Serbia has a population density of 202.9 people per square mile compared to 833 people in Tuvalu. Serbia has 144,613 sq ft of land per person vs 28,054 sq ft in Tuvalu. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Serbia and Tuvalu are ranked 110th and 31st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Serbia has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0001% of the population and 0.00002% of the land area for Tuvalu, hence the population density in Serbia is 75.6% lower than in Tuvalu.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.9 ppl/mi² | 833 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 110/197 | 31/197 |
| Population |
6541064
|
9493
|
| Land area | 32,467 sq mi | 11.6 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,408 sq ft | 33,477 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.6% | 33.1% |
| Urban population | 57.4% | 66.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 18.2% | 0% |
Serbia vs Tuvalu:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Serbia decreased by 7.56%, compared to a 4.08% decline in Tuvalu.
In 2006, Serbia ranked 87th for population density and is in 110th place now. Tuvalu was 21st in 2006 and ranks 31st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 202.9 | 833 |
| 2023 | 204 | 847 |
| 2022 | 205.3 | 863 |
| 2021 | 210.5 | 880 |
| 2020 | 212.5 | 898 |
| 2019 | 205.7 | 913 |
| 2018 | 206.8 | 928 |
| 2017 | 207.9 | 938 |
| 2016 | 209 | 944 |
| 2015 | 210.1 | 946 |
| 2014 | 211.2 | 948 |
| 2013 | 212.2 | 950 |
| 2012 | 213.3 | 944 |
| 2011 | 214.3 | 931 |
| 2010 | 215.9 | 916 |
| 2009 | 216.8 | 903 |
| 2008 | 217.7 | 891 |
| 2007 | 218.6 | 879 |
| 2006 | 219.5 | 868 |
| 2005 | - | 858 |
| 2004 | - | 847 |
| 2003 | - | 837 |
| 2002 | - | 831 |
| 2001 | - | 828 |
| 2000 | - | 824 |
| 1999 | - | 820 |
| 1998 | - | 816 |
| 1997 | - | 812 |
| 1996 | - | 807 |
| 1995 | - | 801 |
| 1994 | - | 795 |
| 1993 | - | 788 |
| 1992 | - | 780 |
| 1991 | - | 771 |
| 1990 | - | 760 |
| 1989 | - | 748 |
| 1988 | - | 735 |
| 1987 | - | 723 |
| 1986 | - | 709 |
| 1985 | - | 695 |
| 1984 | - | 682 |
| 1983 | - | 672 |
| 1982 | - | 662 |
| 1981 | - | 650 |
| 1980 | - | 636 |
| 1979 | - | 620 |
| 1978 | - | 601 |
| 1977 | - | 577 |
| 1976 | - | 553 |
| 1975 | - | 528 |
| 1974 | - | 503 |
| 1973 | - | 490 |
| 1972 | - | 491 |
| 1971 | - | 491 |
| 1970 | - | 489 |
| 1969 | - | 486 |
| 1968 | - | 486 |
| 1967 | - | 488 |
| 1966 | - | 491 |
| 1965 | - | 493 |
| 1964 | - | 497 |
| 1963 | - | 497 |
| 1962 | - | 492 |
| 1961 | - | 488 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 57.4% | 66.9% |
| 2023 | 57.1% | 66.2% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 65.5% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 64.8% |
| 2020 | 56.4% | 64% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 63.2% |
| 2018 | 56.1% | 62.4% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | 61.5% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 60.6% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | 59.7% |
| 2014 | 55.6% | 58.8% |
| 2013 | 55.5% | 57.8% |
| 2012 | 55.4% | 56.8% |
| 2011 | 55.2% | 55.8% |
| 2010 | 55% | 54.8% |
| 2009 | 54.8% | 53.8% |
| 2008 | 54.5% | 52.8% |
| 2007 | 54.3% | 51.7% |
| 2006 | 54.1% | 50.7% |
| 2005 | 53.9% | 49.7% |
| 2004 | 53.7% | 48.7% |
| 2003 | 53.4% | 47.7% |
| 2002 | 53.2% | 46.8% |
| 2001 | 53% | 46.4% |
| 2000 | 52.8% | 46% |
| 1999 | 52.5% | 45.6% |
| 1998 | 52.3% | 45.2% |
| 1997 | 52.1% | 44.8% |
| 1996 | 51.9% | 44.4% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 44% |
| 1994 | 51.4% | 43.6% |
| 1993 | 51.2% | 43.2% |
| 1992 | 51% | 42.8% |
| 1991 | 50.8% | 42% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 40.7% |
| 1989 | 50% | 39.3% |
| 1988 | 49.6% | 38% |
| 1987 | 49.2% | 36.8% |
| 1986 | 48.8% | 35.5% |
| 1985 | 48.3% | 34.3% |
| 1984 | 47.9% | 33.3% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 32.4% |
| 1982 | 47.1% | 31.6% |
| 1981 | 46.7% | 30.7% |
| 1980 | 46.1% | 29.8% |
| 1979 | 45.5% | 29% |
| 1978 | 44.9% | 28.2% |
| 1977 | 44.3% | 27.3% |
| 1976 | 43.7% | 26.5% |
| 1975 | 43.1% | 25.8% |
| 1974 | 42.5% | 25% |
| 1973 | 41.9% | 24.2% |
| 1972 | 41.3% | 23.5% |
| 1971 | 40.7% | 22.8% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 22.1% |
| 1969 | 38.6% | 21.4% |
| 1968 | 37.5% | 20.7% |
| 1967 | 36.4% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 35.3% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 34.2% | 18.8% |
| 1964 | 33.1% | 18.2% |
| 1963 | 32.1% | 17.6% |
| 1962 | 31.1% | 17% |
| 1961 | 30.1% | 16.4% |
| 1960 | 29.1% | 15.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia and from 48.7% to 66.9% in Tuvalu.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons