Cape Verde has a population density of 340 people per square mile compared to 10.2 people in Iceland. Cape Verde has 82,707 sq ft of land per person vs 2,868,586 sq ft in Iceland. Cape Verde and Iceland rank 73rd and 194th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cape Verde has 0.006% of the world's population and 0.003% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.005% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Iceland, making the population density in Cape Verde 3,246% higher than in Iceland.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Cape Verde
|
Iceland
|
|
| 2026 | 340 | 10.2 |
| 2025 | 339 | 10.1 |
| 2024 | 337 | 9.93 |
| 2023 | 336 | 9.91 |
| 2022 | 334 | 9.81 |
| 2021 | 332 | 9.57 |
| 2020 | 331 | 9.41 |
| 2019 | 330 | 9.26 |
| 2018 | 330 | 9.06 |
| 2017 | 330 | 8.87 |
| 2016 | 329 | 8.67 |
| 2015 | 329 | 8.55 |
| 2014 | 329 | 8.46 |
| 2013 | 329 | 8.36 |
| 2012 | 329 | 8.29 |
| 2011 | 329 | 8.24 |
| 2010 | 328 | 8.22 |
| 2009 | 325 | 8.23 |
| 2008 | 322 | 8.2 |
| 2007 | 319 | 8.05 |
| 2006 | 315 | 7.85 |
| 2005 | 312 | 7.67 |
| 2004 | 308 | 7.55 |
| 2003 | 304 | 7.48 |
| 2002 | 300 | 7.43 |
| 2001 | 295.8 | 7.36 |
| 2000 | 291.3 | 7.27 |
| 1999 | 287 | 7.17 |
| 1998 | 282.6 | 7.08 |
| 1997 | 278.1 | 7 |
| 1996 | 273.5 | 6.95 |
| 1995 | 268.7 | 6.91 |
| 1994 | 263.6 | 6.87 |
| 1993 | 258.3 | 6.81 |
| 1992 | 252.8 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 247.2 | 6.66 |
| 1990 | 241.3 | 6.58 |
| 1989 | 236.4 | 6.53 |
| 1988 | 232.9 | 6.45 |
| 1987 | 229.6 | 6.35 |
| 1986 | 226.4 | 6.28 |
| 1985 | 223.2 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 220.1 | 6.19 |
| 1983 | 217 | 6.12 |
| 1982 | 213.8 | 6.04 |
| 1981 | 210.7 | 5.96 |
| 1980 | 207.8 | 5.89 |
| 1979 | 205.3 | 5.83 |
| 1978 | 203.2 | 5.78 |
| 1977 | 201.1 | 5.73 |
| 1976 | 198.9 | 5.69 |
| 1975 | 196.6 | 5.63 |
| 1974 | 194.5 | 5.56 |
| 1973 | 192.7 | 5.49 |
| 1972 | 191.1 | 5.4 |
| 1971 | 189 | 5.32 |
| 1970 | 185 | 5.28 |
| 1969 | 179.5 | 5.25 |
| 1968 | 173.6 | 5.21 |
| 1967 | 168 | 5.13 |
| 1966 | 162.6 | 5.05 |
| 1965 | 157.4 | 4.97 |
| 1964 | 152.3 | 4.88 |
| 1963 | 147.4 | 4.8 |
| 1962 | 142.6 | 4.71 |
| 1961 | 138.2 | 4.63 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/cape-verde/iceland | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Cape Verde increased by 7.96%, compared to a 29.7% growth in Iceland.
In 2006, Cape Verde ranked 66th by population density and is 73rd now. Iceland was 190th in 2006 and ranks 194th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Cape Verde
|
Iceland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 340 ppl/mi² | 10.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 73/197 | 194/197 |
| Population |
530391
|
397129
|
| Land area | 1,556 sq mi | 38,931 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 82,645 sq ft | 2,808,042 sq ft |
| Rural population | 23.2% | 5.82% |
| Urban population | 76.8% | 94.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cape Verde
|
Iceland
|
|
| 2024 | 76.8% | 94.2% |
| 2023 | 75.9% | 94.2% |
| 2022 | 75% | 94.2% |
| 2021 | 74.2% | 94.2% |
| 2020 | 72.9% | 94.1% |
| 2019 | 71.6% | 94% |
| 2018 | 70.4% | 93.9% |
| 2017 | 69.2% | 93.8% |
| 2016 | 68% | 93.8% |
| 2015 | 66.9% | 93.7% |
| 2014 | 65.8% | 93.6% |
| 2013 | 64.7% | 93.6% |
| 2012 | 63.7% | 93.5% |
| 2011 | 62.7% | 93.4% |
| 2010 | 61.8% | 93.5% |
| 2009 | 60.9% | 93.4% |
| 2008 | 60.1% | 93.1% |
| 2007 | 59.3% | 92.4% |
| 2006 | 58.5% | 92.2% |
| 2005 | 57.8% | 92.4% |
| 2004 | 57.1% | 92.4% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 92.3% |
| 2002 | 55.6% | 92.2% |
| 2001 | 54.8% | 92% |
| 2000 | 53.9% | 92% |
| 1999 | 53.1% | 91.8% |
| 1998 | 52.2% | 91.7% |
| 1997 | 51.4% | 92% |
| 1996 | 50.5% | 91.8% |
| 1995 | 49.6% | 91.6% |
| 1994 | 48.6% | 91.4% |
| 1993 | 47.6% | 91.3% |
| 1992 | 46.6% | 91.1% |
| 1991 | 45.4% | 90.9% |
| 1990 | 44.1% | 90.6% |
| 1989 | 42.5% | 90.4% |
| 1988 | 40.5% | 90.1% |
| 1987 | 38.2% | 89.8% |
| 1986 | 35.6% | 89.6% |
| 1985 | 33% | 89.3% |
| 1984 | 30.5% | 89.1% |
| 1983 | 28.1% | 88.9% |
| 1982 | 26.1% | 88.6% |
| 1981 | 24.5% | 88.3% |
| 1980 | 23.5% | 88.1% |
| 1979 | 22.9% | 87.9% |
| 1978 | 22.4% | 87.7% |
| 1977 | 22% | 87.4% |
| 1976 | 21.7% | 87.2% |
| 1975 | 21.4% | 86.9% |
| 1974 | 21.2% | 86.5% |
| 1973 | 20.8% | 86.2% |
| 1972 | 20.5% | 85.7% |
| 1971 | 20% | 85.3% |
| 1970 | 19.3% | 85% |
| 1969 | 18.3% | 84.8% |
| 1968 | 16.9% | 84.4% |
| 1967 | 15.2% | 83.9% |
| 1966 | 13.3% | 83.5% |
| 1965 | 11.5% | 83.2% |
| 1964 | 9.81% | 82.7% |
| 1963 | 8.33% | 82% |
| 1962 | 7.22% | 81.5% |
| 1961 | 6.6% | 81% |
| 1960 | 6.5% | 80.4% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/cape-verde/iceland | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 57.1% to 76.8% in Cape Verde and from 92.4% to 94.2% in Iceland.
Densely populated cities
|
Cape Verde
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Praia | 159K |
| Mindelo | 70.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/cape-verde/iceland | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2010–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.