Serbia has a population density of 202.9 people per square mile compared to 375 people in Tonga. Serbia has 144,613 sq ft of land per person vs 77,340 sq ft in Tonga. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Serbia and Tonga are ranked 110th and 68th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Serbia has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.001% of the population and 0.0005% of the land area for Tonga, hence the population density in Serbia is 45.9% lower than in Tonga.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.9 ppl/mi² | 375 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 110/197 | 68/197 |
| Population |
6541064
|
103744
|
| Land area | 32,467 sq mi | 278 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,408 sq ft | 74,394 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.6% | 76.8% |
| Urban population | 57.4% | 23.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 18.2% | 0% |
Serbia vs Tonga:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Serbia decreased by 7.56%, compared to a 1.96% decline in Tonga.
In 2006, Serbia ranked 87th for population density and is in 110th place now. Tonga was 54th in 2006 and ranks 68th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 202.9 | 375 |
| 2023 | 204 | 376 |
| 2022 | 205.3 | 378 |
| 2021 | 210.5 | 379 |
| 2020 | 212.5 | 380 |
| 2019 | 205.7 | 380 |
| 2018 | 206.8 | 380 |
| 2017 | 207.9 | 379 |
| 2016 | 209 | 380 |
| 2015 | 210.1 | 382 |
| 2014 | 211.2 | 383 |
| 2013 | 212.2 | 385 |
| 2012 | 213.3 | 387 |
| 2011 | 214.3 | 387 |
| 2010 | 215.9 | 386 |
| 2009 | 216.8 | 386 |
| 2008 | 217.7 | 385 |
| 2007 | 218.6 | 384 |
| 2006 | 219.5 | 382 |
| 2005 | - | 380 |
| 2004 | - | 378 |
| 2003 | - | 376 |
| 2002 | - | 374 |
| 2001 | - | 372 |
| 2000 | - | 369 |
| 1999 | - | 367 |
| 1998 | - | 365 |
| 1997 | - | 362 |
| 1996 | - | 361 |
| 1995 | - | 361 |
| 1994 | - | 360 |
| 1993 | - | 360 |
| 1992 | - | 360 |
| 1991 | - | 359 |
| 1990 | - | 359 |
| 1989 | - | 358 |
| 1988 | - | 356 |
| 1987 | - | 354 |
| 1986 | - | 353 |
| 1985 | - | 352 |
| 1984 | - | 352 |
| 1983 | - | 353 |
| 1982 | - | 352 |
| 1981 | - | 352 |
| 1980 | - | 352 |
| 1979 | - | 351 |
| 1978 | - | 350 |
| 1977 | - | 348 |
| 1976 | - | 343 |
| 1975 | - | 335 |
| 1974 | - | 326 |
| 1973 | - | 319 |
| 1972 | - | 314 |
| 1971 | - | 309 |
| 1970 | - | 304 |
| 1969 | - | 298.2 |
| 1968 | - | 292.6 |
| 1967 | - | 287.1 |
| 1966 | - | 280.6 |
| 1965 | - | 273.1 |
| 1964 | - | 265.8 |
| 1963 | - | 258.6 |
| 1962 | - | 251.6 |
| 1961 | - | 244.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 57.4% | 23.2% |
| 2023 | 57.1% | 23.2% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 23.1% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 23.1% |
| 2020 | 56.4% | 23.1% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 23.1% |
| 2018 | 56.1% | 23.1% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | 23.2% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 23.2% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | 23.3% |
| 2014 | 55.6% | 23.3% |
| 2013 | 55.5% | 23.4% |
| 2012 | 55.4% | 23.4% |
| 2011 | 55.2% | 23.4% |
| 2010 | 55% | 23.4% |
| 2009 | 54.8% | 23.3% |
| 2008 | 54.5% | 23.3% |
| 2007 | 54.3% | 23.2% |
| 2006 | 54.1% | 23.2% |
| 2005 | 53.9% | 23.2% |
| 2004 | 53.7% | 23.1% |
| 2003 | 53.4% | 23.1% |
| 2002 | 53.2% | 23.1% |
| 2001 | 53% | 23% |
| 2000 | 52.8% | 23% |
| 1999 | 52.5% | 23% |
| 1998 | 52.3% | 23% |
| 1997 | 52.1% | 22.9% |
| 1996 | 51.9% | 22.9% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 22.9% |
| 1994 | 51.4% | 22.8% |
| 1993 | 51.2% | 22.8% |
| 1992 | 51% | 22.8% |
| 1991 | 50.8% | 22.7% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 22.7% |
| 1989 | 50% | 22.7% |
| 1988 | 49.6% | 22.6% |
| 1987 | 49.2% | 22.6% |
| 1986 | 48.8% | 22.5% |
| 1985 | 48.3% | 22.3% |
| 1984 | 47.9% | 22% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 21.8% |
| 1982 | 47.1% | 21.6% |
| 1981 | 46.7% | 21.4% |
| 1980 | 46.1% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 45.5% | 20.9% |
| 1978 | 44.9% | 20.7% |
| 1977 | 44.3% | 20.5% |
| 1976 | 43.7% | 20.4% |
| 1975 | 43.1% | 20.3% |
| 1974 | 42.5% | 20.3% |
| 1973 | 41.9% | 20.3% |
| 1972 | 41.3% | 20.2% |
| 1971 | 40.7% | 20.2% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 20.2% |
| 1969 | 38.6% | 20.2% |
| 1968 | 37.5% | 20.1% |
| 1967 | 36.4% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 35.3% | 19.9% |
| 1965 | 34.2% | 19.5% |
| 1964 | 33.1% | 19.1% |
| 1963 | 32.1% | 18.7% |
| 1962 | 31.1% | 18.3% |
| 1961 | 30.1% | 17.9% |
| 1960 | 29.1% | 17.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia and from 23.1% to 23.2% in Tonga.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons