Austria has a population density of 288.1 people per square mile compared to 10.4 people in Iceland. Austria has 98,368 sq ft of land per person vs 2,740,233 sq ft in Iceland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Austria and Iceland are ranked 83rd and 192nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Austria has 0.11% of the world's population and 0.06% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.005% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for Iceland, hence the population density in Austria is 2,672% higher than in Iceland.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 288.1 ppl/mi² | 10.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 83/197 | 192/197 |
| Population |
9171198
|
412970
|
| Land area | 31,861 sq mi | 38,931 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 96,774 sq ft | 2,682,398 sq ft |
| Rural population | 40.2% | 5.91% |
| Urban population | 59.8% | 94.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.5% | 0% |
Austria vs Iceland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Austria increased by 12.3%, compared to a 37.7% growth in Iceland.
In 2004, Austria ranked 79th for population density and is in 83rd place now. Iceland was 188th in 2004 and ranks 192nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 288.1 | 10.4 |
| 2023 | 286.6 | 10.1 |
| 2022 | 283.8 | 9.81 |
| 2021 | 281.1 | 9.57 |
| 2020 | 279.9 | 9.41 |
| 2019 | 278.7 | 9.26 |
| 2018 | 277.5 | 9.06 |
| 2017 | 276.1 | 8.87 |
| 2016 | 274.2 | 8.67 |
| 2015 | 271.3 | 8.55 |
| 2014 | 268.2 | 8.46 |
| 2013 | 266.1 | 8.36 |
| 2012 | 264.6 | 8.29 |
| 2011 | 263.4 | 8.24 |
| 2010 | 262.5 | 8.22 |
| 2009 | 261.9 | 8.23 |
| 2008 | 261.2 | 8.2 |
| 2007 | 260.4 | 8.05 |
| 2006 | 259.5 | 7.85 |
| 2005 | 258.2 | 7.67 |
| 2004 | 256.5 | 7.55 |
| 2003 | 254.9 | 7.48 |
| 2002 | 253.7 | 7.43 |
| 2001 | 252.4 | 7.36 |
| 2000 | 251.5 | 7.27 |
| 1999 | 250.8 | 7.17 |
| 1998 | 250.4 | 7.08 |
| 1997 | 250.1 | 7 |
| 1996 | 249.8 | 6.95 |
| 1995 | 249.5 | 6.91 |
| 1994 | 249.1 | 6.87 |
| 1993 | 248.1 | 6.81 |
| 1992 | 246.1 | 6.74 |
| 1991 | 243.4 | 6.66 |
| 1990 | 241 | 6.58 |
| 1989 | 239.1 | 6.53 |
| 1988 | 238.1 | 6.45 |
| 1987 | 237.7 | 6.35 |
| 1986 | 237.6 | 6.28 |
| 1985 | 237.4 | 6.24 |
| 1984 | 237.3 | 6.19 |
| 1983 | 237.3 | 6.12 |
| 1982 | 237.7 | 6.04 |
| 1981 | 237.6 | 5.96 |
| 1980 | 236.9 | 5.89 |
| 1979 | 236.9 | 5.83 |
| 1978 | 237.4 | 5.78 |
| 1977 | 237.5 | 5.73 |
| 1976 | 237.5 | 5.69 |
| 1975 | 237.9 | 5.63 |
| 1974 | 238.5 | 5.56 |
| 1973 | 238.1 | 5.49 |
| 1972 | 236.8 | 5.4 |
| 1971 | 235.4 | 5.32 |
| 1970 | 234.4 | 5.28 |
| 1969 | 233.5 | 5.25 |
| 1968 | 232.7 | 5.21 |
| 1967 | 231.5 | 5.13 |
| 1966 | 229.8 | 5.05 |
| 1965 | 228.2 | 4.97 |
| 1964 | 226.7 | 4.88 |
| 1963 | 225.2 | 4.8 |
| 1962 | 223.8 | 4.71 |
| 1961 | 222.4 | 4.63 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 59.8% | 94.1% |
| 2023 | 59.5% | 94% |
| 2022 | 59.3% | 94% |
| 2021 | 59% | 93.9% |
| 2020 | 58.7% | 93.9% |
| 2019 | 58.5% | 93.9% |
| 2018 | 58.3% | 93.8% |
| 2017 | 58.1% | 93.8% |
| 2016 | 57.9% | 93.7% |
| 2015 | 57.7% | 93.7% |
| 2014 | 57.5% | 93.7% |
| 2013 | 57.3% | 93.6% |
| 2012 | 57.1% | 93.6% |
| 2011 | 57.1% | 93.6% |
| 2010 | 57.4% | 93.6% |
| 2009 | 57.7% | 93.5% |
| 2008 | 58% | 93.4% |
| 2007 | 58.2% | 93.3% |
| 2006 | 58.5% | 93.2% |
| 2005 | 58.8% | 93% |
| 2004 | 59.1% | 92.9% |
| 2003 | 59.4% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 59.7% | 92.7% |
| 2001 | 59.9% | 92.5% |
| 2000 | 60.2% | 92.4% |
| 1999 | 60.5% | 92.3% |
| 1998 | 60.8% | 92.1% |
| 1997 | 61% | 92% |
| 1996 | 61.3% | 91.8% |
| 1995 | 61.6% | 91.6% |
| 1994 | 61.9% | 91.5% |
| 1993 | 62.1% | 91.3% |
| 1992 | 62.4% | 91.1% |
| 1991 | 62.7% | 90.9% |
| 1990 | 63% | 90.8% |
| 1989 | 63.2% | 90.5% |
| 1988 | 63.5% | 90.3% |
| 1987 | 63.8% | 90.1% |
| 1986 | 64% | 89.8% |
| 1985 | 64.3% | 89.6% |
| 1984 | 64.6% | 89.3% |
| 1983 | 64.8% | 89.1% |
| 1982 | 65.1% | 88.8% |
| 1981 | 65.4% | 88.5% |
| 1980 | 65.4% | 88.3% |
| 1979 | 65.4% | 88% |
| 1978 | 65.4% | 87.6% |
| 1977 | 65.4% | 87.3% |
| 1976 | 65.4% | 87% |
| 1975 | 65.3% | 86.7% |
| 1974 | 65.3% | 86.3% |
| 1973 | 65.3% | 86% |
| 1972 | 65.3% | 85.6% |
| 1971 | 65.3% | 85.3% |
| 1970 | 65.3% | 84.9% |
| 1969 | 65.2% | 84.5% |
| 1968 | 65.2% | 84.1% |
| 1967 | 65.1% | 83.6% |
| 1966 | 65.1% | 83.2% |
| 1965 | 65% | 82.7% |
| 1964 | 65% | 82.3% |
| 1963 | 64.9% | 81.8% |
| 1962 | 64.9% | 81.3% |
| 1961 | 64.8% | 80.8% |
| 1960 | 64.7% | 80.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 59.1% to 59.8% in Austria and from 92.9% to 94.1% in Iceland.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Vienna | 1.97M |
| Graz | 293K |
| Linz | 212K |
| Salzburg | 155K |
| Innsbruck | 131K |
| Klagenfurt | 101K |
| Wels | 65.3K |
| Villach | 65.1K |
| Sankt Polten | 55.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons