Guatemala has a population density of 445 people per square mile compared to 202.9 people in Serbia. Guatemala has 63,678 sq ft of land per person vs 144,613 sq ft in Serbia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Guatemala and Serbia are ranked 60th and 110th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Guatemala has 0.23% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Serbia, hence the population density in Guatemala is 119.3% higher than in Serbia.
Population density comparison
Guatemala
|
Serbia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 445 ppl/mi² | 202.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 60/197 | 110/197 |
| Population |
18912872
|
6541064
|
| Land area | 41,375 sq mi | 32,467 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 62,666 sq ft | 137,408 sq ft |
| Rural population | 46.5% | 42.6% |
| Urban population | 53.5% | 57.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.59% | 18.2% |
Guatemala vs Serbia:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Guatemala increased by 37.7%, compared to a 7.56% decline in Serbia.
In 2006, Guatemala ranked 62nd for population density and is in 60th place now. Serbia was 87th in 2006 and ranks 110th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
Serbia
|
|
| 2024 | 445 | 202.9 |
| 2023 | 438 | 204 |
| 2022 | 431 | 205.3 |
| 2021 | 425 | 210.5 |
| 2020 | 420 | 212.5 |
| 2019 | 413 | 205.7 |
| 2018 | 407 | 206.8 |
| 2017 | 400 | 207.9 |
| 2016 | 393 | 209 |
| 2015 | 386 | 210.1 |
| 2014 | 379 | 211.2 |
| 2013 | 372 | 212.2 |
| 2012 | 365 | 213.3 |
| 2011 | 358 | 214.3 |
| 2010 | 350 | 215.9 |
| 2009 | 344 | 216.8 |
| 2008 | 337 | 217.7 |
| 2007 | 330 | 218.6 |
| 2006 | 323 | 219.5 |
| 2005 | 316 | - |
| 2004 | 310 | - |
| 2003 | 303 | - |
| 2002 | 296 | - |
| 2001 | 289.3 | - |
| 2000 | 282.7 | - |
| 1999 | 276.1 | - |
| 1998 | 269.2 | - |
| 1997 | 262.4 | - |
| 1996 | 255.8 | - |
| 1995 | 249.3 | - |
| 1994 | 242.8 | - |
| 1993 | 236.4 | - |
| 1992 | 230.1 | - |
| 1991 | 224.1 | - |
| 1990 | 218.1 | - |
| 1989 | 212.1 | - |
| 1988 | 206.2 | - |
| 1987 | 200.5 | - |
| 1986 | 195.1 | - |
| 1985 | 189.7 | - |
| 1984 | 184.4 | - |
| 1983 | 179.3 | - |
| 1982 | 175 | - |
| 1981 | 171 | - |
| 1980 | 166.8 | - |
| 1979 | 162.6 | - |
| 1978 | 158.6 | - |
| 1977 | 154.7 | - |
| 1976 | 151.4 | - |
| 1975 | 148.1 | - |
| 1974 | 144.6 | - |
| 1973 | 140.9 | - |
| 1972 | 137.4 | - |
| 1971 | 133.9 | - |
| 1970 | 130.4 | - |
| 1969 | 127.1 | - |
| 1968 | 123.7 | - |
| 1967 | 120.3 | - |
| 1966 | 117 | - |
| 1965 | 113.7 | - |
| 1964 | 110.5 | - |
| 1963 | 107.3 | - |
| 1962 | 104.2 | - |
| 1961 | 101.2 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
Serbia
|
|
| 2024 | 53.5% | 57.4% |
| 2023 | 53.1% | 57.1% |
| 2022 | 52.7% | 56.9% |
| 2021 | 52.2% | 56.7% |
| 2020 | 51.8% | 56.4% |
| 2019 | 51.4% | 56.3% |
| 2018 | 51.1% | 56.1% |
| 2017 | 50.7% | 55.9% |
| 2016 | 50.3% | 55.8% |
| 2015 | 50% | 55.7% |
| 2014 | 49.6% | 55.6% |
| 2013 | 49.3% | 55.5% |
| 2012 | 49% | 55.4% |
| 2011 | 48.7% | 55.2% |
| 2010 | 48.4% | 55% |
| 2009 | 48.1% | 54.8% |
| 2008 | 47.8% | 54.5% |
| 2007 | 47.5% | 54.3% |
| 2006 | 47.2% | 54.1% |
| 2005 | 46.9% | 53.9% |
| 2004 | 46.6% | 53.7% |
| 2003 | 46.3% | 53.4% |
| 2002 | 46% | 53.2% |
| 2001 | 45.7% | 53% |
| 2000 | 45.3% | 52.8% |
| 1999 | 45% | 52.5% |
| 1998 | 44.7% | 52.3% |
| 1997 | 44.3% | 52.1% |
| 1996 | 44% | 51.9% |
| 1995 | 43.7% | 51.7% |
| 1994 | 43.3% | 51.4% |
| 1993 | 43% | 51.2% |
| 1992 | 42.7% | 51% |
| 1991 | 42.3% | 50.8% |
| 1990 | 42% | 50.4% |
| 1989 | 41.7% | 50% |
| 1988 | 41.3% | 49.6% |
| 1987 | 41% | 49.2% |
| 1986 | 40.7% | 48.8% |
| 1985 | 40.3% | 48.3% |
| 1984 | 40% | 47.9% |
| 1983 | 39.7% | 47.5% |
| 1982 | 39.4% | 47.1% |
| 1981 | 39% | 46.7% |
| 1980 | 38.7% | 46.1% |
| 1979 | 38.4% | 45.5% |
| 1978 | 38.1% | 44.9% |
| 1977 | 37.8% | 44.3% |
| 1976 | 37.4% | 43.7% |
| 1975 | 37.1% | 43.1% |
| 1974 | 36.8% | 42.5% |
| 1973 | 36.5% | 41.9% |
| 1972 | 36.2% | 41.3% |
| 1971 | 35.9% | 40.7% |
| 1970 | 35.5% | 39.7% |
| 1969 | 35.2% | 38.6% |
| 1968 | 34.9% | 37.5% |
| 1967 | 34.6% | 36.4% |
| 1966 | 34.3% | 35.3% |
| 1965 | 34% | 34.2% |
| 1964 | 33.7% | 33.1% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 32.1% |
| 1962 | 32.4% | 31.1% |
| 1961 | 31.8% | 30.1% |
| 1960 | 31.1% | 29.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 46.6% to 53.5% in Guatemala and from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia.
Densely populated cities
|
Guatemala
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Guatemala | 1.21M |
| Mixco | 528K |
| Coban | 229K |
| Quetzaltenango | 208K |
| Jalapa | 193K |
| San Miguel Petapa | 151K |
| Momostenango | 140K |
| Mazatenango | 83.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
