Serbia has a population density of 202.9 people per square mile compared to 74.3 people in Zambia. Serbia has 144,613 sq ft of land per person vs 380,067 sq ft in Zambia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Serbia and Zambia are ranked 110th and 158th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Serbia has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.26% of the population and 0.5% of the land area for Zambia, hence the population density in Serbia is 173.2% higher than in Zambia.
Population density comparison
Serbia
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.9 ppl/mi² | 74.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 110/197 | 158/197 |
| Population |
6541064
|
22402291
|
| Land area | 32,467 sq mi | 287,024 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,408 sq ft | 375,407 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.6% | 53.1% |
| Urban population | 57.4% | 46.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 18.2% | 11.6% |
Serbia vs Zambia:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Serbia decreased by 7.56%, compared to a 75.7% growth in Zambia.
In 2006, Serbia ranked 87th for population density and is in 110th place now. Zambia was 164th in 2006 and ranks 158th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Serbia
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 202.9 | 74.3 |
| 2023 | 204 | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 205.3 | 70.2 |
| 2021 | 210.5 | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 212.5 | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 205.7 | 64.5 |
| 2018 | 206.8 | 62.6 |
| 2017 | 207.9 | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 209 | 58.9 |
| 2015 | 210.1 | 57.1 |
| 2014 | 211.2 | 55.4 |
| 2013 | 212.2 | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 213.3 | 52 |
| 2011 | 214.3 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 215.9 | 48.7 |
| 2009 | 216.8 | 47 |
| 2008 | 217.7 | 45.4 |
| 2007 | 218.6 | 43.8 |
| 2006 | 219.5 | 42.3 |
| 2005 | - | 40.8 |
| 2004 | - | 39.5 |
| 2003 | - | 38.3 |
| 2002 | - | 37.1 |
| 2001 | - | 36 |
| 2000 | - | 34.9 |
| 1999 | - | 33.9 |
| 1998 | - | 33 |
| 1997 | - | 32.2 |
| 1996 | - | 31.4 |
| 1995 | - | 30.6 |
| 1994 | - | 29.9 |
| 1993 | - | 29.2 |
| 1992 | - | 28.5 |
| 1991 | - | 27.8 |
| 1990 | - | 27.1 |
| 1989 | - | 26.4 |
| 1988 | - | 25.8 |
| 1987 | - | 25.1 |
| 1986 | - | 24.3 |
| 1985 | - | 23.6 |
| 1984 | - | 22.9 |
| 1983 | - | 22.2 |
| 1982 | - | 21.5 |
| 1981 | - | 20.8 |
| 1980 | - | 20.2 |
| 1979 | - | 19.6 |
| 1978 | - | 19 |
| 1977 | - | 18.5 |
| 1976 | - | 17.9 |
| 1975 | - | 17.4 |
| 1974 | - | 16.9 |
| 1973 | - | 16.4 |
| 1972 | - | 15.9 |
| 1971 | - | 15.5 |
| 1970 | - | 15.1 |
| 1969 | - | 14.6 |
| 1968 | - | 14.2 |
| 1967 | - | 13.7 |
| 1966 | - | 13.3 |
| 1965 | - | 12.9 |
| 1964 | - | 12.5 |
| 1963 | - | 12.1 |
| 1962 | - | 11.7 |
| 1961 | - | 11.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Serbia
|
Zambia
|
|
| 2024 | 57.4% | 46.9% |
| 2023 | 57.1% | 46.3% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 45.8% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 45.2% |
| 2020 | 56.4% | 44.6% |
| 2019 | 56.3% | 44.1% |
| 2018 | 56.1% | 43.5% |
| 2017 | 55.9% | 43% |
| 2016 | 55.8% | 42.4% |
| 2015 | 55.7% | 41.9% |
| 2014 | 55.6% | 41.4% |
| 2013 | 55.5% | 40.9% |
| 2012 | 55.4% | 40.4% |
| 2011 | 55.2% | 39.9% |
| 2010 | 55% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 54.8% | 38.9% |
| 2008 | 54.5% | 38.4% |
| 2007 | 54.3% | 37.9% |
| 2006 | 54.1% | 37.4% |
| 2005 | 53.9% | 36.9% |
| 2004 | 53.7% | 36.4% |
| 2003 | 53.4% | 36% |
| 2002 | 53.2% | 35.5% |
| 2001 | 53% | 35% |
| 2000 | 52.8% | 34.8% |
| 1999 | 52.5% | 35.3% |
| 1998 | 52.3% | 35.7% |
| 1997 | 52.1% | 36.2% |
| 1996 | 51.9% | 36.6% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 37.1% |
| 1994 | 51.4% | 37.6% |
| 1993 | 51.2% | 38% |
| 1992 | 51% | 38.5% |
| 1991 | 50.8% | 39% |
| 1990 | 50.4% | 39.4% |
| 1989 | 50% | 39.5% |
| 1988 | 49.6% | 39.5% |
| 1987 | 49.2% | 39.6% |
| 1986 | 48.8% | 39.6% |
| 1985 | 48.3% | 39.7% |
| 1984 | 47.9% | 39.7% |
| 1983 | 47.5% | 39.8% |
| 1982 | 47.1% | 39.8% |
| 1981 | 46.7% | 39.9% |
| 1980 | 46.1% | 39.8% |
| 1979 | 45.5% | 38.8% |
| 1978 | 44.9% | 37.8% |
| 1977 | 44.3% | 36.9% |
| 1976 | 43.7% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 43.1% | 34.9% |
| 1974 | 42.5% | 34% |
| 1973 | 41.9% | 33.1% |
| 1972 | 41.3% | 32.1% |
| 1971 | 40.7% | 31.2% |
| 1970 | 39.7% | 30.4% |
| 1969 | 38.6% | 29.4% |
| 1968 | 37.5% | 27.8% |
| 1967 | 36.4% | 26.3% |
| 1966 | 35.3% | 24.8% |
| 1965 | 34.2% | 23.4% |
| 1964 | 33.1% | 22% |
| 1963 | 32.1% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 31.1% | 19.8% |
| 1961 | 30.1% | 19% |
| 1960 | 29.1% | 18.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 53.7% to 57.4% in Serbia and from 36.4% to 46.9% in Zambia.
Densely populated cities
|
Serbia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Belgrade | 1.2M |
| Novi Sad | 260K |
| Pristina | 199K |
| Nis | 183K |
| Kragujevac | 151K |
| Subotica | 106K |
| Valjevo | 90.3K |
| Cacak | 71.9K |
| Mitrovica | 71.6K |
| Novi Pazar | 66.5K |
|
Zambia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lusaka | 2.47M |
| Kitwe | 625K |
| Ndola | 528K |
| Chingola | 255K |
| Mufulira | 182K |
| Livingstone | 177K |
| Kasama | 158K |
| Kapiri Mposhi | 65.2K |
| Choma | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
