Curacao has a population density of 910 people per square mile compared to 202.9 people in Serbia. Curacao has 30,642 sq ft of land per person vs 144,629 sq ft in Serbia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Curacao and Serbia are ranked 26th and 110th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Curacao has 0.002% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Serbia, hence the population density in Curacao is 348% higher than in Serbia.
Population density comparison
Curacao
|
Serbia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 910 ppl/mi² | 202.9 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 26/197 | 110/197 |
| Population |
155945
|
6494317
|
| Land area | 171.4 sq mi | 32,467 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 30,642 sq ft | 137,424 sq ft |
| Rural population | 8.57% | 37.6% |
| Urban population | 91.4% | 62.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 18.2% |
Curacao vs Serbia:
Population density chart by year
From 2011 to 2024, population density in Curacao increased by 3.41%, compared to a 5.34% decline in Serbia.
In 2011, Curacao ranked 26th for population density and is in 26th place still. Serbia was 97th in 2011 and ranks 110th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Serbia
|
|
| 2024 | 910 | 202.9 |
| 2023 | 902 | 204 |
| 2022 | 894 | 205.3 |
| 2021 | 898 | 210.5 |
| 2020 | 907 | 212.5 |
| 2019 | 918 | 205.7 |
| 2018 | 929 | 206.8 |
| 2017 | 934 | 207.9 |
| 2016 | 931 | 209 |
| 2015 | 922 | 210.1 |
| 2014 | 909 | 211.2 |
| 2013 | 897 | 212.2 |
| 2012 | 887 | 213.3 |
| 2011 | 880 | 214.3 |
| 2010 | - | 215.9 |
| 2009 | - | 216.8 |
| 2008 | - | 217.7 |
| 2007 | - | 218.6 |
| 2006 | - | 219.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Curacao
|
Serbia
|
|
| 2024 | 91.4% | 62.4% |
| 2023 | 91.4% | 62.1% |
| 2022 | 91.4% | 61.9% |
| 2021 | 91.4% | 61.4% |
| 2020 | 91.4% | 61.2% |
| 2019 | 91.4% | 61% |
| 2018 | 91.4% | 60.8% |
| 2017 | 91.3% | 60.6% |
| 2016 | 91.3% | 60.4% |
| 2015 | 91.3% | 60.1% |
| 2014 | 91.3% | 59.9% |
| 2013 | 91.3% | 59.6% |
| 2012 | 91.3% | 59.3% |
| 2011 | 91.3% | 59.4% |
| 2010 | 91.2% | 59.4% |
| 2009 | 91.2% | 59.2% |
| 2008 | 91.2% | 58.9% |
| 2007 | 91.2% | 58.6% |
| 2006 | 91.2% | 58.2% |
| 2005 | 91.2% | 57.8% |
| 2004 | 91.2% | 57.3% |
| 2003 | 91.1% | 56.9% |
| 2002 | 91.1% | 56.5% |
| 2001 | 91.1% | 56% |
| 2000 | 90.9% | 55.6% |
| 1999 | 90.4% | 55.1% |
| 1998 | 89.8% | 54.6% |
| 1997 | 89% | 54% |
| 1996 | 88.1% | 53.5% |
| 1995 | 87.2% | 52.9% |
| 1994 | 86.4% | 52.4% |
| 1993 | 85.7% | 51.8% |
| 1992 | 85.1% | 51.3% |
| 1991 | 84.7% | 50.8% |
| 1990 | 84.2% | 50.4% |
| 1989 | 83.9% | 49.9% |
| 1988 | 83.5% | 49.5% |
| 1987 | 83.2% | 49.2% |
| 1986 | 82.8% | 48.8% |
| 1985 | 82.5% | 48.4% |
| 1984 | 82.2% | 48% |
| 1983 | 82% | 47.6% |
| 1982 | 81.7% | 47.2% |
| 1981 | 81.5% | 46.7% |
| 1980 | 81.2% | 46.2% |
| 1979 | 81% | 45.7% |
| 1978 | 80.7% | 45.2% |
| 1977 | 80.5% | 44.7% |
| 1976 | 80.3% | 44.1% |
| 1975 | 80.1% | 43.5% |
| 1974 | 79.8% | 42.9% |
| 1973 | 79.6% | 42.2% |
| 1972 | 79.3% | 41.5% |
| 1971 | 79.1% | 40.8% |
| 1970 | 78.8% | 40% |
| 1969 | 78.5% | 39.1% |
| 1968 | 78.3% | 38% |
| 1967 | 77.9% | 36.9% |
| 1966 | 77.6% | 35.8% |
| 1965 | 77.3% | 34.6% |
| 1964 | 76.9% | 33.4% |
| 1963 | 76.5% | 32.2% |
| 1962 | 76.1% | 31.1% |
| 1961 | 75.6% | 30.1% |
| 1960 | 75.2% | 29.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 91.2% to 91.4% in Curacao and from 57.3% to 62.4% in Serbia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
