 31.5% | 20.2% |
| 2012 | 44.6% | 34.4% | 10.3% | 52.2% | 31.4% | 20.8% |
| 2013 | 44.2% | 33.5% | 10.6% | 52.7% | 31.2% | 21.5% |
| 2014 | 43.8% | 32.8% | 11% | 52.8% | 30.8% | 21.9% |
| 2015 | 43.6% | 32.2% | 11.4% | 52.5% | 30.3% | 22.2% |
| 2016 | 43.4% | 31.6% | 11.9% | 52.3% | 29.9% | 22.4% |
| 2017 | 43.4% | 31.1% | 12.3% | 52.3% | 29.6% | 22.6% |
| 2018 | 43.4% | 30.6% | 12.8% | 52.4% | 29.4% | 22.9% |
| 2019 | 43.5% | 30.2% | 13.3% | 52.6% | 29.2% | 23.3% |
| 2020 | 43.6% | 29.8% | 13.8% | 53% | 29.1% | 23.9% |
| 2021 | 43.6% | 29.4% | 14.2% | 53.6% | 29% | 24.7% |
| 2022 | 43.8% | 29% | 14.7% | 54.1% | 28.7% | 25.3% |
| 2023 | 44% | 28.7% | 15.3% | 54.3% | 28.3% | 25.9% |
| 2024 | 44.3% | 28.4% | 15.9% | 54.6% | 28% | 26.6% |
Age dependency is the ratio of people not in the labor force (children under 15 and adults 64+) to people aged 15 to 64.
Age dependency in Brazil decreased from 49.8% to 44.3% between 2004 and 2024.
In New Zealand, the ratio of dependent people increased from 50.8% to 54.6% between 2004 and 2024 with a decreased share of young people and an increased proportion of people aged 65+.
Working age demographic
| Year | Working age population share | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 53.3% | 58.5% |
| 1961 | 53.1% | 58.4% |
| 1962 | 53% | 58.5% |
| 1963 | 52.9% | 58.6% |
| 1964 | 52.9% | 58.8% |
| 1965 | 53% | 58.9% |
| 1966 | 53.2% | 59.1% |
| 1967 | 53.4% | 59.2% |
| 1968 | 53.7% | 59.3% |
| 1969 | 54% | 59.4% |
| 1970 | 54.4% | 59.6% |
| 1971 | 54.8% | 59.8% |
| 1972 | 55.1% | 60% |
| 1973 | 55.5% | 60.4% |
| 1974 | 55.9% | 60.8% |
| 1975 | 56.3% | 61.1% |
| 1976 | 56.7% | 61.5% |
| 1977 | 57.1% | 61.9% |
| 1978 | 57.4% | 62.3% |
| 1979 | 57.8% | 62.7% |
| 1980 | 58.1% | 63.1% |
| 1981 | 58.3% | 63.4% |
| 1982 | 58.5% | 63.8% |
| 1983 | 58.7% | 64.3% |
| 1984 | 58.9% | 64.7% |
| 1985 | 59.1% | 65.1% |
| 1986 | 59.3% | 65.3% |
| 1987 | 59.5% | 65.6% |
| 1988 | 59.8% | 65.8% |
| 1989 | 60.1% | 65.8% |
| 1990 | 60.4% | 65.7% |
| 1991 | 60.8% | 65.7% |
| 1992 | 61.2% | 65.6% |
| 1993 | 61.6% | 65.5% |
| 1994 | 62.1% | 65.5% |
| 1995 | 62.6% | 65.4% |
| 1996 | 63% | 65.4% |
| 1997 | 63.5% | 65.5% |
| 1998 | 64% | 65.5% |
| 1999 | 64.5% | 65.5% |
| 2000 | 65% | 65.5% |
| 2001 | 65.4% | 65.6% |
| 2002 | 65.9% | 65.8% |
| 2003 | 66.3% | 66.1% |
| 2004 | 66.7% | 66.3% |
| 2005 | 67.1% | 66.4% |
| 2006 | 67.4% | 66.5% |
| 2007 | 67.8% | 66.5% |
| 2008 | 68.1% | 66.4% |
| 2009 | 68.3% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 68.6% | 66.2% |
| 2011 | 68.9% | 65.9% |
| 2012 | 69.1% | 65.7% |
| 2013 | 69.4% | 65.5% |
| 2014 | 69.5% | 65.5% |
| 2015 | 69.6% | 65.6% |
| 2016 | 69.7% | 65.7% |
| 2017 | 69.7% | 65.7% |
| 2018 | 69.7% | 65.6% |
| 2019 | 69.7% | 65.5% |
| 2020 | 69.6% | 65.4% |
| 2021 | 69.6% | 65.1% |
| 2022 | 69.5% | 64.9% |
| 2023 | 69.4% | 64.8% |
| 2024 | 69.3% | 64.7% |
| 2025 | 69.1% | 64.5% |
| 2026 | 69% | 64.3% |
| 2027 | 68.8% | 64.1% |
| 2028 | 68.6% | 63.9% |
| 2029 | 68.5% | 63.7% |
| 2030 | 68.4% | 63.5% |
| 2031 | 68.2% | 63.3% |
| 2032 | 68.1% | 63.2% |
| 2033 | 68% | 63% |
| 2034 | 67.8% | 62.8% |
| 2035 | 67.7% | 62.6% |
| 2036 | 67.5% | 62.4% |
| 2037 | 67.3% | 62.2% |
| 2038 | 67% | 62% |
| 2039 | 66.8% | 61.9% |
| 2040 | 66.5% | 61.8% |
| 2041 | 66.2% | 61.7% |
| 2042 | 65.9% | 61.7% |
| 2043 | 65.6% | 61.6% |
| 2044 | 65.2% | 61.5% |
| 2045 | 64.8% | 61.4% |
| 2046 | 64.4% | 61.3% |
| 2047 | 64% | 61.2% |
| 2048 | 63.6% | 61.1% |
| 2049 | 63.2% | 60.9% |
| 2050 | 62.8% | 60.8% |
Between 2004 and 2024, the share of working-age demographics aged 15-64 changed from 66.7% to 69.3% in Brazil and from 66.3% to 64.7% in New Zealand.
Share of young demographic (0-14 years old)
| Year | Share of people 0-14 years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 44.2% | 32.8% |
| 1961 | 44.3% | 33% |
| 1962 | 44.4% | 33% |
| 1963 | 44.5% | 32.9% |
| 1964 | 44.4% | 32.9% |
| 1965 | 44.2% | 32.7% |
| 1966 | 44% | 32.6% |
| 1967 | 43.8% | 32.5% |
| 1968 | 43.4% | 32.3% |
| 1969 | 43% | 32.2% |
| 1970 | 42.7% | 31.9% |
| 1971 | 42.2% | 31.7% |
| 1972 | 41.8% | 31.4% |
| 1973 | 41.4% | 31% |
| 1974 | 40.9% | 30.5% |
| 1975 | 40.5% | 30.1% |
| 1976 | 40% | 29.6% |
| 1977 | 39.6% | 29% |
| 1978 | 39.1% | 28.4% |
| 1979 | 38.8% | 27.8% |
| 1980 | 38.4% | 27.2% |
| 1981 | 38.1% | 26.7% |
| 1982 | 37.9% | 26.2% |
| 1983 | 37.7% | 25.6% |
| 1984 | 37.4% | 25.1% |
| 1985 | 37.2% | 24.6% |
| 1986 | 36.9% | 24.2% |
| 1987 | 36.6% | 23.8% |
| 1988 | 36.3% | 23.5% |
| 1989 | 35.9% | 23.3% |
| 1990 | 35.5% | 23.3% |
| 1991 | 35% | 23.2% |
| 1992 | 34.5% | 23.1% |
| 1993 | 34% | 23.1% |
| 1994 | 33.4% | 23.1% |
| 1995 | 32.8% | 23.1% |
| 1996 | 32.2% | 23% |
| 1997 | 31.6% | 23% |
| 1998 | 31% | 23% |
| 1999 | 30.5% | 22.9% |
| 2000 | 29.9% | 22.8% |
| 2001 | 29.3% | 22.6% |
| 2002 | 28.7% | 22.4% |
| 2003 | 28.2% | 22.1% |
| 2004 | 27.6% | 21.8% |
| 2005 | 27.1% | 21.5% |
| 2006 | 26.6% | 21.3% |
| 2007 | 26.1% | 21.1% |
| 2008 | 25.7% | 21% |
| 2009 | 25.2% | 20.9% |
| 2010 | 24.7% | 20.9% |
| 2011 | 24.2% | 20.8% |
| 2012 | 23.7% | 20.6% |
| 2013 | 23.3% | 20.4% |
| 2014 | 22.8% | 20.2% |
| 2015 | 22.4% | 19.9% |
| 2016 | 22% | 19.6% |
| 2017 | 21.7% | 19.5% |
| 2018 | 21.4% | 19.3% |
| 2019 | 21.1% | 19.2% |
| 2020 | 20.8% | 19% |
| 2021 | 20.5% | 18.9% |
| 2022 | 20.2% | 18.6% |
| 2023 | 19.9% | 18.4% |
| 2024 | 19.7% | 18.1% |
| 2025 | 19.4% | 17.9% |
| 2026 | 19.1% | 17.6% |
| 2027 | 18.8% | 17.4% |
| 2028 | 18.5% | 17.2% |
| 2029 | 18.2% | 17% |
| 2030 | 17.9% | 16.8% |
| 2031 | 17.7% | 16.6% |
| 2032 | 17.4% | 16.4% |
| 2033 | 17.1% | 16.3% |
| 2034 | 16.9% | 16.1% |
| 2035 | 16.6% | 16% |
| 2036 | 16.4% | 15.9% |
| 2037 | 16.2% | 15.8% |
| 2038 | 16.1% | 15.7% |
| 2039 | 15.9% | 15.6% |
| 2040 | 15.8% | 15.5% |
| 2041 | 15.6% | 15.4% |
| 2042 | 15.5% | 15.4% |
| 2043 | 15.4% | 15.4% |
| 2044 | 15.3% | 15.3% |
| 2045 | 15.2% | 15.3% |
| 2046 | 15.1% | 15.3% |
| 2047 | 15% | 15.3% |
| 2048 | 14.9% | 15.3% |
| 2049 | 14.8% | 15.2% |
| 2050 | 14.6% | 15.2% |
The share of young people aged below 15 is 19.7% in Brazil and 18.1% in New Zealand. Birth rates in Brazil compared to New Zealand .
Share of old population (65+)
| Year | Share of population 65+ years old | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1960 | 2.53% | 8.68% |
| 1961 | 2.56% | 8.59% |
| 1962 | 2.59% | 8.5% |
| 1963 | 2.63% | 8.42% |
| 1964 | 2.67% | 8.36% |
| 1965 | 2.71% | 8.32% |
| 1966 | 2.76% | 8.32% |
| 1967 | 2.81% | 8.35% |
| 1968 | 2.85% | 8.4% |
| 1969 | 2.91% | 8.44% |
| 1970 | 2.96% | 8.49% |
| 1971 | 3.01% | 8.55% |
| 1972 | 3.07% | 8.6% |
| 1973 | 3.12% | 8.65% |
| 1974 | 3.18% | 8.7% |
| 1975 | 3.24% | 8.78% |
| 1976 | 3.3% | 8.92% |
| 1977 | 3.36% | 9.1% |
| 1978 | 3.42% | 9.32% |
| 1979 | 3.47% | 9.54% |
| 1980 | 3.52% | 9.73% |
| 1981 | 3.56% | 9.89% |
| 1982 | 3.61% | 10% |
| 1983 | 3.65% | 10.1% |
| 1984 | 3.69% | 10.1% |
| 1985 | 3.74% | 10.3% |
| 1986 | 3.8% | 10.4% |
| 1987 | 3.87% | 10.6% |
| 1988 | 3.95% | 10.8% |
| 1989 | 4.03% | 10.9% |
| 1990 | 4.12% | 11% |
| 1991 | 4.21% | 11.2% |
| 1992 | 4.31% | 11.3% |
| 1993 | 4.42% | 11.4% |
| 1994 | 4.52% | 11.5% |
| 1995 | 4.63% | 11.5% |
| 1996 | 4.74% | 11.5% |
| 1997 | 4.85% | 11.5% |
| 1998 | 4.95% | 11.6% |
| 1999 | 5.05% | 11.7% |
| 2000 | 5.15% | 11.8% |
| 2001 | 5.26% | 11.8% |
| 2002 | 5.37% | 11.8% |
| 2003 | 5.49% | 11.8% |
| 2004 | 5.63% | 11.9% |
| 2005 | 5.78% | 12% |
| 2006 | 5.93% | 12.2% |
| 2007 | 6.1% | 12.4% |
| 2008 | 6.27% | 12.6% |
| 2009 | 6.46% | 12.8% |
| 2010 | 6.67% | 13% |
| 2011 | 6.88% | 13.3% |
| 2012 | 7.11% | 13.7% |
| 2013 | 7.37% | 14.1% |
| 2014 | 7.65% | 14.4% |
| 2015 | 7.96% | 14.6% |
| 2016 | 8.27% | 14.7% |
| 2017 | 8.59% | 14.9% |
| 2018 | 8.93% | 15.1% |
| 2019 | 9.27% | 15.3% |
| 2020 | 9.6% | 15.6% |
| 2021 | 9.91% | 16% |
| 2022 | 10.3% | 16.4% |
| 2023 | 10.6% | 16.8% |
| 2024 | 11% | 17.2% |
| 2025 | 11.5% | 17.6% |
| 2026 | 11.9% | 18% |
| 2027 | 12.4% | 18.5% |
| 2028 | 12.8% | 18.9% |
| 2029 | 13.3% | 19.3% |
| 2030 | 13.7% | 19.7% |
| 2031 | 14.1% | 20.1% |
| 2032 | 14.5% | 20.4% |
| 2033 | 14.9% | 20.7% |
| 2034 | 15.3% | 21.1% |
| 2035 | 15.7% | 21.4% |
| 2036 | 16.1% | 21.7% |
| 2037 | 16.5% | 22% |
| 2038 | 16.9% | 22.3% |
| 2039 | 17.3% | 22.5% |
| 2040 | 17.7% | 22.7% |
| 2041 | 18.1% | 22.8% |
| 2042 | 18.6% | 22.9% |
| 2043 | 19% | 23% |
| 2044 | 19.5% | 23.1% |
| 2045 | 20% | 23.3% |
| 2046 | 20.5% | 23.4% |
| 2047 | 21% | 23.5% |
| 2048 | 21.5% | 23.7% |
| 2049 | 22% | 23.8% |
| 2050 | 22.5% | 24% |
The share of older people aged 65 and over is 11% in Brazil and 17.2% in New Zealand. Life expectancy in Brazil compared to New Zealand .
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Demographics by nationality or race
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Race | Share of demographic |
| Mulatto | 45.3% |
| White | 43.5% |
| Black | 10.2% |
| Indigenous | 0.6% |
| Asian | 0.42% |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Race | Share of demographic |
| New Zealand European | 55.6% |
| Maori | 14.3% |
| Chinese | 4.29% |
| Indian | 4.1% |
| Samoan | 3.37% |
| Tongan | 1.52% |
| Cook Island Maori | 1.49% |
| Filipino | 1.34% |
| English | 1.33% |
| South African | 0.84% |
| All other | 0.07% |
Religion demographics in Brazil vs New Zealand
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Religion | Share of population |
| Christianity | 80.7% |
| Atheism | 13.5% |
| Buddhism | 0.1% |
| Judaism | 0.04% |
| Islam | 0.02% |
| Hinduism | 0.0008% |
| All other | 5.71% |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Religion | Share of population |
| Atheism | 51.4% |
| Christianity | 40.3% |
| Hinduism | 2.79% |
| Islam | 1.36% |
| Buddhism | 1.19% |
| Judaism | 0.11% |
| All other | 2.87% |
Median age map
Median age
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Demographics comparisons