Serbia has a population density of 202.9 people per square mile compared to 1,373 people in South Korea. Serbia has 144,613 sq ft of land per person vs 20,861 sq ft in South Korea. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Serbia and South Korea are ranked 110th and 18th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Serbia has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.64% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for South Korea, hence the population density in Serbia is 85.2% lower than in South Korea.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.9 ppl/mi² | 1,373 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 110/197 | 18/197 |
| Population |
6541064
|
51700480
|
| Land area | 32,467 sq mi | 37,684 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,408 sq ft | 20,300 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.6% | 18.5% |
| Urban population | 57.4% | 81.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 18.2% | 52% |
Serbia vs South Korea:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Serbia decreased by 7.56%, compared to a 6.05% growth in South Korea.
In 2006, Serbia ranked 87th for population density and is in 110th place now. South Korea was 14th in 2006 and ranks 18th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 202.9 | 1,373 |
| 2023 | 204 | 1,372 |
| 2022 | 205.3 | 1,371 |
| 2021 | 210.5 | 1,374 |
| 2020 | 212.5 | 1,376 |
| 2019 | 205.7 | 1,374 |
| 2018 | 206.8 | 1,370 |
| 2017 | 207.9 | 1,364 |
| 2016 | 209 | 1,361 |
| 2015 | 210.1 | 1,356 |
| 2014 | 211.2 | 1,349 |
| 2013 | 212.2 | 1,341 |
| 2012 | 213.3 | 1,336 |
| 2011 | 214.3 | 1,331 |
| 2010 | 215.9 | 1,320 |
| 2009 | 216.8 | 1,316 |
| 2008 | 217.7 | 1,310 |
| 2007 | 218.6 | 1,301 |
| 2006 | 219.5 | 1,295 |
| 2005 | - | 1,289 |
| 2004 | - | 1,286 |
| 2003 | - | 1,281 |
| 2002 | - | 1,275 |
| 2001 | - | 1,268 |
| 2000 | - | 1,262 |
| 1999 | - | 1,252 |
| 1998 | - | 1,243 |
| 1997 | - | 1,234 |
| 1996 | - | 1,222 |
| 1995 | - | 1,211 |
| 1994 | - | 1,199 |
| 1993 | - | 1,187 |
| 1992 | - | 1,175 |
| 1991 | - | 1,163 |
| 1990 | - | 1,151 |
| 1989 | - | 1,140 |
| 1988 | - | 1,129 |
| 1987 | - | 1,118 |
| 1986 | - | 1,107 |
| 1985 | - | 1,096 |
| 1984 | - | 1,085 |
| 1983 | - | 1,072 |
| 1982 | - | 1,056 |
| 1981 | - | 1,040 |
| 1980 | - | 1,024 |
| 1979 | - | 1,008 |
| 1978 | - | 993 |
| 1977 | - | 978 |
| 1976 | - | 963 |
| 1975 | - | 947 |
| 1974 | - | 932 |
| 1973 | - | 916 |
| 1972 | - | 900 |
| 1971 | - | 883 |
| 1970 | - | 866 |
| 1969 | - | 847 |
| 1968 | - | 828 |
| 1967 | - | 809 |
| 1966 | - | 790 |
| 1965 | - | 771 |
| 1964 | - | 751 |
| 1963 | - | 732 |
| 1962 | - | 712 |
| 1961 | - | 692 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 57.4% | 81.5% |
| 2023 | 57.1% | 81.5% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 81.4% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 56.4% | 81.4% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 81.4% |
| 2018 | 56.1% | 81.5% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | 81.5% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 81.6% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | 81.6% |
| 2014 | 55.6% | 81.7% |
| 2013 | 55.5% | 81.8% |
| 2012 | 55.4% | 81.9% |
| 2011 | 55.2% | 81.9% |
| 2010 | 55% | 81.9% |
| 2009 | 54.8% | 81.8% |
| 2008 | 54.5% | 81.7% |
| 2007 | 54.3% | 81.6% |
| 2006 | 54.1% | 81.5% |
| 2005 | 53.9% | 81.3% |
| 2004 | 53.7% | 81% |
| 2003 | 53.4% | 80.7% |
| 2002 | 53.2% | 80.3% |
| 2001 | 53% | 79.9% |
| 2000 | 52.8% | 79.6% |
| 1999 | 52.5% | 79.4% |
| 1998 | 52.3% | 79.1% |
| 1997 | 52.1% | 78.9% |
| 1996 | 51.9% | 78.7% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 78.2% |
| 1994 | 51.4% | 77.5% |
| 1993 | 51.2% | 76.6% |
| 1992 | 51% | 75.8% |
| 1991 | 50.8% | 75% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 73.8% |
| 1989 | 50% | 72.1% |
| 1988 | 49.6% | 70.4% |
| 1987 | 49.2% | 68.6% |
| 1986 | 48.8% | 66.7% |
| 1985 | 48.3% | 64.9% |
| 1984 | 47.9% | 63.3% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 61.7% |
| 1982 | 47.1% | 60.1% |
| 1981 | 46.7% | 58.4% |
| 1980 | 46.1% | 56.7% |
| 1979 | 45.5% | 55% |
| 1978 | 44.9% | 53.2% |
| 1977 | 44.3% | 51.5% |
| 1976 | 43.7% | 49.7% |
| 1975 | 43.1% | 48% |
| 1974 | 42.5% | 46.6% |
| 1973 | 41.9% | 45.1% |
| 1972 | 41.3% | 43.7% |
| 1971 | 40.7% | 42.3% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 40.7% |
| 1969 | 38.6% | 38.8% |
| 1968 | 37.5% | 36.8% |
| 1967 | 36.4% | 35% |
| 1966 | 35.3% | 33.3% |
| 1965 | 34.2% | 32.4% |
| 1964 | 33.1% | 31.4% |
| 1963 | 32.1% | 30.4% |
| 1962 | 31.1% | 29.5% |
| 1961 | 30.1% | 28.5% |
| 1960 | 29.1% | 27.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia and from 81% to 81.5% in South Korea.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons