Lithuania has a population density of 117.1 people per square mile compared to 372 people in Tonga. Lithuania has 243,357 sq ft of land per person vs 77,340 sq ft in Tonga. Lithuania and Tonga rank 143rd and 69th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Lithuania has 0.04% of the world's population and 0.04% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.001% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Tonga, making the population density in Lithuania 68.5% lower than in Tonga.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Lithuania
|
Tonga
|
|
| 2026 | 117.1 | 372 |
| 2025 | 118.9 | 373 |
| 2024 | 119.5 | 375 |
| 2023 | 118.8 | 376 |
| 2022 | 117.1 | 378 |
| 2021 | 116.2 | 379 |
| 2020 | 116.2 | 380 |
| 2019 | 116.3 | 380 |
| 2018 | 116.6 | 380 |
| 2017 | 117.5 | 379 |
| 2016 | 119 | 380 |
| 2015 | 120.3 | 382 |
| 2014 | 121.4 | 383 |
| 2013 | 122.4 | 385 |
| 2012 | 123.5 | 387 |
| 2011 | 125.1 | 387 |
| 2010 | 128 | 386 |
| 2009 | 130.7 | 386 |
| 2008 | 132.2 | 385 |
| 2007 | 133.5 | 384 |
| 2006 | 135.1 | 382 |
| 2005 | 137.3 | 380 |
| 2004 | 139.5 | 378 |
| 2003 | 141.1 | 376 |
| 2002 | 142.3 | 374 |
| 2001 | 143.4 | 372 |
| 2000 | 144.6 | 369 |
| 1999 | 145.6 | 367 |
| 1998 | 146.7 | 365 |
| 1997 | 147.7 | 362 |
| 1996 | 148.8 | 361 |
| 1995 | 150 | 361 |
| 1994 | 151.1 | 360 |
| 1993 | 152.2 | 360 |
| 1992 | 152.9 | 360 |
| 1991 | - | 359 |
| 1990 | - | 359 |
| 1989 | - | 358 |
| 1988 | - | 356 |
| 1987 | - | 354 |
| 1986 | - | 353 |
| 1985 | - | 352 |
| 1984 | - | 352 |
| 1983 | - | 353 |
| 1982 | - | 352 |
| 1981 | - | 352 |
| 1980 | - | 352 |
| 1979 | - | 351 |
| 1978 | - | 350 |
| 1977 | - | 348 |
| 1976 | - | 343 |
| 1975 | - | 335 |
| 1974 | - | 326 |
| 1973 | - | 319 |
| 1972 | - | 314 |
| 1971 | - | 309 |
| 1970 | - | 304 |
| 1969 | - | 298.2 |
| 1968 | - | 292.6 |
| 1967 | - | 287.1 |
| 1966 | - | 280.6 |
| 1965 | - | 273.1 |
| 1964 | - | 265.8 |
| 1963 | - | 258.6 |
| 1962 | - | 251.6 |
| 1961 | - | 244.7 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/lithuania/tonga | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Lithuania decreased by 13.3%, compared to a 2.77% decline in Tonga.
In 2006, Lithuania ranked 122nd by population density and is 143rd now. Tonga was 54th in 2006 and ranks 69th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Lithuania
|
Tonga
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 117.1 ppl/mi² | 372 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 143/197 | 69/197 |
| Population |
2829914
|
103309
|
| Land area | 24,170 sq mi | 278 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 233,295 sq ft | 74,394 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.2% | 78.8% |
| Urban population | 68.8% | 21.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Lithuania
|
Tonga
|
|
| 2024 | 68.8% | 21.2% |
| 2023 | 68.6% | 21.1% |
| 2022 | 68.3% | 21.1% |
| 2021 | 68.2% | 21.3% |
| 2020 | 67.4% | 21.9% |
| 2019 | 67.2% | 22.3% |
| 2018 | 67.1% | 22.7% |
| 2017 | 67.1% | 23% |
| 2016 | 67.2% | 23.1% |
| 2015 | 67.2% | 23.2% |
| 2014 | 67.2% | 23.3% |
| 2013 | 67% | 23.4% |
| 2012 | 66.9% | 23.5% |
| 2011 | 66.8% | 23.5% |
| 2010 | 66.8% | 23.4% |
| 2009 | 66.8% | 23.4% |
| 2008 | 66.8% | 23.3% |
| 2007 | 66.7% | 23.2% |
| 2006 | 66.6% | 23.2% |
| 2005 | 66.6% | 23.1% |
| 2004 | 66.6% | 23.1% |
| 2003 | 66.8% | 23.1% |
| 2002 | 66.9% | 23.1% |
| 2001 | 66.9% | 23% |
| 2000 | 67% | 23% |
| 1999 | 67% | 23% |
| 1998 | 67.1% | 23% |
| 1997 | 67.2% | 22.9% |
| 1996 | 67.3% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 67.3% | 22.8% |
| 1994 | 67.4% | 22.7% |
| 1993 | 67.5% | 22.6% |
| 1992 | 67.6% | 22.5% |
| 1991 | 67.6% | 22.4% |
| 1990 | 67.7% | 22.2% |
| 1989 | 67.7% | 22% |
| 1988 | 67.4% | 21.9% |
| 1987 | 66.8% | 21.7% |
| 1986 | 66.1% | 21.5% |
| 1985 | 65.5% | 21.4% |
| 1984 | 64.8% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 64.1% | 21% |
| 1982 | 63.3% | 20.9% |
| 1981 | 62.5% | 20.7% |
| 1980 | 61.5% | 20.6% |
| 1979 | 60.5% | 20.5% |
| 1978 | 59.4% | 20.4% |
| 1977 | 58.3% | 20.4% |
| 1976 | 57.3% | 20.3% |
| 1975 | 56.2% | 20.3% |
| 1974 | 55% | 20.3% |
| 1973 | 53.9% | 20.2% |
| 1972 | 52.6% | 20.2% |
| 1971 | 51.3% | 20.2% |
| 1970 | 50.6% | 20.2% |
| 1969 | 49.3% | 20.2% |
| 1968 | 47.8% | 20.1% |
| 1967 | 46.6% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 45.5% | 20% |
| 1965 | 44.4% | 19.9% |
| 1964 | 43.4% | 19.7% |
| 1963 | 42.4% | 19.4% |
| 1962 | 41.5% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 40.7% | 18.7% |
| 1960 | 39.8% | 18.3% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/lithuania/tonga | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 66.6% to 68.8% in Lithuania and from 23.1% to 21.2% in Tonga.
Densely populated cities
|
Lithuania
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Vilnius | 581K |
| Kaunas | 305K |
| Klaipeda | 158K |
| Siauliai | 104K |
| Panevezys | 87.9K |
| Alytus | 51.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/lithuania/tonga | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2023–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.