Serbia has a population density of 202.9 people per square mile compared to 691 people in Trinidad and Tobago. Serbia has 144,613 sq ft of land per person vs 40,339 sq ft in Trinidad and Tobago. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Serbia and Trinidad and Tobago are ranked 110th and 38th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Serbia has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.003% of the land area for Trinidad and Tobago, hence the population density in Serbia is 70.6% lower than in Trinidad and Tobago.
Population density comparison
Serbia
|
Trinidad
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.9 ppl/mi² | 691 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 110/197 | 38/197 |
| Population |
6541064
|
1372940
|
| Land area | 32,467 sq mi | 1,981 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,408 sq ft | 40,355 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.6% | 46.4% |
| Urban population | 57.4% | 53.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 18.2% | 0% |
Serbia vs Trinidad and Tobago:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Serbia decreased by 7.56%, compared to a 5.42% growth in Trinidad and Tobago.
In 2006, Serbia ranked 87th for population density and is in 110th place now. Trinidad and Tobago was 34th in 2006 and ranks 38th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Serbia
|
Trinidad
|
|
| 2024 | 202.9 | 691 |
| 2023 | 204 | 690 |
| 2022 | 205.3 | 690 |
| 2021 | 210.5 | 690 |
| 2020 | 212.5 | 690 |
| 2019 | 205.7 | 689 |
| 2018 | 206.8 | 686 |
| 2017 | 207.9 | 685 |
| 2016 | 209 | 684 |
| 2015 | 210.1 | 681 |
| 2014 | 211.2 | 679 |
| 2013 | 212.2 | 677 |
| 2012 | 213.3 | 674 |
| 2011 | 214.3 | 670 |
| 2010 | 215.9 | 665 |
| 2009 | 216.8 | 661 |
| 2008 | 217.7 | 661 |
| 2007 | 218.6 | 658 |
| 2006 | 219.5 | 655 |
| 2005 | - | 654 |
| 2004 | - | 679 |
| 2003 | - | 676 |
| 2002 | - | 672 |
| 2001 | - | 669 |
| 2000 | - | 666 |
| 1999 | - | 664 |
| 1998 | - | 661 |
| 1997 | - | 659 |
| 1996 | - | 657 |
| 1995 | - | 654 |
| 1994 | - | 650 |
| 1993 | - | 646 |
| 1992 | - | 642 |
| 1991 | - | 637 |
| 1990 | - | 632 |
| 1989 | - | 627 |
| 1988 | - | 621 |
| 1987 | - | 615 |
| 1986 | - | 607 |
| 1985 | - | 599 |
| 1984 | - | 592 |
| 1983 | - | 586 |
| 1982 | - | 580 |
| 1981 | - | 573 |
| 1980 | - | 566 |
| 1979 | - | 559 |
| 1978 | - | 552 |
| 1977 | - | 545 |
| 1976 | - | 538 |
| 1975 | - | 532 |
| 1974 | - | 525 |
| 1973 | - | 519 |
| 1972 | - | 512 |
| 1971 | - | 506 |
| 1970 | - | 501 |
| 1969 | - | 495 |
| 1968 | - | 489 |
| 1967 | - | 483 |
| 1966 | - | 476 |
| 1965 | - | 469 |
| 1964 | - | 461 |
| 1963 | - | 453 |
| 1962 | - | 444 |
| 1961 | - | 436 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Serbia
|
Trinidad
|
|
| 2024 | 57.4% | 53.6% |
| 2023 | 57.1% | 53.4% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 53.3% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 53.3% |
| 2020 | 56.4% | 53.2% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 53.2% |
| 2018 | 56.1% | 53.2% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | 53.2% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 53.2% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | 53.3% |
| 2014 | 55.6% | 53.4% |
| 2013 | 55.5% | 53.5% |
| 2012 | 55.4% | 53.7% |
| 2011 | 55.2% | 53.8% |
| 2010 | 55% | 54% |
| 2009 | 54.8% | 54.2% |
| 2008 | 54.5% | 54.4% |
| 2007 | 54.3% | 54.6% |
| 2006 | 54.1% | 54.8% |
| 2005 | 53.9% | 55% |
| 2004 | 53.7% | 55.2% |
| 2003 | 53.4% | 55.3% |
| 2002 | 53.2% | 55.5% |
| 2001 | 53% | 55.7% |
| 2000 | 52.8% | 55.9% |
| 1999 | 52.5% | 55.8% |
| 1998 | 52.3% | 55.6% |
| 1997 | 52.1% | 55.4% |
| 1996 | 51.9% | 55.2% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 55% |
| 1994 | 51.4% | 54.9% |
| 1993 | 51.2% | 54.7% |
| 1992 | 51% | 54.5% |
| 1991 | 50.8% | 54.3% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 54.1% |
| 1989 | 50% | 53.9% |
| 1988 | 49.6% | 53.8% |
| 1987 | 49.2% | 53.6% |
| 1986 | 48.8% | 53.4% |
| 1985 | 48.3% | 53.2% |
| 1984 | 47.9% | 53% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 52.8% |
| 1982 | 47.1% | 52.7% |
| 1981 | 46.7% | 52.5% |
| 1980 | 46.1% | 52.3% |
| 1979 | 45.5% | 51.4% |
| 1978 | 44.9% | 50.5% |
| 1977 | 44.3% | 49.6% |
| 1976 | 43.7% | 48.6% |
| 1975 | 43.1% | 47.7% |
| 1974 | 42.5% | 46.8% |
| 1973 | 41.9% | 45.8% |
| 1972 | 41.3% | 44.9% |
| 1971 | 40.7% | 44% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 43% |
| 1969 | 38.6% | 42.1% |
| 1968 | 37.5% | 41.2% |
| 1967 | 36.4% | 40.3% |
| 1966 | 35.3% | 39.4% |
| 1965 | 34.2% | 38.5% |
| 1964 | 33.1% | 37.6% |
| 1963 | 32.1% | 36.7% |
| 1962 | 31.1% | 35.9% |
| 1961 | 30.1% | 35% |
| 1960 | 29.1% | 34.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia and from 55.2% to 53.6% in Trinidad and Tobago.
Densely populated cities
|
Serbia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Belgrade | 1.2M |
| Novi Sad | 260K |
| Pristina | 199K |
| Nis | 183K |
| Kragujevac | 151K |
| Subotica | 106K |
| Valjevo | 90.3K |
| Cacak | 71.9K |
| Mitrovica | 71.6K |
| Novi Pazar | 66.5K |
|
Trinidad
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Port of Spain | 84.1K |
| Chaguanas | 83.5K |
| San Fernando | 55.4K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
