Serbia has a population density of 202.9 people per square mile compared to 111.4 people in Zimbabwe. Serbia has 144,613 sq ft of land per person vs 252,854 sq ft in Zimbabwe. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Serbia and Zimbabwe are ranked 110th and 145th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Serbia has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.2% of the population and 0.26% of the land area for Zimbabwe, hence the population density in Serbia is 82.2% higher than in Zimbabwe.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.9 ppl/mi² | 111.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 110/197 | 145/197 |
| Population |
6541064
|
17210092
|
| Land area | 32,467 sq mi | 149,364 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,408 sq ft | 250,326 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.6% | 67.3% |
| Urban population | 57.4% | 32.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 18.2% | 22.8% |
Serbia vs Zimbabwe:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Serbia decreased by 7.56%, compared to a 31.6% growth in Zimbabwe.
In 2006, Serbia ranked 87th for population density and is in 110th place now. Zimbabwe was 145th in 2006 and still ranks 145th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 202.9 | 111.4 |
| 2023 | 204 | 109.4 |
| 2022 | 205.3 | 107.6 |
| 2021 | 210.5 | 105.8 |
| 2020 | 212.5 | 104 |
| 2019 | 205.7 | 102.2 |
| 2018 | 206.8 | 100.7 |
| 2017 | 207.9 | 99.2 |
| 2016 | 209 | 97.8 |
| 2015 | 210.1 | 96.4 |
| 2014 | 211.2 | 95.1 |
| 2013 | 212.2 | 93.8 |
| 2012 | 213.3 | 92.5 |
| 2011 | 214.3 | 91 |
| 2010 | 215.9 | 89.4 |
| 2009 | 216.8 | 88 |
| 2008 | 217.7 | 86.8 |
| 2007 | 218.6 | 85.7 |
| 2006 | 219.5 | 84.6 |
| 2005 | - | 83.6 |
| 2004 | - | 82.8 |
| 2003 | - | 81.9 |
| 2002 | - | 80.9 |
| 2001 | - | 80.2 |
| 2000 | - | 79.6 |
| 1999 | - | 78.9 |
| 1998 | - | 77.6 |
| 1997 | - | 76.1 |
| 1996 | - | 74.7 |
| 1995 | - | 73.5 |
| 1994 | - | 72.8 |
| 1993 | - | 72.7 |
| 1992 | - | 71.7 |
| 1991 | - | 69.7 |
| 1990 | - | 67.9 |
| 1989 | - | 66 |
| 1988 | - | 64.2 |
| 1987 | - | 62.2 |
| 1986 | - | 60.1 |
| 1985 | - | 58.2 |
| 1984 | - | 56.2 |
| 1983 | - | 54.2 |
| 1982 | - | 52.2 |
| 1981 | - | 50.2 |
| 1980 | - | 47.1 |
| 1979 | - | 44.5 |
| 1978 | - | 43.8 |
| 1977 | - | 43.2 |
| 1976 | - | 42.1 |
| 1975 | - | 40.8 |
| 1974 | - | 39.6 |
| 1973 | - | 38.3 |
| 1972 | - | 37.1 |
| 1971 | - | 36 |
| 1970 | - | 34.9 |
| 1969 | - | 33.9 |
| 1968 | - | 32.8 |
| 1967 | - | 31.8 |
| 1966 | - | 30.8 |
| 1965 | - | 29.8 |
| 1964 | - | 28.9 |
| 1963 | - | 28 |
| 1962 | - | 27.2 |
| 1961 | - | 26.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 57.4% | 32.7% |
| 2023 | 57.1% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 32.4% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 32.3% |
| 2020 | 56.4% | 32.2% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 32.2% |
| 2018 | 56.1% | 32.2% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | 32.2% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 32.3% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | 32.4% |
| 2014 | 55.6% | 32.5% |
| 2013 | 55.5% | 32.7% |
| 2012 | 55.4% | 32.8% |
| 2011 | 55.2% | 33% |
| 2010 | 55% | 33.2% |
| 2009 | 54.8% | 33.4% |
| 2008 | 54.5% | 33.6% |
| 2007 | 54.3% | 33.7% |
| 2006 | 54.1% | 33.9% |
| 2005 | 53.9% | 34.1% |
| 2004 | 53.7% | 34.3% |
| 2003 | 53.4% | 34.5% |
| 2002 | 53.2% | 34.6% |
| 2001 | 53% | 34.2% |
| 2000 | 52.8% | 33.8% |
| 1999 | 52.5% | 33.3% |
| 1998 | 52.3% | 32.9% |
| 1997 | 52.1% | 32.5% |
| 1996 | 51.9% | 32.1% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 31.7% |
| 1994 | 51.4% | 31.3% |
| 1993 | 51.2% | 30.9% |
| 1992 | 51% | 30.5% |
| 1991 | 50.8% | 29.7% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 29% |
| 1989 | 50% | 28.2% |
| 1988 | 49.6% | 27.5% |
| 1987 | 49.2% | 26.8% |
| 1986 | 48.8% | 26.1% |
| 1985 | 48.3% | 25.4% |
| 1984 | 47.9% | 24.7% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 24.1% |
| 1982 | 47.1% | 23.4% |
| 1981 | 46.7% | 22.9% |
| 1980 | 46.1% | 22.4% |
| 1979 | 45.5% | 21.9% |
| 1978 | 44.9% | 21.3% |
| 1977 | 44.3% | 20.8% |
| 1976 | 43.7% | 20.4% |
| 1975 | 43.1% | 19.9% |
| 1974 | 42.5% | 19.4% |
| 1973 | 41.9% | 18.9% |
| 1972 | 41.3% | 18.4% |
| 1971 | 40.7% | 17.9% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 17.4% |
| 1969 | 38.6% | 16.9% |
| 1968 | 37.5% | 16.3% |
| 1967 | 36.4% | 15.7% |
| 1966 | 35.3% | 15.2% |
| 1965 | 34.2% | 14.6% |
| 1964 | 33.1% | 14.1% |
| 1963 | 32.1% | 13.6% |
| 1962 | 31.1% | 13.1% |
| 1961 | 30.1% | 12.8% |
| 1960 | 29.1% | 12.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia and from 34.3% to 32.7% in Zimbabwe.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons